The Aug 9 RC2 dis not throw an unhandled exception when
"basic storage devices" looked at my main HD with a variety
of Linux and Windows systems on it.
But it did complain that swap areas lacked UUID protection.
(What's wrong with looking at the partition ID?)
So I dutifully told the installer to
Hi,
Anybody sees this too:
After downloading the F16/TC2 x86_64 desktop ISO and burning it, I
booted from the CD media: No GDM after boot, the last messsage on the
console is "Started D-Bus System Message Bus". The ribbon on the buttom
of the screen is completely white (this took much time!!) . N
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.11-79.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cl
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-3.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.11-71.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.4-5.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolu
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:39 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I don't see how it can be a "go" if Live doesn't work without
> enforcing=0:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863
>
> I'm surprised RC3 was rushed so quickly with no resoution to this. I
> expect an RC4 will be necessa
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bugzilla-4.0.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.8.4-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On 08/09/2011 10:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>
> if its failing please file a bug. we cant fix the issue if we do not know
> about
> it.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
bz 729457 filed.
723047 filed previously.
There are a lot of other anaconda issues (bzs filed) and when I finally
got an install done,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:05:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3
> > (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> > download links and te
On 08/09/2011 11:46 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Keywords: pattern after, might.
Can fit these words into pretty much anything really.
>
> I suspect the actual *buntu problem may be in parted, not debian-installer.
Ubiquity is the default Ubuntu installer, Not d-i
> Does Anaconda not used pa
On 2011/08/09 23:36 (GMT+0530) Rahul Sundaram composed:
> Felix Miata wrote
>> The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2
>> installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM
>> information situated in the sector preceding
> Don't assume that. T
On 08/09/2011 11:26 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2
> installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM
> information situated in the sector preceding
Don't assume that. The implementation of the installer is e
On 2011/08/09 13:34 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
>> for making anything so poorly documented the default anything, much less an
>> only anything.
> https
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/08/09 10:01 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
>
> > I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> > installations, only grub2 will be used.
>
> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3
> (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
> images arrive a few hours
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 09:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do package
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
> > I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> > installations, only grub2 will be used.
>
> Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
> for making anything so poorly documented the default anything, much less an
> only anything.
I
On 2011/08/09 10:01 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
> I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> installations, only grub2 will be used.
Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
for making anything so poorly documented the default
On 08/09/2011 10:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 08:08:33 AM Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 08:08:33 AM Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do pa
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 09:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do package
#79: Add firstboot release criteria
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki
On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
>> bootloader?
>
> no. but you could do package customization, de-select grub2, and select
> grub. (haven't tested thi
24 matches
Mail list logo
