On 18 May 2011 03:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:51 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
>> On 17 May 2011 22:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:57 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
<--SNIP-->
>
> Cards like this, where there's one DVI jack and one VGA jack on the
> back, are usuall
Looks like bug 666130
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hi,
having problems to add menu items with alacarte to the
Activities->Applications->Systemtools gnome-shell submenu: applications
added here do not appear in this submenu.
After closing alacarte and starting it again, I found these applications
in some (alacarte) submenu called "alacarte ma
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdenetwork-4.6.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.27-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/li
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viewvc-1.1.11-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/syslog-ng-3.2.4-3.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.2.3-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tig
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 10:00 +0800, Eugene Teo wrote:
> I say, local privilege escalations with publicly available exploits, and
> remotely triggerable vulnerabilities. If such an issue is known before
> Final, we should attempt to address it before releasing.
Note, a release criterion would have
Could this message be passed to the webmaster.
>From 1 through 16, if clickable, would save me doing a search, and also allow
>me to respond specifically to one topic via the selected (clicked) message.
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Release criteria updates: desktop question
(Stephen John Smo
After F14->F15 upgrade, Sound Juicer has 7 empty profiles. What do I
need to reinstall to recover the ability to rip CDs to flac?
--
-- Steve
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Wed May 18 13:15:47 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
F15 RC3 installed without any obvious problems.
Failure during attempt to create a virtual machine.
[root@hp ryniker]# virt-install --prompt
What is the name of your virtual machine?
MPLAB
How much RAM should be allocated (in megabytes)?
4096
What would you like to use as the disk (file path)?
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 20:08:53 +0100
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I have managed to install gnome-schedule in F15 Xfce using
> > "rpm -ivh --nodeps gnome-schedule-2.
> >
> > It works fine.
>
> That seems unlikely. ;)
Actually,
On 05/19/2011 02:52 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
>
> I haven't filed one, on the presumption that the known bug is
> still the problem, despite having been supposedly fixed. Wrong?
No idea what bug report you are referring to but you should either
reopen that and supply the information you can o
On Wed, 18 May 2011 20:08:53 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
> I have managed to install gnome-schedule in F15 Xfce using
> "rpm -ivh --nodeps gnome-schedule-2.
>
> It works fine.
That seems unlikely. ;)
> but if I do a "yum update"
> it says "gnme-schedule missing requires of gnome-pytho
On Mon, 16 May 2011 01:46:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 01:02 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
>>
>> After several false tries, I did get a DVD which upgraded my
>> previous release candidate (from preupgrade on F140, or said it had.
>> Fwiw, the situation is unchanged, despite that
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:35 +, JB wrote:
>
> > The end users of F15 are at risk.
> > They should be fully advised what's the danger with this product.
> > After all, it is an open-source project.
> >
> > The issue is serious, because it raises not on
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:17 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings testers,
>
> As requested in ticket#164 [1], a multi-spin DVD ISO image will be
> provided along-side Fedora 15. Ideally, this image would be prepared
> and tested at each milestone. For Fedora 15, the Multi-Spin DVD image
> is no
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:00 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:09 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or any
#151: Tests consistent with Criterion
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wik
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:09 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
> >> improvement, do say so...
> > As a formerly
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 05/18/2011 01:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > to specify the basis on which QA's 'vote' at this meeting is cast. It's
> > > really entirely deterministic; there's
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:35 +, JB wrote:
> The end users of F15 are at risk.
> They should be fully advised what's the danger with this product.
> After all, it is an open-source project.
>
> The issue is serious, because it raises not only technical questions, but also
> internal (Security,
Stephen John Smoogen gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:41, JB gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is Fedora's policy to ship a product that has a known, proven, and
> > discussed DoS attack venue with this potential implication ?
>
> Is this a strawman question or some other rhetorica
I have managed to install gnome-schedule in F15 Xfce using
"rpm -ivh --nodeps gnome-schedule-2.
It works fine.
but if I do a "yum update"
it says "gnme-schedule missing requires of gnome-python2-applet"
how do I switch above line off permanently not "yum -t"
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:41, JB wrote:
>
> Is Fedora's policy to ship a product that has a known, proven, and discussed
> DoS attack venue with this potential implication ?
Is this a strawman question or some other rhetorical device.
But to answer the strawman then the answer would be yes and
2011/5/18 Adam Jackson :
> On 5/18/11 1:14 PM, J B wrote:
>
>> So, even a local DoS could qualify for a security blocker.
>
> Denial of service is not a security issue. Full stop. Those words mean
> different things. Do not conflate them.
IMHO this is a matter of definition. It seems to me that
Hi,
2011/5/18 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:14 +0200, J B wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I don't know if anyone
>> > would want to go as far as making DoS vulns release blocking, but speak
>> > up if you would! (Of course there is again the local/remote distinction
>> > to consider there: 'a
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 5/18/11 1:14 PM, J B wrote:
>
> > So, even a local DoS could qualify for a security blocker.
>
> Denial of service is not a security issue. Full stop. Those words mean
> different things. Do not conflate them.
Well, it's considered
On 5/18/11 1:14 PM, J B wrote:
> So, even a local DoS could qualify for a security blocker.
Denial of service is not a security issue. Full stop. Those words mean
different things. Do not conflate them.
- ajax
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.
You can also use the Disk Utility(my preference). It offers a "Safe Removal"
option
which actually turns the power off to the device.
- "Adam Miller" wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19:28PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you coul
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:14 +0200, J B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I don't know if anyone
> > would want to go as far as making DoS vulns release blocking, but speak
> > up if you would! (Of course there is again the local/remote distinction
> > to consider there: 'all DoS vulns' would be a much tighter st
On 5/18/11 11:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> # There must be no known remote code execution vulnerability which could
> be exploited during installation or during use of a live image shipped
> with the release
Seems reasonable at first glance.
One anecdotal experience: FC5 (wow) shipped with an
Hi,
> I don't know if anyone
> would want to go as far as making DoS vulns release blocking, but speak
> up if you would! (Of course there is again the local/remote distinction
> to consider there: 'all DoS vulns' would be a much tighter standard than
> 'remote DoS vulns').
I think the "use of a
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:28 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 03:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Feedback please! Thanks:)
>
> Given that we ship selinux on by default should this proposal only be
> applicable to exploits/vulnerability that selinux cant catch and prevent
>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:57:17 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> # There must be no known remote code execution vulnerability which could
> be exploited during installation or during use of a live image shipped
> with the release
>
> Points to consider:
I think there may be some remote expl
On 05/18/2011 03:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Feedback please! Thanks:)
Given that we ship selinux on by default should this proposal only be
applicable to exploits/vulnerability that selinux cant catch and prevent
which leaves us with https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 08:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> # There must be no known remote code execution vulnerability which could
> be exploited during installation or during use of a live image shipped
> with the release
>
> Points to consider:
One more 'point to consider' that I forgot: for
Hey, all. The topic of whether and which security issues should block
releases has come up several times before. While we haven't actually had
many really serious security issues to worry about since the
introduction of the current release criteria system, I think it's
certainly something we should
test Digest, Vol 87, Issue 76
Message: 9 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 06:56:14 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III
Subject: Re: F15 install fails on Compaq Presario To:
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R Cc: Fedora Test List
Message-ID:
<20110518115614.ga30...@wolff.to> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-as
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:33:35 -0400,
Tom Callaway wrote:
> Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
> possible. Here's what I know:
>
> > sear-0.6.3-14.fc12.x86_64 requires liberis-1.3.so.15()(64bit)
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sear-0.6.3-18.fc1
On 05/18/2011 02:28 PM, Brian C. Huffman wrote:
> Nevermind. Apparently I just needed to stop and restart office.:-(
Hum I would actually think that was an bug.
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> this issue was discussed first on the devel list then for some odd reason
> it leaked or reappeared here and it got exactly the same responses.
> ...
We as users should be thankful that people brought it up here as well !
Btw, we discuss
Nevermind. Apparently I just needed to stop and restart office. :-(
Sorry to bother.
-b
-Original message-
To: Fedora Test List ;
From: Brian C. Huffman
Sent: Wed 05-18-2011 10:27 am
Subject:Libreoffice doesn't get printers
> I've created printers in F15, but when I t
I've created printers in F15, but when I try to print from libreoffice, the
printers aren't there.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Brian
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I sat down at my desktop this morning and moved the mouse a bit to get
the monitor/screen to come back to life. I have lock desktop disabled.
The monitor came on from stand-by. The top bar of the shell lit up,
saying 11:20 PM and showing my name at the right, with a lock icon next
to it. (11:20
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:40:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Feedback please! :) For reference, the new F16 pages are:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedor
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Joshua Andrews wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> On Tue May 17 21:52:29 UTC 2011 Joshua Andrews wrote:
>> > It is very cool if you are running fedora 15 in a VM on virtualbox the
>> > newest version with guest additions seems to run the gnome-shell grea
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19:28PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x, you could pull in a usb hard drive and
> the icon would show on the desktop...
>
> To safely remove the device, you could right click the icon, and choose
> "Safety remove..."
>
> I
On 05/18/2011 12:02 PM, JB wrote:
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes:
...
The QA community is not a security or an risk assessment team.
We leave that part up to security team which possesses the necessary
skill resource and experience to correctly evaluate and assess any
concern raised
- Original Message
> On Tue May 17 21:52:29 UTC 2011 Joshua Andrews wrote:
> > It is very cool if you are running fedora 15 in a VM on virtualbox the
> > newest version with guest additions seems to run the gnome-shell great.
>
> Are you referring to virtualbox as provided by rpmfusi
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> The QA community is not a security or an risk assessment team.
>
> We leave that part up to security team which possesses the necessary
> skill resource and experience to correctly evaluate and assess any
> concern raised related security ( or
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 04:41:40 -0700,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> DVD loading complains about MSI quirk and disables MSI subordinate.
> It then locks up trying to load rootfs image
>
> This is on a 512 mb Compaq Presario V-5000 with Athlon 64 which dual boots
> XP and an older vers
DVD loading complains about MSI quirk and disables MSI subordinate.
It then locks up trying to load rootfs image
This is on a 512 mb Compaq Presario V-5000 with Athlon 64 which dual boots
XP and an older version of Fedora. I am installing xubuntu 64 11.04 on
this machine as I type this.
--
Chu
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:40:53PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Tue May 17 21:52:29 UTC 2011 Joshua Andrews wrote:
> > It is very cool if you are running fedora 15 in a VM on virtualbox the
> > newest version with guest additions seems to run the gnome-shell great.
>
> Are you referring to
On 05/18/2011 09:41 AM, JB wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>>> Was that considered to be a blocker and a part of release criteria for F15 ?
>> Nope. As discussed recently (I think, though I can't find it right now,
>> if anyone has a link that'd be great) on the devel list,
On 05/18/2011 04:02 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> On Wed May 18 08:55:52 UTC 2011 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> In addition to that, gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu (in Fedora 15 repo)
>> can be useful here.
> Can you elaborate this, Rahul, please?
>
> yum search gnome-shell-extension gives to me o
spin-kickstarts-0.15.6-1.fc15 has been built with the state used for RC3.
It does not include the LXDE commit from after RC3. If a new LXDE is
built before release then we should probably do another build before
release. Same if SOAS has and ks changes before it is built. Otherwise
I'll do another
I did check the checksum and it passed. I also did the CD test at the
beginning of anaconda process and it als passed.
Koos
Op 16-5-2011 22:17, Adam Williamson schreef:
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:20 +0200, A.J. Werkman wrote:
I tried to install F15 RC3 twice from the DVD. The installation hung
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 15:40:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> * A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files
> used to build the release must be present in the release repository. The
> included kickstarts must define the correct set of release repositories
This is tric
On Tue May 17 21:52:29 UTC 2011 Joshua Andrews wrote:
> It is very cool if you are running fedora 15 in a VM on virtualbox the
> newest version with guest additions seems to run the gnome-shell great.
Are you referring to virtualbox as provided by rpmfusion, so
VirtualBox-OSE-4.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 17:21:57 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> FESCo, and I believe spins sig also believes it should have a say.
Note that Spins SIG is still pretty dysfunctional.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Wed May 18 06:19:28 UTC 2011 Rob Healey wrote
> I remember that in the old Gnome 2.x
[snip]
> To safely remove the device, you could right click the icon, and choose
> "Safety remove..."
On Wed May 18 06:26:20 UTC 2011 Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's an 'eject' button next to it in the file m
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> ...
> > Was that considered to be a blocker and a part of release criteria for F15 ?
>
> Nope. As discussed recently (I think, though I can't find it right now,
> if anyone has a link that'd be great) on the devel list, this isn't
> really anything new: jus
Compose started at Wed May 18 08:15:03 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
R-Rsolid-0.9.31-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libhdf5.so.6()(64bit)
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64
On 05/18/2011 11:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:19 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
>> Can someone tell me how to handle this situation the correct gnome3
>> way?
> There's an 'eject' button next to it in the file manager, which more or
> less does this (it actually does something
Hi
2011/5/18 JB :
> Hi,
>
> There are threads on this list and a Bugzilla report filed.
>
> Can somebody explain what is the current status of it with regard to F15
> release declared ready ?
>
> The problem affects /run/user/ and /dev/shm.
> As I understand they are a DoS capable attack venues.
>
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 06:31 +, JB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are threads on this list and a Bugzilla report filed.
>
> Can somebody explain what is the current status of it with regard to F15
> release declared ready ?
Yup, indeed there are.
> The problem affects /run/user/ and /dev/shm.
> As I
67 matches
Mail list logo
