Hi,
There are threads on this list and a Bugzilla report filed.
Can somebody explain what is the current status of it with regard to F15
release declared ready ?
The problem affects /run/user/ and /dev/shm.
As I understand they are a DoS capable attack venues.
There are separate temporary remedi
On 05/18/2011 07:19 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you could pull in a usb hard drive
> and the icon would show on the desktop...
>
> To safely remove the device, you could right click the icon, and choose
> "Safety remove..."
>
> In the new and awesome
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:19 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you could pull in a usb hard
> drive and the icon would show on the desktop...
>
> To safely remove the device, you could right click the icon, and
> choose "Safety remove..."
>
> In the n
Greetings:
I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you could pull in a usb hard drive and
the icon would show on the desktop...
To safely remove the device, you could right click the icon, and choose
"Safety remove..."
In the new and awesome gnome3, there is a way to have the desktop handle
icons
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:54 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Where you lack faith and trust and see inevitable failure on QA
> community's behalf I see a worthy task to be solved a solution to be
> found and even during this release cycle I revived some of that ideas
> and discussed them
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 01:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > to specify the basis on which QA's 'vote' at this meeting is cast. It's
> > really entirely deterministic; there's no discretion involved. If there
> > are open unaddressed blocker
2011/5/17 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 05/18/2011 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> FESCo, and I believe spins sig also believes it should have a say.
>>
>> QA does indeed provide services to the entire distro, but our
>> responsibility is to provide the best QA we can for the things the
>> pro
On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
>> improvement, do say so...
> As a formerly very active QA guy, and less so now since I got a new
> $DAYJOB, I think that this
On 05/18/2011 01:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> to specify the basis on which QA's 'vote' at this meeting is cast. It's
> really entirely deterministic; there's no discretion involved. If there
> are open unaddressed blockers, we do not approve the candidate for
> release. If there are no open una
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
> improvement, do say so...
As a formerly very active QA guy, and less so now since I got a new
$DAYJOB, I think that this makes sense, bit I do have minor concerns
over wha
On 05/18/2011 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> FESCo, and I believe spins sig also believes it should have a say.
>
> QA does indeed provide services to the entire distro, but our
> responsibility is to provide the best QA we can for the things the
> project considers a) vital and then b) importa
Hey, all. So, a concern was raised in passing at today's go/no-go
meeting that we don't have a process to elect or otherwise select
someone to represent QA at go/no-go meetings; usually myself or jlaska
will cast QA's 'vote' at this meeting. I'm not sure it makes sense to
set up a procedure just fo
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:06 -0700, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I currently run F15 beta, and have some issues with Gnome. Is there a
> better than average chance that the "Released Version" will be
> superior to the F15 Beta?
>
> On one hand, I believe so, as the modules with debugging code shou
I currently run F15 beta, and have some issues with Gnome. Is there a better
than average chance that the "Released Version" will be superior to the F15
Beta?
On one hand, I believe so, as the modules with debugging code should be
replaced by optimized module versions, and any bugs repaired si
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:13 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 12:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > I would take it to FESCO.
>
> Fesco it is.
>
> I will post the relevant ticket once I've filed it to this threat for
> other from QA community ( and any other interested pa
On 05/18/2011 12:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I would take it to FESCO.
Fesco it is.
I will post the relevant ticket once I've filed it to this threat for
other from QA community ( and any other interested party ) to cc
themselves upon choose they to do so.
Thanks.
JBG
--
test mailin
2011/5/17 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 05/17/2011 11:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2011 10:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Finally, I have a new proposal for the issue of 'supported' desktops,
which is block
On 05/17/2011 11:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 05/17/2011 10:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Finally, I have a new proposal for the issue of 'supported' desktops,
>>> which is blocking another planned criterion that we've b
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 10:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Finally, I have a new proposal for the issue of 'supported' desktops,
> > which is blocking another planned criterion that we've been meaning to
> > add for a while. I'm now propos
On 05/17/2011 10:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Finally, I have a new proposal for the issue of 'supported' desktops,
> which is blocking another planned criterion that we've been meaning to
> add for a while. I'm now proposing the term 'release-blocking desktops':
> it's simple, it does what it s
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:51 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> On 17 May 2011 22:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:57 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> <--SNIP-->
> > This is a tricky setup to get working; using two adapters at once with
> > RandR is uncommon and I know when we first went to RandR 1.
On 05/17/2011 03:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 03:53 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>> At the Fedora 15 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 15 Final
>> Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on May 24, 2011.
>>
>> Please note that the Fedora 15 Release Wide Readiness Meeting
Compose started at Tue May 17 13:15:46 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
On 05/18/2011 03:53 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> At the Fedora 15 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 15 Final
> Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on May 24, 2011.
>
> Please note that the Fedora 15 Release Wide Readiness Meeting will take
> place on Thursday at 19:00 UTC (3 PM Ea
Hey, folks. Some release criteria stuff!
I've created the F16 criteria pages, copied across from F15. I added
some criteria we agreed on back in October 2010 to the Final page;
somehow we managed not to add these onto the F15 page, but they're in
there now. Those are:
* The final release notes (i
#151: Tests consistent with Criterion
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wik
At the Fedora 15 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 15 Final
Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on May 24, 2011.
Please note that the Fedora 15 Release Wide Readiness Meeting will take
place on Thursday at 19:00 UTC (3 PM Eastern/ 12 PM Pacific) on
irc.freenode.net in #fedora-m
It is very cool if you are running fedora 15 in a VM on virtualbox the newest
version with guest additions seems to run the gnome-shell great. Only problem
is
it seems to 'steal' all input and switching to the host OS is not working. I
have my system setup as multi-user and logging off of Gnome
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdenetwork-4.6.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.27-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/li
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:04 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> >
> > Okay, looks like it's already been there as
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702666
> > and it seems like the issue will be dealt with, although I wonder if in
> Check if you actually have the repo enabled, then.
Not enabled. Don't know what's going on here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Greetings testers,
As requested in ticket#164 [1], a multi-spin DVD ISO image will be
provided along-side Fedora 15. Ideally, this image would be prepared
and tested at each milestone. For Fedora 15, the Multi-Spin DVD image
is not part of the release criteria, and completion of the tests is onl
#164: Multi-spin DVD review
--+-
Reporter: ke4qqq | Owner: jlaska
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Review | Versio
#164: Multi-spin DVD review
--+-
Reporter: ke4qqq | Owner: jlaska
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Review | Versio
On 17 May 2011 22:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:57 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
<--SNIP-->
> This is a tricky setup to get working; using two adapters at once with
> RandR is uncommon and I know when we first went to RandR 1.2 was
> unsupported. I don't know if it's theoretically su
Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) said:
> Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
> possible. Here's what I know:
Note that the applet issues should be obsoleted by the gnome-panel
in updates-testing, slated for 0-day. I have not blocked the packages,
because most of t
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:25 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:19 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > No trouble,
> > but an something inconsistent?
> > during liveCD install to hd.
> >
> > Enter root/admin password (pretend there is a gui here)
> > repeat password.
> >
> > reboot to
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:57 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> Hi, list!
> Recently I installed F15-rc1 on my computer. The machine is AMD Phenom
> with 2 GB of RAM. It has two graphics adapters - one internal,
> integrated into motherboard and the other is PCI-express card. Here's
> the link to motherboard man
On 05/17/2011 08:12 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Steven Stern
> wrote:
>> I don't recall seeing this during boot for F14...
>>
>> >From DEMSG:
>>
>> [ 42.001543] modem-manager[967]: (ttyS1) closing serial port...
>> [ 42.023151] modem-manager[967]: (ttyS1) ser
Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
possible. Here's what I know:
On 05/15/2011 07:03 PM, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun May 15 13:15:23 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> db4o-7.
#193: Update InstallSourceHardDrive test case
-+--
Reporter: kparal | Owner: rhe
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki| Version:
On 05/16/2011 11:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is kind of half a memo-to-self, but of course, the more people who
> help out, the merrier :)
>
> So we have various housekeeping tasks that come under the Bugzappers
> umbrella, and may have been neglected lately:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/
#193: Update InstallSourceHardDrive test case
-+--
Reporter: kparal | Owner: rhe
Type: task| Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki| Version:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Steven Stern
wrote:
> I don't recall seeing this during boot for F14...
>
> >From DEMSG:
>
> [ 42.001543] modem-manager[967]: (ttyS1) closing serial port...
> [ 42.023151] modem-manager[967]: (ttyS1) serial port closed
> [ 42.023301] modem-manager[967]:
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I know there's a bit of a backlog of proposed criteria changes I really
> > > should look at, but wanted to write thi
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:19 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> No trouble,
> but an something inconsistent?
> during liveCD install to hd.
>
> Enter root/admin password (pretend there is a gui here)
> repeat password.
>
> reboot to hd
> firstboot
> add user
> password -:- weak, stong, very stong
> repe
No trouble,
but an something inconsistent?
during liveCD install to hd.
Enter root/admin password (pretend there is a gui here)
repeat password.
reboot to hd
firstboot
add user
password -:- weak, stong, very stong
repeat ..
Why no weakness test for admin password?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UT
Hi, list!
Recently I installed F15-rc1 on my computer. The machine is AMD Phenom
with 2 GB of RAM. It has two graphics adapters - one internal,
integrated into motherboard and the other is PCI-express card. Here's
the link to motherboard manufacturer specifications:
http://www.msi.com/product/mb/74
On 17/05/11 11:12, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> I won't let this into a flamewar … just to comment, that I don't have
> crashing experience with nspluginwrapper either.
>
> Matěj
>
"Doctors differ, patients live or die" :D
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
test mailing list
Dne 17.5.2011 11:31, Frank Murphy napsal(a):
> But, I don't have any i386 on my x86_64 boxes.
> And use Flashblock, with my 64bit flash.
> and my browser doesn't crash.
I won't let this into a flamewar … just to comment, that I don't have
crashing experience with nspluginwrapper either.
Matěj
-
> > As discussed between QA and desktop teams on these lists, I've now
> > dropped the Final release criterion which stated "There must be no
> > ''Other'' menu or category" (referring to the system menus). I also
> > adjusted the desktop menus test case -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Tes
On 17/05/11 10:28, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 16.5.2011 23:30, Frank Murphy napsal(a):
>> rpm -q flash-plugin
>> flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-2.x86_64
>>
>> and less problems without nspluginwrapper.
>
> Yes, except I have
>
> flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386
>
> so you are missing all those (mainly
Dne 16.5.2011 23:30, Frank Murphy napsal(a):
> rpm -q flash-plugin
> flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-2.x86_64
>
> and less problems without nspluginwrapper.
Yes, except I have
flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386
so you are missing all those (mainly security) bugs which have been
fixed in meanwhile.
Compose started at Tue May 17 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.2.14-5.fc15
- Original Message -
> As discussed between QA and desktop teams on these lists, I've now
> dropped the Final release criterion which stated "There must be no
> ''Other'' menu or category" (referring to the system menus). I also
> adjusted the desktop menus test case -
> https://fedoraproje
Greetings testers,
Three Final Release candidates were posted recently, and validation
tests were heavily executed from RC1 to RC3 to verify that they meet the
final release criteria[1]. The FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held later
today based on the status of RC3, whose validation test results
57 matches
Mail list logo
