On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:01:04 -0700,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Linrad configure fails with:
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wl'
-Wl is an invalid option. In the past gcc ignored these; now it's an error.
(-Wl needs an argument to be valid.)
--
test mailing list
Linrad configure fails with:
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wl'
---
The gcc compiler is installed and works, but the linker does not work.
a symbolic limk may help:
ln /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /lib/libgcc_s.so
(that does not help)
Gnur
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3414/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.8-9.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3355/rubygem-actionpack-3.0.5-6.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
Eric Blake redhat.com> writes:
> What about requiring the number to be strictly increasing:
>
> TC1 < RC2 < RC3 < TC4 < RC5
>
> where the prefix denotes how stable we think this particular build is (T
> vs. R depending on whether there are known blockers). Since you don't
> reuse the suffix, i
On 03/14/2012 07:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> TC and RC naming is confusing already. RC > TC, but not
>> alphabetically. Having e.g. TC1 < RC1 < RC2 < TC2 < RC3 is a complete
>> mess, arcane knowledge that only QA team would have. Since we
>> generally ask also other parties to perform testi
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 06:04 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> One remark to this paragraph:
>
> > It is theoretically possible that the situation could arise where
> > a release candidate is requested and built, and results in multiple
> > blockers being reported and accepted, some of which are easy to
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:45 +1030, Glen Turner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the network engineer at Australia's Academic and Research Network
> responsible for assisting the deployment of IPv6 across Australian
> universities. Your posting was bought to my attention.
>
> Your phrasing of the condition f
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:29 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> If certain wifi cards (using certain kernel module) don't work in F17,
> should I propose that as a blocker? I'm not sure about that. Other
> wifi cards work.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802106
Propose it, yeah. It will t
Ted Hornsby wrote:
My name is Ted Hornsby. I'm 27 and reside in the North Texas area.
I've been using Linux for quite a while, but have only just recently
started using Fedora, but I'm liking it more and more everyday. I
wanted to give something back to the community, so I thought joining the
B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
My name is Ted Hornsby. I'm 27 and reside in the North Texas area.
I've been using Linux for quite a while, but have only just recently
started using Fedora, but I'm liking it more and more everyday. I
wanted to give something back
If certain wifi cards (using certain kernel module) don't work in F17, should I
propose that as a blocker? I'm not sure about that. Other wifi cards work.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802106
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Joachim Backes <
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 09:14 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant F17 and not F14. Typo!
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17,
> > mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-
On 03/14/2012 09:14 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Sorry, I meant F17 and not F14. Typo!
> Hi,
>
> the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17,
> mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-2.fc17 breag the
> gnome-desktop: no more top bar, no window manager funtionality.
>
> I could get ri
Hi,
the most recent F17 updates to clutter-1.9.14-1.fc17,
mutter-3.3.90-2.fc17 and gnome-shell-3.3.90-2.fc17 breag the
gnome-desktop: no more top bar, no window manager funtionality.
I could get rid from this by downgrading these three packages.
Xfce still operates flawlessly :-)
Anybody sees t
On Út, 2012-03-13 at 22:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Ack! Since we had a solid consensus on the meeting I think we should
> just go ahead and put this in the Beta criteria.
The new criterion is right on the place. So from now, non-functional
serial console interface is beta (and final) b
15 matches
Mail list logo