#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Hi all,
I would like to just shortly re-introduce myself. Last week I rejoined Fedora
QA team after 5 months spent as an exchange student in Denmark. In upcoming
months I will be busy with rpm packaging, notably autotest, and helping with
developing AutoQA. I am looking forward to working with
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance test
run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately that the
rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please refer to the
bug 723144. Let's expect the exciting
Dne 18.7.2011 07:51, Sudhir Dharanendraiah napsal(a):
My name is Sudhir and I'm from India (GMT +5:30). Being in the Quality
team for over 5 years, dealing with bugs has become part of my IT career
life. I was associated with data center support in the early part of my
career. I have vast
Compose started at Tue Jul 19 08:15:24 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
#224: Joining proventesters request
-+--
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone:
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor|
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote:
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance test
run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately that the
rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor|
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: minor|
Greetings!
Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
this one instead).
Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
In a nutshell, we are looking for better ways to test our Anaconda
based
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:49 +0200, Sergio Rubio wrote:
Greetings!
Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
this one instead).
Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
In a
The 7/18 64 bit electronic-lab live dvd fails hard disk
install with an unhandled exception.
Gnome 3 fails to load. System is an Nvidia GTX 460 SE
on Intel i5 with 8 GB ram.
On restart, the live Linux should eject the disc,
or at least unlock the eject button.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
On 07/19/2011 09:49 AM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
Greetings!
Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
this one instead).
Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
In a nutshell, we
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
interpreter: No such file or directory
Is there a trick to get this to run?
--
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:06 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2011 11:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth. It installs and
runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither Fedora 14 or Fedora 15
would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2011 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Conclusion: try 'yum install redhat-lsb'.
Adam,
yum provides /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
Is another way to find the package.
Kevin
- --
Get my public GnuPG key from
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:14 -0600, Kevin DeKorte wrote:
On 07/19/2011 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Conclusion: try 'yum install redhat-lsb'.
Adam,
yum provides /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
Is another way to find the package.
I have a philosophical objection to file-based dependencies,
Hi, folks. The Test Day cycle for Fedora 16 will open shortly, and we're
putting out the call for anyone who has an idea for a Test Day. There
are many open slots on the schedule -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_16_test_days - and if they all
fill up or you would like to run a set of
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin:
#225: Request for F16 Power Management test day
-+--
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major|
Hey,
Thank you guys for the quick reply. Comments inline.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Cool, we're always looking for ways to do better testing. As James said,
honqing and twu are more actively working on the installer automation
but I have a couple of
On 07/19/2011 12:50 PM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
Hey,
Thank you guys for the quick reply. Comments inline.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Tim Flinktfl...@redhat.com wrote:
Cool, we're always looking for ways to do better testing. As James said,
honqing and twu are more actively working on
Michael Cronenworth on 07/19/2011 04:36 PM wrote:
I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB
5.0 bodhi update.
Nevermind. After looking at *closed* tickets, I found it.
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4828
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 03:28:09 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/20/2011 01:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth:
On 07/20/2011 07:11 AM, Peter Reed wrote:
This will not resolve the dependency problem. It requires all the i686
packages not the x86_64 packages I do not think it is a true x86_64 based
package. I would have to run it each time to see what the next depency it
would fail on and install
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 00:16, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 07/20/2011 07:11 AM, Peter Reed wrote:
This will not resolve the dependency problem. It requires all the i686
packages not the x86_64 packages I do not think it is a true x86_64 based
package. I would have to run it
Hi, folks. The Test Day cycle for Fedora 16 will open shortly, and we're
putting out the call for anyone who has an idea for a Test Day. There
are many open slots on the schedule -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_16_test_days - and if they all
fill up or you would like to run a set of
31 matches
Mail list logo
