Hi,
after having updated to kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.git7.2.fc16.x86_64, missing
sound! Sound OK with kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64!
Audio:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition
Audio Controller (rev 01)
Loaded sound odules with running
Should we expect this in rawhide? Runs for 15 minutes like this.
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 23 August 2011 15:43, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
Should we expect this in rawhide? Runs for 15 minutes like this.
No, file a bug. :-)
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#234: Fedora Packager for Eclipse F16 test day.
---+
Reporter: arobinso | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day |
Because of some reasons, *aisleriot-solitaire* from gnome-games was
lost. Somebody can help? Reinstall of gnome-games does'nt re-install it:-(
Kind regards
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Compose started at Tue Aug 23 13:15:24 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed
to boot. The installation DVD kernel 3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 is the only
one that boots. I've attempted to boot with these with no luck:
kernel-3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64
Not yet present. However, the OpenSuSE has an rpm for aisleriot-3.1.0 I had to
force installation due to the lack of a glib2-tools package in F16, but my card
games appear to be back
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
#235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types
-+--
Reporter: dlehman | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.4.8-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.10.2-4.fc15
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.4.8-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
cornel panceac wrote:
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere?
Yes. It was announced on all of the announce mailing lists. You have
to be subscribed to them to see the e-mail.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:53:01 +0300
cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com wrote:
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere?
Yes.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-August/002992.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-August/000828.html
The announce
2011/8/23 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:53:01 +0300
cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com wrote:
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere?
Yes.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-August/002992.html
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.5.0-6.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.10.2-4.fc16
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
+---
Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac|
Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha
that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs
work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess...
kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex
kickstart files that do a lot of stuff.
On 08/23/2011 09:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha
that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs
work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess...
kickstart is a very broad area; you can write
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac|
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac|
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Trac|
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jurgen Kramer gtmkra...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed
to boot. The installation DVD kernel 3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 is the only
one that boots.
Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop [A]- install problems:
I could not use the install to HD Icon in gnome3-shell to install to the
usb HD [B]
These all failed for me:
1-)use default settings
2-) use whole disk (no LVM)
3-) custom with / ext 4 1000 /23 and swap
This finally worked:
4-) format
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Andy Lawrence dr.die...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jurgen Kramer gtmkra...@xs4all.nlwrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed
to boot. The
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 15:12 -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop [A]- install problems:
I could not use the install to HD Icon in gnome3-shell to install to the
usb HD [B]
These all failed for me:
1-)use default settings
2-) use whole disk (no LVM)
3-) custom
On 08/23/2011 06:49 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
\
According to this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2
grub2 is used by default with F16, so I'm gonna guess that's what I'm using!
I tried this: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which does give
parameters in
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
#226: Create F16 install test plan and test result template
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: rhe
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki |
#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority:
31 matches
Mail list logo