#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolu
On 07/22/2011 06:28 AM, agraham wrote:
Rahul, I did not accuse you of anything except your outstanding
contribution. I did say "I really get the feeling there is another agenda at
work here" and what I was hinting at, was that Redhat are setting the Fedora
agenda such that it NEVER becomes stabl
Hello,
I've created a draft for Ovirt Node validation matrix:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athmane/Draft_Ovirt_Node_validation_matrix
Tomorrow I'll create collectd test case, also I would ask if there's a
pre-built iso for testing (I need it to ensure that nothing is wrong
with test mat
On 07/21/2011 10:58 AM, Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 11:26 AM, agraham wrote:
>
> Replying here only once, this is not content for test@ IMHO
>
>> I disagree with the propaganda pumped out by RH et al about Fedora being
>> a only test bed for RHEL.
>
> I don't know who is telling that, but
On 07/21/2011 12:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that
>> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years
>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :(
>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 16:10, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 10:26 AM, agraham wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
anything as far as I can tel
> On 07/21/2011 04:33 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates.
>
> I think it is due to the fact that there hasn't been a push for a few
> days. I'll wait for a push before raising hell.
What he said. It's been retagged, but without a
On 07/21/2011 10:26 AM, agraham wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>>> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
>>> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
>>> are greyed out.
>>>
>>> How i
On 07/21/2011 04:33 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates.
I think it is due to the fact that there hasn't been a push for a few
days. I'll wait for a push before raising hell.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 07/19/2011 03:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth on 07/19/2011 04:36 PM wrote:
>> I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB
>> 5.0 bodhi update.
>
> Nevermind. After looking at *closed* tickets, I found it.
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/t
Greetings all,
As a follow-up to my discussion on documenting release criteria for
secondary architectures [1], I've come up with a draft which implements
approach#4 - wiki templates. The approach doesn't seem horrible to me,
but I tend to spend a fair amount of time fiddling with wiki anyway.
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:43 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> It would be more accurate to say "The current Fedora releases are not
> typically used as servers." I expect many are like me and use an older
> Fedora release on servers: F9 in my case, because it does its job well
> and any limitations
On 07/20/2011 08:23 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
> are greyed out.
>
> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
> if services can not be enabled?
>
I know that Nils Ph
It would be more accurate to say "The current Fedora releases are not
typically used as servers." I expect many are like me and use an older
Fedora release on servers: F9 in my case, because it does its job well
and any limitations do not impair its function.
It seems perfectly reasonable to exp
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-07-22
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
!!! ALL-CAPS RED-ALERT OMG LOL !!!
Fedora 16 Alpha test compose is less than *one* week away (Jul 26) and
F16 Alpha isn't far behind
On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>
>
> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that
> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :(
It should concern you very much that you are accusing
On 07/21/2011 11:26 AM, agraham wrote:
Replying here only once, this is not content for test@ IMHO
> I disagree with the propaganda pumped out by RH et al about Fedora being
> a only test bed for RHEL.
I don't know who is telling that, but people at Red Hat for sure do not.
We think of Fedora a
On 07/20/2011 09:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>> Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
>> anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
>> are greyed out.
>>
>> How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
>>
18 matches
Mail list logo
