On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 23:47 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> well that is a new bug :-)
this is what we in QA refer to as 'progress' ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing li
Hi Adam,
Thanks again.
> Sounds like one. Boot until it fails then poke around at 'systemctl
> status nfs-server.service'
[root@marbles ~]# systemctl status nfs-server.service
nfs-server.service - NFS Server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled)
Active: inactive
> x86_64 minimal boot.iso:
> http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20111011_preTC1.x64.boot.iso
Installed that as Xen DomU (fully virtualized - HVM) and it installs fine
and boots fine. Albeit the network seems to have gone away - had to run
/etc/init.d/network restart to get it back.
> http://tflin
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 20:05 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 19:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. So, currently the Beta criteria state:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods"
> >
> > This is probably over-ambitious for Beta.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 19:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, currently the Beta criteria state:
>
> "The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods"
>
> This is probably over-ambitious for Beta. We have some pretty odd
> kickstart delivery methods:
>
> https://fedorapr
Hey, folks. So, currently the Beta criteria state:
"The installer must be able to use all kickstart delivery methods"
This is probably over-ambitious for Beta. We have some pretty odd
kickstart delivery methods:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_File_Path_Ks_Cfg
https://fedora
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 16:17 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> The Printing Test Day last week was successful in identifying 12 bugs,
> across gnome-settings-daemon, control-center, gutenprint, hplip, and
> firefox.
>
> Thanks to those who took part.
Thanks for running the event, Tim, sorry if we gave it
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:17 -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> Beta 16 on Dell E1405 is borderline unusable because of screen
> dimming. I can use the appropriate Fn key to brighten the screen,
> but it doesn't stay bright very long. Worse/stranger: If after
> increasing brightness I wait a minute or tw
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:24 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Network Manager applet faulty (forgets previously added connections)
> on 3G connections, on Gnome-Shell.
>
> How to reproduce:
> * plug 3G dongle
> * add a new connection ( using nm-connection-editor )
> * connect to it.
> * disconnect
>
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:49 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a nvidia NVD9 (GY520 on a laptop... GF119 chipset) that
> currently is not supported in f15
> (xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-24.20110324git8378443.fc15)
> The chipset was probably added around mid may in nouveau git repo...
>
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 14:06 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> Copying main.conf into input.conf got rid of the 'file not found'
> messages but still timeouts trying to connect to the device.
I don't think the files are a problem, they'd just be read if they
happened to be present. The problem is som
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Anybody else seeing anything like this? Known issue? Open bug?
I'd say it's a 'known issue' in the sense that every freaking 'desktop
search' mechanism I've ever come across has been riddled with bugs like
this, yet people keep writing t
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 15:34 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Sorry if this has been covered already, I just turned my list
> subscription back on.
>
> Gnucash just segfaulted on me. It clearly shows the segfault
> in /var/log/messages and dmesg, but abrtd didn't do anything. It
> appears to be runn
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 12:07 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I did a yum distro-sync upgrade last night from F15 to F16 beta on my
> x86_64 desktop with an ASUS P5Q SE2 motherboard. Here are the problems
> I encountered and my initial impressions.
>
> I've been away from this list for a while, so f
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
grub-efi installed or else your system won't boot any more. So, if you
have an EFI install, inst
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
> What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
> grub and
> you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the
> rush and do
> it now - install grub2, remove grub (you can u
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:29 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 01:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace grub and
> > you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the rush and do
> > it now - install grub2, remov
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 13:21 -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Michael Schwendt writes:
> > The symlink target is read-only as another reminder that one should
> > not edit it with an editor but only via the fragments in /etc/grub.d/
> >
> > --
>
> Seems clear enough, as is also the unambiguous header
Rob Healey wrote:
> Would you please explain this to me???
It's a meta package to setup wine correctly on your system. There are so
few 64-bit Windows programs that you need the 32-bit wine binaries.
Nothing is stopping you from custom installing wine (yum install
wine-wow.x86_64 I think) to on
Greetings:
Would you please explain this to me???
This is the yum output for when i am trying to install wine on my 64bit ...
Installing:
wine x86_64
1.3.29-1.fc16 updates-testing 35 k
Installing for dependencies:
al
It feels like we just got done with beta testing, but it's time for
some F16 pre-final TC1 testing!
We have new builds for anaconda, parted and lorax that could use some
karma.
If you can successfully install, please give karma to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-16.4.6-1.fc16
https
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for upda
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 05:07 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > Open a console and run 'liveinst', that's the only way we
> > can actually
> > tell why it's not running.
> > --
>
> Thank you very much Adam for your input. Here's what comes out:
>
> [liveuser@localhost ~]$ liveinst
>
> ^C
> [li
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 01:11 -0700, Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> It's nfs-server.service .
>
>
> Thanks a lot. That got me on the right track.
> I still had a bit of a struggle, for two reasons:
>
>
> The exports appear to work only if the client hostnames are listed
> i
The Printing Test Day last week was successful in identifying 12 bugs,
across gnome-settings-daemon, control-center, gutenprint, hplip, and
firefox.
Thanks to those who took part.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedora
On 10/10/2011 01:30 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> I find that I now ignore this report since it doesn't indicate the
>> package name. Too many entries to chase down via clicking thru. Not
>> sure of the reason for the change, the old format seems, to me at least,
>> better.
>>
>
> I am, of cours
Compose started at Tue Oct 11 08:16:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:38:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's not so much a question of 'do we have the resources in place to
> probably make sure it works at release time' but 'is it a terrible
> disaster if we make a release in which it's broken'. That's what the
> release validation pr
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13795
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14000
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13499
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13456
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13504
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13999
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
30 matches
Mail list logo
