Executing poweroff in F-17 (x86_64 up to date) defaults to the "Authentication
is required for powering off the system while other users are logged in"
snippet.
Only one user (user1) actually logged in, however results from "who" and
"users" show otherwise:
# who
user1 :0 2012-07-23 13:04 (
We need to pay special attention to the half implementation of the
preset feature [1] that Red Hat club that FESCO is, decided should take
place.
The feature it self is much needed and appreciated however not making
the switch in a single release cycle after all the legacy sysv script
have be
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10934/dropbear-0.55-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10314/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10871/perl-DBD
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10892/perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.2-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10893/nsd-
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:50 -0400, Scott Poore wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm Scott Poore. I'm new to Fedora QA but, I'm a long time Fedora
> > and RHEL user and admin on both a personal and professional level.
> > I
> > use Beaker today for writing and running auto
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:05:48 -0700
"Brian C. Lane" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:55:09 -0700
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 20:47 +0800, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> > > > Sorry, it's not Rawhide ISOs, but ni
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:55:09 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 20:47 +0800, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> > > Sorry, it's not Rawhide ISOs, but nightly builds ISOs. They all
> > > failed as I see it in this website:
>
I'm testing SNA on an Intel Graphics card:
$ sudo rpm -qa xorg-x11-drv-intel*
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.20.1-1.fc17.i686
$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf
Section "Device"
Identifier "Intel Graphics"
Driver "intel"
Option "AccelMethod" "sna"
EndSection
$ glxinfo |grep "
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:50 -0400, Scott Poore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Scott Poore. I'm new to Fedora QA but, I'm a long time Fedora
> and RHEL user and admin on both a personal and professional level. I
> use Beaker today for writing and running automated tests.
>
> I work with IPA today and
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> drwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /usr/bin
>> drwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 /usr/
>> drwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 /usr/share
>> dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 08:05 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 23:45:21 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >It seems like there's been a general lack of Major Topics in QA-land
> >lately; activating Paranoid Mode, does anyone think there are any
> >negative reasons for t
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 23:45:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
It seems like there's been a general lack of Major Topics in QA-land
lately; activating Paranoid Mode, does anyone think there are any
negative reasons for this, or is it more just that things are sort of
ticking along smoothly an
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:50:59 +0530, A. Mani wrote:
> > Did the user run ktorrent as "root"?
>
> No
As a quick thought, then it would need another vulnerability outside
ktorrent to elevate user privileges. Plus the corresponding exploit.
> encryption, scripts were enabled in ktorrent.
>
> > Als
13 matches
Mail list logo
