On 08/16/2011 11:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
VGA= is not a kickstart setting it's an kernel command line parameter
and with grub2 you need to use "set gfxpayload=$your-desired-resolution"
instead.
You can find
Hello everyone,
I saw Fedora 16 Alpha RC5 LXDE and XFCE live isos don't have
libreport-plugin-bugzilla and libreort-plugin-logger so that you cannot select
report methods in the SELinux Alert Browser.
It would be nice to be installed by default in both live images.
# Gnome and KDE live isos have
Thanks Andre! So far RC5 works fine for me, it fixes the selinux issue
on x86_64[1] and saving traceback to bugzilla problem[2]. So anyone
wants to try it, go ahead and help testing!
Thanks!
Hurry
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730863
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On 2011/08/16 19:21 (GMT-0400) Benjamin Kosnik composed:
> Yeah. That's right. I'm psyched to have this in fedora.
Not me.
> This will hopefully allow fedora to deal with GPT in a saner and
> more-up-to-date way, thus resolving many bugzilla reports.
But you get a vastly larger set of bugs wit
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:09:20 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> (In defense of Ubuntu, it's just using the upstream way, just as
> Debian - and even Fedora - does when you use
> grub-mkconfig/grub2-mkconfig.)
I know, that's why I suspect that same horror will be
perpetrated in fedora 16.
--
test mailing list
Hello,
My name is Grady E. Rein. I am a rising High School Senior. I've had about 2
years worth of Linux experience and about a year and a half with Fedora/RPM
based Linux. My nick in IRC is Gr72 if you wish to contact me. As for area
I would liek to work in I don't have a preference. Wherever yo
**IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less
than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00
PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then.
Thanks.
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5
(RC5) i
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
For example, I installed F16 through kickstart yesterday with
"vga=794", which adds it to the "linux ..." line. I get correct
resolution but I also get a boot message that using "vga=..." is
deprecated and tha
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolu
Yeah. That's right. I'm psyched to have this in fedora.
This will hopefully allow fedora to deal with GPT in a saner and
more-up-to-date way, thus resolving many bugzilla reports.
Including some of the interoperability issues with fedora/mac dual boot.
Yay.
-benjamin
--
test mailing list
#232: Virtualization Test Day
--+-
Reporter: jforbes | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
> fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
>
> I hope it is packaged and updated totally differently
> from the version in ubuntu, because the ubuntu
> version is a nightmare.
>
> Do we still
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 15:50, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
> fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
This is widely off-topic and not written in a manner that really
allows for either a conversation or a poor response. Here is a better
way of stating
ried installing the RC4 DVD two ways - custom disk layout
and replace linux system. Used basic video driver.
Repaired boot loader with Ubuntu grub builder.
In both cases, a number of avc errors were reported during bootup.
Then a number of services failed to start.
Finally RC4 hangs after repor
Hey, folks. Just a quick heads-up to expect F16 Alpha RC5 within the
next hour or two. We have the go/no-go meeting (again) tomorrow so we're
really squeezed for time in validating this, if people could help out
with testing that'd be great. The official announcement on test-announce
will have all
I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
I hope it is packaged and updated totally differently
from the version in ubuntu, because the ubuntu
version is a nightmare.
Do we still have to edit random files then run
update-grub to build the actual co
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:38:35 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> Ahead of an RC5 release, I created an unofficial netinstall iso with
> the new libreport and anaconda builds.
> * http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso
> * http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso.sha256
>
> If anyone
Ahead of an RC5 release, I created an unofficial netinstall iso with
the new libreport and anaconda builds.
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso
* http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso.sha256
If anyone has the time and inclination to test that boot.iso and,
assuming
On 08/16/2011 01:16 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> I've just tried F16 alpha rc4. Installation went without a hitch but
> unfortunately the system still hangs when grub tries to boot. BZ#
> 730124.
>
> Any pointer how to get past this would be appreciated.
>
> Jurgen
>
If you have another installation
Hi,
booting the 32 Bit Gnome Live CD drops to textmode.
blockdev
invalid format on line 1 of table on stdin
command failes
Usage: blockdev -v -q .
invalid format on line 1 of table on stdin
command failes
ln: failes to create symbolic link '/dev/root': File exists
dracut Wanung: No
On 08/16/2011 01:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 10:06 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>>>
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and bot
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.9.6. This release has fixes for bugs found in 1.2.9
testing and bugs from earlier releases.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.1, the 389-ds-base package is included in the base
OS. It is the same as the upstream,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:10:27 -0700
> Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
>
>
>> It is my understanding that the majority of desktop machines run
>> Nvidia or ATI graphics cards.
>> It is a fact of life that Gnome 3 in its present incarnation will not
>>
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:28 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I'm not saying everything is a blocker--only the inability to install
> the DVD. Heck, you can't even boot a desktop spin that has been
> installed due to grub2 errors and since there is a good workaround for
> that it isn't a blocker
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 10:06 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
> >> should be alpha blockers.
> >
> > 727966 re
I've just tried F16 alpha rc4. Installation went without a hitch but
unfortunately the system still hangs when grub tries to boot. BZ#
730124.
Any pointer how to get past this would be appreciated.
Jurgen
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapr
On 08/16/2011 11:12 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:06, Clyde E. Kunkel
> wrote:
>> On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>>>
Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply an
Compose started at Tue Aug 16 13:15:36 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:06, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
>>> should be alpha blockers.
>>
>> 727966 requires cus
On 08/15/2011 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 21:38 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
>>
>> Still not installable for me. Bzs 727966 and 723167 apply and both
>> should be alpha blockers.
>
> 727966 requires custom layout, which makes it Final, not Alpha. 723167
> is suppose
>
> > Also, need a tag for 16-Alpha in bugzilla,
> > for auto reporting of tracebacks.
>
> Not sure what you mean by that.
That's this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730887
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
> > I don't know how Steve's tests behave, but:
> > 1. We can't run destructive tests (uninstalling packages, deleting
> > system
> > files, stopping services).
>
> All are read only. I have several more that do stuff like start each
> servoce and scan
> the audit logs for AVCS, then stop all serv
If using F16/Alpha/RC4/live for "install to harddisk", (I selected an
extended partition for that), the installer fails on "writing bootloader
to partititon", so I can't boot that installed F16. See BZ 730915).
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
On 08/16/2011 11:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> If using F16/Alpha/RC4/live for "install to harddisk", (I selected an
> extended partition for that), the installer fails on "writing bootloader
> to partititon", so I can't boot that installed F16. See BZ 730915).
>
>
>
>
> This body part will be
If using F16/Alpha/RC4/live for "install to harddisk", (I selected an
extended partition for that), the installer fails on "writing bootloader
to partititon", so I can't boot that installed F16. See BZ 730915).
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
35 matches
Mail list logo
