Hi folks,
Could someone please install the new trash-cli in rawhide and see if it
works as expected please? Upstream's made a lot of changes, and I'd like
to know it works before I build for f17 etc. I don't have a rawhide
machine handy at the moment :/
It's just a command line client to Trash. W
Hello Keith,
You should be sponsored in the triage group as of this writing and have the
bugzilla permissions to get started.
You may want to look in to the 'proventesters' group as well. Here is a
link for further information.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester
You may have already st
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5163 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing instructi
On 04/28/2012 12:15 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> My system is up-to-date with updates-testing.
>
> Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of firefox
> 12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox, but
> it runs in konqueror, but only this site appears to be
> affected:
>
> htt
My system is up-to-date with updates-testing.
Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of firefox
12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox, but
it runs in konqueror, but only this site appears to be
affected:
http://www.cbc.ca/thenational/watch/
Youtube works.
--
test
On 04/28/2012 02:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:21 +0200, sixpack13 wrote:
...
Alternatively: if you pick 'custom partition layout', then make sure you
_actually check_ the layout before proceeding.
Did that !
As I ever do since redhat 6.x !
Please take a look at th
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, george2 wrote:
The banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing
something wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to
act.
If you really meant the words you typed then you would be responding to
the replies to your message.
It is obv
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 01:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a hot dog. It has always been a hot dog. The name is not an
> innuendo, it is not a double entendre. If anyone thinks it is, that's
> their problem, not ours. The whole beefy miracle thing is and _has
> always been_ about a food produ
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having another problem installing Oracle 11gR2 on F17. I'm getting:
>
This is a known bug in Oracle's installer, and apparently they don't
care since they don't support Fedora.
There is a workaround described here:
https://forum
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 15:55, george2 wrote:
> But also note that few women are involved in the approval processes. The
> banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing something
> wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to act.
From Bonsai and Origami to Human
I do not have LibreOffice installed on my system, I have Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 RC1.
However, launching the system updater notifies me that there is an
update available for URE-Runtime (a component of LibreOffice) and
proceeds to
install such update.
If this breaks Apache OpenOffice 3.4 who's to b
Dear folks,
I have an acer aspire one netbook with atheros wireless:
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x / AR542x
Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
After kernel 3.3.1(3.3.1-5.fc17.i686), the wireless does not connect
automatically anymore :(,
I have t
2012/4/27 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 04/26/2012 07:46 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>>
>> INFO: /usr/bin/ld: warning: -z lazyload ignored.
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: -z nolazyload ignored.
>> /usr/bin/ld:
>> /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/sysman/lib//libnmectl.a(nmectlt.o):
>> undefined reference to
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:21 +0200, sixpack13 wrote:
> hallo
>
> according to this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817037
>
>
> I need your help !!!
>
>
>
> As you can read in my bug report:
>
> "...
> I ddrescued the disc and with foremost I scratched 116.000 files from it...
On 04/27/2012 07:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's in Proposed Blockers, where it should be.
Sorry, shouldn't have scanned, should have studied. Thanks.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tes
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:55 -0400, george2 wrote:
>if one headmaster says the release is inappropriate to use in the
> teaching or desktop situation;
>
>if one religious leader objects to its use in that the supporting
> material for the name says "this is your new god"
>
>if one adv
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:44 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 04/27/2012 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:07 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >>
> Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idm
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6273/openstack-nova-2012.1-2.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6282/bugzilla-4.0.6-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5599/phpMyA
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 13:56 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > # F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
> > # Date: 2012-05-02
> > # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
> > # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
> >
> > The second F17
On 04/26/2012 07:46 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
INFO: /usr/bin/ld: warning: -z lazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld: warning: -z nolazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld:
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/sysman/lib//libnmectl.a(nmectlt.o):
undefined reference to symbol 'B_DestroyKeyObject'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'B_De
On 04/27/2012 06:55 PM, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors
to Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
First and foremost the release name does not have any
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6371/nginx-1.0.15-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6395/openssl-1.0.0i
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6365/openstack-nova-2011.3.1-8.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6368/bugzilla-4.0.6-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5624/phpM
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:23:46 +0100,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks! Can people please provide karma for these builds if
possible:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6800/livecd-tools-17.10-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6815/anaconda-17.23-1
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 16:07, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Lets not delay the release.
+1
who cares about the name?
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 27/04/12 19:55, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors to
Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
Lets not delay the release.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of a
I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name
is changed in the released code.
I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this
name may do considerable harm.
There is not formal criterion for a blocker bug. So I appeal to this
group, as the last in
On 04/27/2012 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at 17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2012 12:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> selinux-policy needs a newer checkpolicy
>>> Thank you.
>> I believe the checkpolicy and libsepol have made their way out of
>> testing,
hallo
according to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817037
I need your help !!!
As you can read in my bug report:
"...
I ddrescued the disc and with foremost I scratched 116.000 files from it...
a "cat /dev/sdb | grep " shows some/most of the files with
complete pathes a
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers, as most regular
at
Hey, folks! Can people please provide karma for these builds if
possible:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6800/livecd-tools-17.10-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6815/anaconda-17.23-1.fc17
(you can 'yum localinstall' anaconda into a live image, then
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
> >> executed inside of a mock-environ
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >>> selinux-policy needs a newer checkpolicy
> > Thank you.
> I believe the checkpolicy and libsepol have made their way out of testing, so
> they should show up soon.
Dan, in future, please bundle interdependent packages like this into a
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:07 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> > > Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idmap?
> > With F17 we moved to the keyring based ID mapping, which eliminates
> > the need for the rpc.idmapd daemon to
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idmap?
> With F17 we moved to the keyring based ID mapping, which eliminates
> the need for the rpc.idmapd daemon to be started on the client side.
>
> Here is how it works...
>
> Wi
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:14 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> # F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
> # Date: 2012-04-27
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at
> 17:00 UT
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:14 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> # F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
> # Date: 2012-04-27
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
>
> The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at
> 17:00 UT
On 04/27/2012 04:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 10:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Now, I can't get the failure to reproduce at all!
>
> Well, it gets a bit weirder
And still a bit weirder: The problem depends on the runlevel: Booting
into runlevel 3 (no graphics) lets my system then re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:52:14 -0400
From: Steve Dickson
To: Dennis Gilmore
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:51:49 -0400
From: Steve Dickson
To: Dennis Gilmore
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:51:34 -0400
From: Steve Dickson
To: Dennis Gilmore
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 201
On 04/27/2012 10:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Now, I can't get the failure to reproduce at all!
Well, it gets a bit weirder
If I shutdown from the login screen I get the 2 minute delay.
If I shutdown from within KDE it doesn't "delay" but dies on a kernel panic...
Last
few lines are...
Cann
On 04/27/2012 09:45 PM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
>> after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
>> hangs up.
> Is it just me or disabling wireless/unplugging the network cable seems to
> work ?
>
OK Now
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be
> >> easily
> >> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
> >
> > Not to mention
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
> hangs up.
Is it just me or disabling wireless/unplugging the network cable seems to work ?
--
Pedro
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>>
>> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
>> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
>
> Not to mention that running extensive
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
> executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
Not to mention that running extensive test suites for every build will
put strain on our build infras
Compose started at Fri Apr 27 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On 04/27/2012 02:11 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
I wonder how different a run-time test-suite dffers from a test suite to
be executed during build.
There are 2 major differences:
1. The package-to-test itself is not installed to its final destination.
2. A testsuite being run in %check has acce
On 27/04/12 13:57, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A wrong approach?
>
> Why do you insist on using the %check section for that? It's a build-time
> feature, found only in the spec file and not packaged in the built rpms
> (also due to the test data I've referred to above).
>
I'm asking if the scripts
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:04:56 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
> On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
> > buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
> > won't be available.
> >
> We encourag
On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
> buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
> won't be available.
>
We encourage our packagers to implement useful check-sections.
To make an example,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:10:11 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just a half-baked idea, I'm carrying some time with me around.
>
> Some packages have a check-section being executed during build. Would it
> make sense to execute that test, when required packages of that package
> get updated (
Hi,
just a half-baked idea, I'm carrying some time with me around.
Some packages have a check-section being executed during build. Would it
make sense to execute that test, when required packages of that package
get updated (to see, if the update breaks my package)?
(Or other way around: when su
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:22:40AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17),
> rebooting hangs up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
>
> I had to downgrade systemd to get rid from this bug.
>
> No such problems with the previous versi
On 04/25/2012 11:55 AM, Michal Nowak wrote:
Friends of ABRT, Quality Engineers, fellow testers -
There's a Test Day going on tomorrow, Thursday 2012-Apr-26:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-26_ABRT_and_deduplication_service
Looking at ABRT v2.0.10 (and related components) in Fe
On 04/27/2012 09:45 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
> The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
>
Sorry, but I'm speaking about F17, not F16. Additionally, I'm not using
NFS or CIFS.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://w
On 04/27/2012 03:45 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
> The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
Your issue is not related. The systems I'm testing are F17 with no NFS or CIFS
shares and downgrading as suggested by Joachim
Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
On 04/27/2012 12:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Dear all,
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17),
rebooting hangs up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
I had
On 04/26/2012 05:14 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> $ sudo reboot
> or
> $ sudo shutdown -P now
>
> takes ~1/2 mins to shutdown; using "Restart" or "Shutdown" in GDM/Gnome
> session
> menu takes ~10 seconds.
>
> Any ideas why?
>
> F17, x86.
> --
> Pedro
>
>
You are probably seeing https://bugzilla.
On 04/27/2012 03:22 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
> hangs
> up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
>
> I had to downgrade systemd to get rid from this bug.
>
> No such problems with the previous version.
>
2012/4/26 Pedro Francisco
> $ sudo reboot
> or
> $ sudo shutdown -P now
>
> takes ~1/2 mins to shutdown; using "Restart" or "Shutdown" in GDM/Gnome
> session menu takes ~10 seconds.
>
> Any ideas why?
>
> F17, x86.
> --
> Pedro
>
> same here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Dear all,
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17),
rebooting hangs up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
I had to downgrade systemd to get rid from this bug.
No such problems with the previous version.
Anybody sees this too?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http:
65 matches
Mail list logo
