The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-FCGI-0.74-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-21.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-1.3.1-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/d
Can't get a display manager due to above error with
systemd-36-2.fc16.x86_64. Leaves system hanging until C-A-Del reboot.
Had to revert to systemd-35-1.fc16.x86_64.
BZ 741078
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Matthias Clasen writes:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 09:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > > Beware the gigantic gnome 3.1.92 update. Something in this
> > > transaction broke the ability for me to log in at all via GDM. You
> > > type you
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 14:57 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, used entire disk, DVD install. Had F15 installed before. After
> > installation, all defaults, minimal install (Tried Gnome the first few
> > times, then minimal to sp
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 14:57 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
> Yes, used entire disk, DVD install. Had F15 installed before. After
> installation, all defaults, minimal install (Tried Gnome the first few
> times, then minimal to speed things up), the bios finds no boot disk.
> Happy to do it agai
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:23, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > I have tried every possible option, after installation my Thinkpad T520
> will
> > not find anything bootable. I've attempted with only legacy boot in the
> > BIOS and
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:23, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> I have tried every possible option, after installation my Thinkpad T520 will
> not find anything bootable. I've attempted with only legacy boot in the
> BIOS and only UEFI.
> I've tried with the normal lvm standards, custom, etc. My boot
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 12:23 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 00:22 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
> > Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for
> Installation [2],
>
On 09/23/2011 03:13 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Sigh. I've been running Rawhide for a very long time. As of the last
> year or so, though, almost every post I make draws a response like
> this. I'm dense, I'll admit, but I'm getting the hint. Rawhide
> probably does not have much of a future on th
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 00:22 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
> > Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2],
> > Base [3], Desktop [4], and Security Lab [5] should pass in order to meet
> > the Beta Release Criteria
Compose started at Sat Sep 24 08:15:20 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Where does gnome3 system info get its device name? (System
Settings->System Info->Overview) On my test machine it is always empty,
it just shows a rectangular box with no text.
All the other fields (Memory, processor etc) are filled.
Jurgen
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:24:09 -0400, MC (Matthias) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 11:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > The gnome guys have been mostly working in f16, so this stuff won't show
> > up in rawhide until the updates hit stable. (Right now they are in
> > updates-testing.) They sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
