On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 19:40 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:43:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > > For comparison:
> > > >
> > > > 3,2GHz Pentium 4 (HT Disabled) / Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV370 / 1680x10
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 16:00 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
> problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
> tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
> guest additions about the 'e
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
wrote:
>
> Here is the relevant /etc/exports entry in my server:
> / 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0(rw,async)
>
> Here is the screen capture from RC4 64 bit Xfce session:
> [root@omen3 /]# mount 192.168.1.13:/ /o
> mount.nfs: No such device
On 02/23/2012 09:54 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:44 -0500, mwesten wrote:
Fedora-17-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop.iso (RC2) on USB
2.13GHz AthlonXP 2600+ / RV200 (Radeon 7500) / 1280x1024
Fallback mode is fine, but once the shell starts, it's a battle just to
get System Monitor
On 02/23/2012 02:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
For comparison:
3,2GHz Pentium 4 (HT Disabled) / Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV370 / 1680x1050
Fine. System Monitor CPU at 19%.
That's still way higher than I'd like, but it's at least an r300g bug
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:43:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > > For comparison:
> > >
> > > 3,2GHz Pentium 4 (HT Disabled) / Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV370 / 1680x1050
> > >
> > > Fine. System Monitor CPU at 19%.
> >
> > That's still
On 2/23/2012 5:21 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Claude Jones tehogeeservices.com> writes:
Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure I understand it. Are you saying that
I should open a terminal and issue that 'export' command, then run the
installation of guest additions again?
Yes. If you're building
Claude Jones tehogeeservices.com> writes:
> Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure I understand it. Are you saying that
> I should open a terminal and issue that 'export' command, then run the
> installation of guest additions again?
Yes. If you're building Guest Additions in F17 or Rawhide and d
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 16:00 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
> problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
> tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
> guest additions about the 'e
On 2/23/2012 4:12 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Claude Jones tehogeeservices.com> writes:
I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
gu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/2012 04:03 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 08:13 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 02/23/2012 05:31 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) ins
Claude Jones tehogeeservices.com> writes:
> I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
> problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
> tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
> guest additions about the 'experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/2012 08:13 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 05:31 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to
>>> a real partition with F17/
I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
guest additions about the 'experimental x' version. Every aspect of what
I do is slow; boo
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:14 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:40 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > That's what I used to do, but it didn't work for me with F16 and GRUB2.
> > > I get a warning that I shouldn't install GRUB2 to a partitio
Kamil Paral redhat.com> writes:
> Thanks, Andre. Please report it as a bug.
> (and try scp manually whether it works)
I was wrong - it DOES send the file to the remote system. The problem is that if
you don't specify the name of the file on the remote system (which people
wouldn't normally bothe
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:40 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > That's what I used to do, but it didn't work for me with F16 and GRUB2.
> > I get a warning that I shouldn't install GRUB2 to a partition and then
> > an error about there not being enough space.
>
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:40 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Michael Schwendt said:
> > Is it a single /boot partition shared by multiple dists?
> > If so, that has always been just an ugly work-around to escape from having
> > to repartition. I prefer individual partitions for each d
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > For comparison:
> >
> > 3,2GHz Pentium 4 (HT Disabled) / Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV370 / 1680x1050
> >
> > Fine. System Monitor CPU at 19%.
>
> That's still way higher than I'd like, but it's at least an r300g bug
> not an llvmpipe bug.
Re
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 01:55 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Here is the relevant /etc/exports entry in my server:
> / 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0(rw,async)
>
> Here is the screen capture from RC4 64 bit Xfce session:
> [root@omen3 /]# mount 192.168.1.13:/ /o
> mount.nfs: No such device
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/2012 05:31 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to a
>> real partition with F17/Alpha/RC4: No problems during install,
>> the system
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.2. No new features were added after alpha 8, just
many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw
packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is inc
.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/commit/?id=ebca1ce1287679c5cb470804abfcc8de3c2d740c
Hoorayfixed in rawhide 20120223. Thanks!
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hello gang,
as there were no opposing voices, I'll add the test to the test matrix template.
Once again, kudos to adamw for providing the base test.
Joza
- Original Message -
> From: "Josef Skladanka"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Friday, Febru
USB-stick is persistent
Transcript of a successful install:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/tools_livecd-iso-to-disk
Tom Gilliard
satellit_ on #sugar IRC freenode
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Once upon a time, Michael Schwendt said:
> Is it a single /boot partition shared by multiple dists?
> If so, that has always been just an ugly work-around to escape from having
> to repartition. I prefer individual partitions for each dist plus
> installing each dist's boot loader in the partition
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:44 -0500, mwesten wrote:
> Fedora-17-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop.iso (RC2) on USB
>
> 2.13GHz AthlonXP 2600+ / RV200 (Radeon 7500) / 1280x1024
>
> Fallback mode is fine, but once the shell starts, it's a battle just to
> get System Monitor open and to the Resources tab. On
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:21 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Did somebody try to run acroread in F17? I did it and got as result:
>
> acroread
>
> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading
> shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot enable executable stack as
> share
On 02/22/2012 02:42 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
I am afraid that I am not qualified to sensibly discuss underlying
mechanisms. I can only report what I see. In this thread
mwes...@verizon.net wrote "the processor gets pegged at 100%
continuously and it's not usable". I am not sure what was t
On 02/23/2012 12:42 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to a real
>> partition with F17/Alpha/RC4: No problems during install, the system
>> runs immediately. Applying all available updates.
On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to a real
partition with F17/Alpha/RC4: No problems during install, the system
runs immediately. Applying all available updates.
But there are some flaws:
1. No sound with "00:1b.0 Audi
Compose started at Thu Feb 23 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
On 02/23/2012 08:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a fresh F17 desktop (gnome3) installation on my box to a real
> partition with F17/Alpha/RC4: No problems during install, the system
> runs immediately. Applying all available updates.
>
> But there are some flaws:
>
>
> 3. One ugly
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:38:16 -0500, TD (Timothy) wrote:
> It's not the recovery mode entry that bothers me, but the fact that for
> all of the kernels in my boot parttion gets assigned to F17 or what
> every the last distro installed. Maybe the mkconfig program isn't samrt
> enought or maybe I sho
Here is the relevant /etc/exports entry in my server:
/ 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0(rw,async)
Here is the screen capture from RC4 64 bit Xfce session:
[root@omen3 /]# mount 192.168.1.13:/ /o
mount.nfs: No such device
[root@omen3 /]#
FWIW the /etc/exports has not been changed since November,
and t
> Kamil Paral redhat.com> writes:
>
> > > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla (Alpha)
> > > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk (Alpha)
> > > QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode
> >
> > I have tried Alpha RC4 (a
On 02/23/2012 09:45 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
>> Did somebody try to run acroread in F17? I did it and got as result:
>>
>> acroread
>>
>> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading
>> shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> Did somebody try to run acroread in F17? I did it and got as result:
>
> acroread
>
> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading
> shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot enable executable stack as
> shared o
Did somebody try to run acroread in F17? I did it and got as result:
acroread
/opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading
shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot enable executable stack as
shared object requires: Permission denied
Anybody can confirm this?
Kind r
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
>
> It's not the recovery mode entry that bothers me, but the fact that for
> all of the kernels in my boot parttion gets assigned to F17 or what
> every the last distro installed. Maybe the mkconfig program isn't samrt
> enought or maybe I sh
40 matches
Mail list logo
