On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 07:37 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> excuse me sir, but this thread _is_ about systemd :)
Not the part I replied to. I only replied to Petrus' suggestion about
updates-testing, to explain that we already do what he suggested.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IR
2011/3/21 Adam Williamson
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:08 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >
> > Understood - although I thought the point being bandied about here was
> > not the offending rsyslog itself - but rather that it brought to light a
> > new sensitivity - of what appears to be systemd
On 03/21/2011 08:56 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> How can I get just gnome3?
There is no more Gnome 2. Gnome 2 is deprecated in favor of Gnome 3.
Fedora 15 will only contain Gnome 3.0.
No one will maintain or distribute any part of Gnome 2.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 19:56 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> I have mostly a pretty clean kde4 f15 system. Naturally, I am intrigued by
> Gnome3. I know that I could groupinstall gnome, but I don't want any of that
> old gnome2 cruft.
>
> How can I get just gnome3?
I'm not quite sure what y
I have mostly a pretty clean kde4 f15 system. Naturally, I am intrigued by
Gnome3. I know that I could groupinstall gnome, but I don't want any of that
old gnome2 cruft.
How can I get just gnome3?
How can I add a gnome entry into kdm, so that I can select (without changing my
kde default, of c
On 03/21/2011 07:02 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> Greetings folks,
>>
>> As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
>> custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
>> important updates. The followi
Adam Williamson wrote:
> again, you know, pre-release. you really shouldn't be particularly
> surprised if it vomits on your shoes at any given point. :)
:-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Mon Mar 21 13:15:16 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:37 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > anyone running a pre-release should be running the candidate
> > update packages and providing feedback on them.
>
> Well, I did. But I had a heart attack before I was able to do so.
again, you know, pr
Adam Williamson wrote:
> anyone running a pre-release should be running the candidate
> update packages and providing feedback on them.
Well, I did. But I had a heart attack before I was able to do so.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Oh sorry, I was confused. Carry on ;)
Fab
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 01:05 +0100, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
> > So there's no chance of 4.8 in F15? :(
>
> It's already in F15. Christoph was talking about F14.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fe
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 01:05 +0100, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
> So there's no chance of 4.8 in F15? :(
It's already in F15. Christoph was talking about F14.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:24 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Thanks, I understand implicitly. However, what got me into trouble was the
> update that automatically changed my rawhide installation into f15 alpha and
> enabled updates-testing while doing so. Updates-testing should not have bee
So there's no chance of 4.8 in F15? :(
Fab
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Christoph Wickert <
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:10 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists:
> > On 03/21/2011 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that th
Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:10 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists:
> On 03/21/2011 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >
> > Please keep in mind that these are not official Fedora packages, i.
> > e.they are not signed. [...]
>
> Yes thank you - i understood them as your private builds (not being i
Adam Williamson wrote:
> updates is inactive for Branched releases, but that's because there's no
> need for it; as there's no frozen 'master' tree, packages simply go
> straight from updates-testing in the main 'release' repo (which I tend
> to refer to as dist-f15, although technically that's ju
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
> custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
> important updates. The following updates are needed in order to proceed
> with
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:54 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >> A possible solution would be to have both updates and updates-testing
> >> repos for all fedoras, even the not yet released branched fedora.
> >
> > Erm. We already do exactly this
>
> I must have miss
On Mar 21, 2011, at 4:11 PM, James Laska wrote:
> The x86_64 boot.iso is available from
> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso. Alternatively, you can provide
> anaconda karma feedback by updating to the latest anaconda on an
> existing live image.
Looks like I posted the wrong image. I'll
On 03/21/2011 02:11 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
> custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
> important updates. The following updates are needed in order to proceed
> with building Be
Rawhide Report fedoraproject.org> writes:
> rsyslog-5.7.9-1.fc16
>
> * Fri Mar 18 2011 Tomas Heinrich redhat.com> 5.7.9-1
> - upgrade to new upstream version 5.7.9
> - enable compilation of several new modules,
> create new subpackages for some of them
> - integrate change
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt-0.8.2-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krb5-1.7.1-18.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.
Compose started at Mon Mar 21 08:15:04 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
audacious-plugin-xmp-3.3.0-6.fc15.x86_64 requires audacious(plugin-api)
= 0:17
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
Greetings folks,
As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
important updates. The following updates are needed in order to proceed
with building Beta TC and RC milestones.
* https://admin.fedorap
Adam Williamson wrote:
>> A possible solution would be to have both updates and updates-testing
>> repos for all fedoras, even the not yet released branched fedora.
>
> Erm. We already do exactly this
I must have missed that. I just checked, and sure enough, fedora-updates does
indeed exist for
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-21/fedora-qa.2011-03-21-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-21/fedora-qa.2011-03-21-15.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-21/fedora-qa.2011-03-21-15.00.lo
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> I fixed it here by reverting to the previous version of rsyslog.
Thanks. So did I. This thread has broken up into 3 or 4 separate thread, so I
commented there.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day | Version:
Re
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:08 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Erm. We already do exactly this, and the offending update is only in f15
> > updates-testing, not in dist-f15. It has -4 karma and will never be
> > promoted to 'stable' without a fix.
2011/3/21 Genes MailLists :
> On 03/21/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Erm. We already do exactly this, and the offending update is only in f15
>> updates-testing, not in dist-f15. It has -4 karma and will never be
>> promoted to 'stable' without a fix.
>
> Understood - although I thoug
On 03/21/2011 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists:
>> On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ?
thanks!
>>> http://
On 03/21/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Erm. We already do exactly this, and the offending update is only in f15
> updates-testing, not in dist-f15. It has -4 karma and will never be
> promoted to 'stable' without a fix.
Understood - although I thought the point being bandied about her
Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists:
> On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >> Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ?
> >>
> >> thanks!
> > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/
> >
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> How can I add tests for my package to Fedora AutoQA, eg. so that they
> run (say) each time I build the package in Koji?
There's some pretty good documentation on this here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Writing_AutoQA_Tests
that ex
On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome
>> shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january
>> 2011) is 4.8
>>
>> Is there a chance 4.8 could be pac
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:49:21 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> How can I add tests for my package to Fedora AutoQA, eg. so that they
> run (say) each time I build the package in Koji?
>
> (Note: I'm not asking how to run an AutoQA server myself.)
>From the following message:
http://list
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 14:16:34 -0400,
Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Feedback/comments welcome.
Thanks!
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2011/3/21 Bruno Wolff III
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 13:18:32 -0700,
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> > It is selinux that is denying the startup, system will work, but you need
> to start with it disabled :(
>
> Starting in permissive mode is enough. Disabling will result in needing to
> do a re
On 03/21/2011 07:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 07:36 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after having done "yum update" this sunday morning, I have problems to
>> modify my network printer (lexmark e120n) properties:
>>
>> Getting an error popup:
>>
>> Option 'pri
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 13:30 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > Hmm... I'm not sure if it's reasonable - this will require
> > modification of many systemd services.
>
> I don't know whether modifying services is reasonable, but what is not
> reasonable is for a u
If you're a Fedora package maintainer, you will be surely interested in this
topic.
AutoQA [1] is a framework for automatic test execution written for Fedora
needs. It is developed by Fedora QA [2] team. We have finally reached the state
where we can experimentally share some tests results with
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 07:36 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after having done "yum update" this sunday morning, I have problems to
> modify my network printer (lexmark e120n) properties:
>
> Getting an error popup:
>
> Option 'printer-resolution' has value '(unknown IPP tag)' and can
2011/3/21 Adam Williamson :
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:08 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> Can this error be marked as blocker?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658938
>
> If you want to propose a bug as a blocker, just mark it as one. That is
> the correct procedure, as per
> htt
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:08 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Can this error be marked as blocker?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658938
If you want to propose a bug as a blocker, just mark it as one. That is
the correct procedure, as per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_block
On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome
> shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january
> 2011) is 4.8
>
> Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ?
>
> thanks!
http://repos.fedorapeople
Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome
shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january
2011) is 4.8
Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ?
thanks!
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fe
ree
> to respond to this email with any discussion topics or corrections.
> Alternatively, feel free to update the meeting wiki page linked below.
> See you in #fedora-meeting.
>
> == Proposed Agenda Topics ==
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110321
>
> 1. Th
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 09:38 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:12:15 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2011-03-21
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET) [1]
> > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
> >
> > Gre
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:50:47 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:49:51 -0400,
> Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Is it OK if I change the time on the Fedora meeting page to match
> > > this?
> > > I had just checked and the start time was still listed as 1600.
> >
> > Just
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:49:51 -0400,
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Is it OK if I change the time on the Fedora meeting page to match
> > this?
> > I had just checked and the start time was still listed as 1600.
>
> Just hit Refresh or clean the cache. It was already updated.
I think we are talking
> Is it OK if I change the time on the Fedora meeting page to match
> this?
> I had just checked and the start time was still listed as 1600.
Just hit Refresh or clean the cache. It was already updated.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:12:15 -0400,
James Laska wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2011-03-21
> # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> Greetings,
>
> Please note the UTC time change for this meeting. As always,
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 08:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:26 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > 2011/3/18 Jóhann B. :
> > > On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > >> Actually for the entire email as it comes across very rambling and
> > >>
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 09:12 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2011-03-21
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET) [1]
> > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Note: Europe still didn't move to summer time, so
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 09:12 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2011-03-21
> # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Foiled by cut'n'paste again! :) Please note the correct date in
$subject.
Thanks,
James
.
Alternatively, feel free to update the meeting wiki page linked below.
See you in #fedora-meeting.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110321
1. Thursday, March 17 - F-15 pre-beta acceptance test
* missed due to bug#684742 and NM-0.9
Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> > Kcharselect crashes when selecting different character
>> encodings. A
>> > generated backtrace is here:
>> Incomplete backgrace, can you fetch qt-debuginfo and try
>> reproducing again?
...
> Thread 1 (Thread 0xb7899780 (LWP 2244)):
> [KCrash Handler]
> #7 0x418cd1
2011/3/21 Genes MailLists
> On 03/21/2011 04:18 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > imho, selecting a few
> > required services (like assigning priorities) and making the others
> > optional may relax the problem, making the system more stable in the
> > long term.
> >
> >
>
> This kinda doesn't m
FYI: this boots into gnome3shell as CD
sugar-desktop can be installed after install to HD or USB (both work).
VirtualBox4.0.4 OSX defaults to fallback gnome2.xxx
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-i386-20110318.01.iso
also installs to 8 GB USB
DO NOT UPDATE rsy
lø., 19.03.2011 kl. 17.29 -0600, skrev Petrus de Calguarium:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > it started by first not rebooting (in a decent timeframe). i disabled
> > akmods, md monitor and abrtd, which all failed, and i'll see what changes
> > after the very long reboot occurs.
>
> How to fix it?
On 03/21/2011 04:18 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> indeed, is a good workaround for now but, leaving aside that it requires
> prior knowledge, the general problem remains.
fair enough
> imho, selecting a few
> required services (like assigning priorities) and making the others
> optional may rel
#161: Proposed Test Day - Preupgrade test day
---+
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Test Day |
2011/3/21 Bruno Wolff III
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 13:18:32 -0700,
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> > It is selinux that is denying the startup, system will work, but you need
> to start with it disabled :(
>
> Starting in permissive mode is enough. Disabling will result in needing to
> do a re
2011/3/21 Petrus de Calguarium
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > can you please tell us the bug number?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689163
>
> Sorry about my description. My initial impressions, when I had made the
> report,
> were incomplete.
>
>
np, thnx a lot.
--
test mailing
64 matches
Mail list logo
