Hi, Robyn. As discussed on the test list this week and at our meeting,
we'd like to propose the schedule modification described in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-November/104583.html
to the F17 QA schedule. Could you put that in there? Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/2028
Next meeting is 2011-12-05 at 1600 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Please add
any proposed agenda items to the Wiki page at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20111205 . Thanks!
#261: Revise upgrade test case set
-+--
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major|
Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the
suggestions is:
might need improved / more Xen test cases
I wanted to reach out particularly to those who've been involved with
the Xen support and testing, but also the group in general, and see if
this is correct - should
On 29 November 2011 17:40, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the
suggestions is:
might need improved / more Xen test cases
Does this mean various DomU tests or Dom0 tests?
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
The core skill of
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 29 November 2011 17:40, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the
suggestions is:
might need improved / more Xen test cases
Does this mean
The current naming scheme for naming blocker and NTH bugs is irregular - for
example,
F17Alpha
F17Alpha-accepted
F17Beta
F17Beta-accepted
F17Blocker
F17-accepted
The word Blocker is in only one of the three blocker bugs. I also personally
find accepted more confusing than NTH (assuming one
On 29 November 2011 18:51, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The current naming scheme for naming blocker and NTH bugs is irregular - for
example,
F17Alpha
F17Alpha-accepted
F17Beta
F17Beta-accepted
F17Blocker
F17-accepted
The word Blocker is in only one of the three
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15560/nss-3.12.10-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16476/psi-0.14-7.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14753/hardlink-1.0-12.fc15
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14737/hardlink-1.0-12.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14202/xmlrpc3-3.0-6.fc14
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:57 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 29 November 2011 18:51, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The current naming scheme for naming blocker and NTH bugs is irregular - for
example,
F17Alpha
F17Alpha-accepted
F17Beta
F17Beta-accepted
Hi, folks. I wanted to let everyone know that I've gone through all the
issues raised in the Fedora 16 QA Retrospective:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_QA_Retrospective
and taken action on each item where possible.
For most items I've added a recommendation to the Recommendations
#262: Create a release criterion to cover removal of betanag in Final
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
A straightforward release criterion proposal: we should have a criterion
just to specify that the anaconda betanag screen (and any others we put
in) should be removed for final. Right now this is one of those things
that's just obvious but that we ought to write down somewhere. How
about, in the
#262: Create a release criterion to cover removal of betanag in Final
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:51, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
17Alpha
17AlphaNTH
17Beta
17BetaNTH
17Final (or alternatively 17)
17FinalNTH (or alternatively 17NTH)
Why not:
17AlphaBlocker
17AlphaNTH
17BetaBlocker
17BetaNTH
17FinalBlocker
17FinalNTH
... verbosity can be
Hi, folks. I wanted to let everyone know that I've gone through all the
issues raised in the Fedora 16 QA Retrospective:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_QA_Retrospective
and taken action on each item where possible.
For most items I've added a recommendation to the Recommendations
17 matches
Mail list logo