I installed (rpm -ivh) kernel-PAE on a Fedora 16α system.
I changed /etc/sysconfig/kernel: DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-PAE
The new kernel-PAE shows up in grub.cfg, but some things are not quite how they
should be:
- the menu entry for kernel-PAE is not of the same format as the other lines
- the echo
Hi,
can't find qmake on my F16-Alpha box. The rpm
qt-4.8.0-0.9.beta1.fc16.x86_64 is installed. I found qmake in F15 in
/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake, but it's not there in F16.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description:
I have reported https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862 for an
issue with 3.1 kernels crashing, typically on the order of hours after
booting. Based on some names in the traceback, I suspect this is MD raid
or luks related.
I reported this upstream, since that seems to be a better place
Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Peter G. pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
- no rescue mode menu entry for the kernel-PAE was created
Because grubby only creates one entry when a new kernel's installed;
grub2-mkconfig ... creates a regular entry and a single one
I just ran
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 14:55:15 +0200,
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
Hi,
can't find qmake on my F16-Alpha box. The rpm
qt-4.8.0-0.9.beta1.fc16.x86_64 is installed. I found qmake in F15 in
/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake, but it's not there in F16.
The short answer is
Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it.
Now it's hitting me badly everytime I boot F16 Alpha. Sometimes the
second login attempt succeeds, sometimes it doesn't and needs
a third attempt.
gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Where do I search for meaningful error messages?
Attached
Michael,
I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card. Could you
review your messages logs for entries containing :
* page flip
* unable to schedule IB
* wait for fifo failed
... associated with drm or radeon.
You might be having the same problem as myself
Pat.
On 08/28/2011
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:12:27 -0400, PD (Patrick) wrote:
I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card.
This is with Radeon HD 3450 (aka RV620).
Could you
review your messages logs for entries containing :
* page flip
* unable to schedule IB
* wait for fifo failed
...
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:12:27 -0400, PD (Patrick) wrote:
I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card.
This is with Radeon HD 3450 (aka RV620).
Could you
review your messages logs for entries
$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
to browse pages at http://bikemap.net
This is _without_ Adobe's Flash plugin in case that matters.
Can anyone confirm?
If so, the current test
On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
to browse pages at http://bikemap.net
This is _without_ Adobe's Flash plugin in case that
Tom H wrote:
I wasn't implying that you had.
I never got the impression that you were implying that I had changed the file
:-)
I thought you were stating that I _must_ change the file to get the result I
wanted :-)
I was only pointing out that some people - like me - do so
I looked at the
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:46:30 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
to browse pages at
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:02:16 +0200, MS (Michael) wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:46:30 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
crashes for me (and opens its own
Dne 28.8.2011 16:43, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
I reported this upstream, since that seems to be a better place to get
attention for development kernel bugs, than Fedora's tracker. However,
if this should be considered a beta blocker, then I should probably also
make a Fedora bug entry so that
From: br...@wolff.to
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Should I make a tracking bug in fedora for problem reported upstream?
I have reported https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862 for an
issue with 3.1 kernels crashing, typically on the order of hours after
booting.
Still after the most recent updates on my box:
[
Aug 29 05:52:29 Updated: evolution-data-server-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:30 Installed: p11-kit-0.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:31 Updated: gnome-keyring-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:32 Updated: gnome-menus-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29
Sometimes, if I try to reboot my box by the gnome-shell (user button top
right-poweroff-restart), the box hangs, and the reboot seems to fail.
In all these cases, I have to press the power button or the reset button.
On the other hand, rebooting from some tty (by ctrl+alt+del) *always*
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 22:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it.
What exactly is the point of the Oh no! screen anyway?
Jon.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
In the system-config-services, I see that sshd is not running when I boot the
computer.
The message at the top right says that:
The sshd service is managed by systemd. It may be started then run in the
background, or be activated on demand...
I am unclear about the be activated on demand
20 matches
Mail list logo
