Hi, Frank,
I just tested the preupgrade from f14 and f15 to f16, this also happened.
That is because the mirrorlist address is not correct, you can update it as
below:
baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/x86_64/os/
Downloaded Fedora 16 Alpha TC1 netinstall iso x86_64 for a first brief
look. Booted the included isolinux kernel+initrd. Cancelled the first
LUKS passphrase prompt, but entered the passphrase for an experimental
/home LV, which is shared by several dist releases on this machine. Had
to enter it a
Hello all,
The stable release of pygobject2 does not support the latest versions
of gobject-introspection (that we ship in F-16 and Rawhide); this is
exposed by e.g. gnome-tweak-tool not working; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719791 for details.
Mageia has a fix for this
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Pressing any taskinfo URL in the Link column of the page
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/;
produces following error:
Error
An error has occurred while processing your request.
ValueError: invalid literal
Hello,
I just wanted to let everyone know that I've made a number of tests available
for
assessing security of the distribution. It is by no means a comprehensive
auditing
tool, but the scripts definitely find problems.
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/
On this list, the rpm-chksec
Compose started at Wed Aug 3 13:15:48 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:30 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Pressing any taskinfo URL in the Link column of the page
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/;
produces following error:
Error
An error has
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.10-70.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-3.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.4-5.fc15
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.10-78.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
for post-Alpha TC1.
We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
By policy, we can't call a build an RC until all known blockers are
On 08/03/2011 08:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
for post-Alpha TC1.
We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
By policy, we can't
Honestly I rather having the extra TC build to weed out any potential
blocker that could arise during fixing and spinning of the known blockers.
I've seen that happen in the past and an extra spin can help make sure RC is
better at the start.
-- John Watzke
On Aug 3, 2011 8:12 PM, Clyde E.
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
I suspect this is vacation time for many, so a longer slip might be in
the offing.
No-one gets any vacation while there are still open blockers. ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora |
Could we get a respin of TC1 that can install
the software development choice without
missing files?
If there is a URL that actually works for a net install,
could someone post it exactly?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:29:00 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
I just wanted to let everyone know that I've made a number of tests
available for assessing security of the distribution. It is by no means
a comprehensive auditing tool, but the scripts definitely find problems.
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:29:00 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
Looks like interesting stuff. Would any of these be appropriate to be
integrated into AutoQA so they could be run regularly?
One thing I want to emphasize, every single script on that page found real
problems in
F15. I opened
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:09 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:29:00 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
I just wanted to let everyone know that I've made a number of tests
available for assessing security of the distribution. It is by no means
a comprehensive auditing
Hello All,
I have tried to install the FC16 Alpha TC1 on VMWare virtual machine, after
selecting the hard disk for the portioning getting the error message as no
usable disk has found. Any clue what I am missing here??
BTW it's detecting the harddisk and showing it's size also (20 GB) in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
