On 22/04/12 03:06, Tom Horsley wrote:
I see in f17 that firewalld is the default and iptables and
ip6tables are not enabled by default.
firewalld on hold till F18, just the feature page not updated.
Check last FESco minutes.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/838
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack
Hi,
my LAN interface was named *em1* since starting with F17. But this week
I saw it's name has been changed to *em15*. Who could be the culprit?
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01)
All comments are welcome.
On 05/05/2012 10:09 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
my LAN interface was named *em1* since starting with F17. But this week
I saw it's name has been changed to *em15*. Who could be the culprit?
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit
I've just tried installing F17 TC3 from both the DVD media and Live CD. In both
cases the install ended up with the message There was an error writing the
MBR. The system may not be bootable. Indeed that is the case.
Is anyone else seeing this?
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself,
On Sat, 05 May 2012 11:48:54 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
It seems the update of biosdevname to biosdevname-0.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64
was the culprit. After downgrading to biosdevname-0.3.11-6, the LAN
device was renamed to em1.
It sure is nice that the immutable constant name generator
seems to
On 05/05/2012 12:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've just tried installing F17 TC3 from both the DVD media and Live CD. In
both
cases the install ended up with the message There was an error writing
the
MBR. The system may not be bootable. Indeed that is the case.
Is anyone else seeing
On 05/05/2012 02:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 05 May 2012 11:48:54 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
It seems the update of biosdevname to biosdevname-0.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64
was the culprit. After downgrading to biosdevname-0.3.11-6, the LAN
device was renamed to em1.
It sure is nice that
Compose started at Sat May 5 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
The error happens on any 32-bit TC3 install and never on 64-bit. It happens on
both VirtualBox and KVM guests.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819151
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#294: Want to become proventester - michalb
-+--
Reporter: bienm| Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component:
I want to get speakup working on the Fedora 17 beta installation I'm
running. IIRC, speakup is now packaged with the mainline linux kernel.
However, it doesn't seem to be present -- running modprobe
speakup_soft fails, nothing shows up with 'locate speakup', and it
isn't in /lib/modules. Any help
On 05-05-12 17:46, Hussain Kadhem wrote:
I want to get speakup working on the Fedora 17 beta installation I'm
running. IIRC, speakup is now packaged with the mainline linux kernel.
However, it doesn't seem to be present -- running modprobe
speakup_soft fails, nothing shows up with 'locate
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5785/python3-3.2.3-5.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6334/sectool-0.9.5-7.fc17
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Hussain Kadhem hussain...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to get speakup working on the Fedora 17 beta installation I'm
running. IIRC, speakup is now packaged with the mainline linux kernel.
However, it doesn't seem to be present -- running modprobe
speakup_soft fails,
I made a fresh install from DVD of a F17, then I upgraded it by
Internet, then I decided to install Thunderbird, but I don't have the
icon for Thunderbird, and I get the generic icon. Any idea??
Antonio M
Fedora Ambassadors
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
how do I disable/stop the firewall in a F-17 fresh installation???
Tnx
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F16 (Verne) on Acer 5720
http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
http://www.campingmonterosa.com
http://www.studiodacolpaloschi.it
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Which format is also better *.gz or *.1 ???
--
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
--
test mailing list
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7124/postgresql-pgpoolAdmin-3.1.1-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5833/python3-3.2.3-1.fc16
Don't have nspluginwrapper installed. Do have Adobe flash-plugin RPM
(64-bit) installed.
Recent update went from totem-mozplugin-3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64 to
totem-mozplugin-3.4.1-2.fc17.x86_64. After this, attempted to visit
http://www.notdoppler.com/arachnophilia.php , and the browser tried
On 05/06/2012 02:52 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Each man page should accompany the program it documents.
i.e. if a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rob,
On 05/06/2012 07:52 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place
project manual files in: 1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz,
or 2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Which format
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 17:52 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Which format is also better *.gz or *.1 ???
If you are
OK, so I could be remembering wrong, but I could have sworn that at
some point in the past gnome-terminal was able to display file names
with utf-8 characters in them.
Now, however, when I have a file on my desktop whose name looks like
this:
It
Two additional things about this I've discovered...
1. Changing the encoding of the terminal to utf-8 in the Terminal |
Set Character Encoding menu doesn't help. It changes the garbage
that is displayed, but it's still garbage.
2. If I do "echo *.mp3" instead
On 05/06/2012 11:53 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Two additional things about this I've discovered...
1. Changing the encoding of the terminal to utf-8 in the Terminal | Set
Character
Encoding menu doesn't help. It changes the garbage that is displayed, but it's
still garbage.
2. If I do
On 05/05/2012 11:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
For those of us not able to input Hebrew Could you type in a sample?
Here's an example file name:
09 ביילע.mp3
Having said that, it could get corrupted by email just as easily as by
ls, so I've attached a 7z file with a similar file name
On 05/06/2012 12:07 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 05/05/2012 11:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
For those of us not able to input Hebrew Could you type in a sample?
Here's an example file name:
09 ביילע.mp3
Having said that, it could get corrupted by email just as easily as by ls, so
I've
well i tried it
when i make the file with touch 09 ביילע it shows the same thing when
i do ls | grep 09
ביילע
well this really odd but i wuld like to test it again if you gt
another file in Hebrew
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 05/06/2012 12:07
On 05/06/2012 12:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wellthis may be odd.
As I think you can see, the file name displays correctly in the email.
If I touch 09 ביילע.mp3 I get a correct file name...
If I 7za x utf8.7z I get this 09 ×?×?×?×?×¢.txt
FWIW I created a file called 台北市松山.txt
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5785/python3-3.2.3-5.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6334/sectool-0.9.5-7.fc17
On 05/06/2012 12:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/06/2012 12:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wellthis may be odd.
As I think you can see, the file name displays correctly in the email.
If I touch 09 ביילע.mp3 I get a correct file name...
If I 7za x utf8.7z I get this 09 ×?×?×?×?×¢.txt
Hi,
On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:59:00 -0400
Jonathan Kamens j...@kamens.us wrote:
Not sure totem-mozplugin should be claiming ownership of file types
it's not actually fully capable of playing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804435
Not sure why I just saw the problem now with the
Joseph L. Casale ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on
06/05/2012 01:23:
how do I disable/stop the firewall in a F-17 fresh installation???
Well, since new service is not available yet, use the old one...
systemctl stop iptables.service
I have 3 different F17, but only 1 fresh
On 05/06/2012 01:46 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
I have 3 different F17, but only 1 fresh installation: I have installed
system-config 1.2.29-7.FC17 on all machines, but when I start it on the fresh
F-17
I get an error stating:
ERROR:FirewallD is active, please use firewall-config
What
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
P.S.: I think, this mail is off-topic for this list.
Thanks to it I learned about man page placement and formats. I think it
could be considered on-topic as the OP was asking what manpage format is
currently the norm
35 matches
Mail list logo
