Re: F17 breaks things

2012-03-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:01:04 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Linrad configure fails with: > gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wl' -Wl is an invalid option. In the past gcc ignored these; now it's an error. (-Wl needs an argument to be valid.) -- test mailing list

F17 breaks things

2012-03-14 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
Linrad configure fails with: gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wl' --- The gcc compiler is installed and works, but the linker does not work. a symbolic limk may help: ln /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /lib/libgcc_s.so (that does not help) Gnur

Fedora 15 updates-testing report

2012-03-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3414/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3355/rubygem-actionpack-3.0.5-6.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2

Draft SOP for requesting TCs/RCs

2012-03-14 Thread Andre Robatino
Eric Blake redhat.com> writes: > What about requiring the number to be strictly increasing: > > TC1 < RC2 < RC3 < TC4 < RC5 > > where the prefix denotes how stable we think this particular build is (T > vs. R depending on whether there are known blockers). Since you don't > reuse the suffix, i

Re: Draft SOP for requesting TCs/RCs

2012-03-14 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/14/2012 07:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> TC and RC naming is confusing already. RC > TC, but not >> alphabetically. Having e.g. TC1 < RC1 < RC2 < TC2 < RC3 is a complete >> mess, arcane knowledge that only QA team would have. Since we >> generally ask also other parties to perform testi

Re: Draft SOP for requesting TCs/RCs

2012-03-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 06:04 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > One remark to this paragraph: > > > It is theoretically possible that the situation could arise where > > a release candidate is requested and built, and results in multiple > > blockers being reported and accepted, some of which are easy to

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:45 +1030, Glen Turner wrote: > Hi, > > I am the network engineer at Australia's Academic and Research Network > responsible for assisting the deployment of IPv6 across Australian > universities. Your posting was bought to my attention. > > Your phrasing of the condition f

Re: ipw2200 bg doesn't work in f17

2012-03-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:29 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > If certain wifi cards (using certain kernel module) don't work in F17, > should I propose that as a blocker? I'm not sure about that. Other > wifi cards work. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802106 Propose it, yeah. It will t

Re: New BugZapper Introduction

2012-03-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Ted Hornsby wrote: My name is Ted Hornsby. I'm 27 and reside in the North Texas area. I've been using Linux for quite a while, but have only just recently started using Fedora, but I'm liking it more and more everyday. I wanted to give something back to the community, so I thought joining the B

New BugZapper Introduction

2012-03-14 Thread Ted Hornsby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, My name is Ted Hornsby. I'm 27 and reside in the North Texas area. I've been using Linux for quite a while, but have only just recently started using Fedora, but I'm liking it more and more everyday. I wanted to give something back

ipw2200 bg doesn't work in f17

2012-03-14 Thread Kamil Paral
If certain wifi cards (using certain kernel module) don't work in F17, should I propose that as a blocker? I'm not sure about that. Other wifi cards work. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802106 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: F17 gnome desktop broken after updating gnome-shell, mutter, clutter

2012-03-14 Thread pringle...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Joachim Backes < joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote: > On 03/14/2012 09:14 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > > Sorry, I meant F17 and not F14. Typo! > > > Hi, > > > > the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17, > > mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-

Re: F17 gnome desktop broken after updating gnome-shell, mutter, clutter

2012-03-14 Thread Joachim Backes
On 03/14/2012 09:14 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Sorry, I meant F17 and not F14. Typo! > Hi, > > the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17, > mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-2.fc17 breag the > gnome-desktop: no more top bar, no window manager funtionality. > > I could get ri

F14 gnome desktop broken after updating gnome-shell, mutter, clutter

2012-03-14 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17, mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-2.fc17 breag the gnome-desktop: no more top bar, no window manager funtionality. I could get rid from this by downgrading these three packages. Xfce still operates flawlessly :-) Anybody sees t

Re: Installation interfaces criterion proposal

2012-03-14 Thread Petr Schindler
On Út, 2012-03-13 at 22:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Ack! Since we had a solid consensus on the meeting I think we should > just go ahead and put this in the Beta criteria. The new criterion is right on the place. So from now, non-functional serial console interface is beta (and final) b