The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.9.1-1.fc15
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing
farsight2-0.0.24-1.fc15
kde-l10n-4.6.0-3.fc15.1
kdepim-4.4.10-1.fc15
kdepim-runtime-4.4
I installed TC1 x86_64 DVD last night. I only hit a few minor issues. It
prompted me for a network connection which I just cancelled and FirstBoot
doesn't run to setup your initial account. You can't login graphically as
root after the install so you just have to flip to another console and
crea
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.9.1-1.fc15
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing
phpMyAdmin-3.3.9.1-1.fc15
Details about builds:
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing
fedora-packager-0.5.5.0-1.fc15
Details about builds:
fedora-packager-0.5.5.0-1.fc15
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:01 -0800, Rob Healey wrote:
> In reading the post from this list today, I understand that there is a
> problem with installing this iso with anaconda!
I manage to do a next next next install on i386 off the TC1 DVD today
and Anaconda gave me no problems..
JBG
--
test m
Greetings:
In reading the post from this list today, I understand that there is a
problem with installing this iso with anaconda!
Will there be a TC2 with the listed work around? Will it also have packages
from the mass-rebuild so that there are no fc14, fc13, and fc12 packages???
Sincerely you
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:34:04 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> # F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2011-02-11
> # Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of
> Fedora
> 15.
On 02/10/2011 10:34 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> Will F15 be using the proposed new standard packaging method?
>
> http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-analysis/open-sauce/44800-linux-distros-in-bid-for-common-app-installer
It is not a new packaging method but additional metadata for various
things.
On 02/10/2011 01:34 PM, James Laska wrote:
> # F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2011-02-11
> # Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
> 15. We'll be disc
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nbd-2.9.20-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kerne
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nbd-2.9.20-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krb5-1.8.2-8.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-1.2.5-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 04:04 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
>
> On 2011-02-11 03:58, peter_someone wrote:
> > Am 2011-02-10 09:45, schrieb He Rui:
> >> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
> >>> Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
> >>
People,
On 2011-02-11 03:58, peter_someone wrote:
> Am 2011-02-10 09:45, schrieb He Rui:
>> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
>>> Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
>>> or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
>> F-15 is suppos
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
Alpha r
On Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:03:32 pm Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I just came across this today and I know that it is past Feb 8th, but is it
> too late to get involved in this anyway???
>
> Can just a normal user using mass-rebuild.py and mass-tag.py get involved
> in this project?
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 02:45:10 am He Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
> >Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
> >
> > or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
>
> F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time
Am 2011-02-10 09:45, schrieb He Rui:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
>> Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
>> or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
> F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time, but currently the default
>
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:12 +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2011/2/10 Andre Robatino:
> > Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1].
>
> Beware: unlike the earlier snaphot "Fedora 15 Alpha TC1" of last
> month, the current installer v15.19 will ultimately --abort-- after
> choosing "create custom
2011/2/10 Andre Robatino:
> Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1].
Beware: unlike the earlier snaphot "Fedora 15 Alpha TC1" of last
month, the current installer v15.19 will ultimately --abort-- after
choosing "create custom layout".
The particularly unpleasant fact about this is that the instal
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
>Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
> or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time, but currently the default
repo is still rawhide. Is branching delayed?
20 matches
Mail list logo
