Dne Čt 26. července 2012 21:36:20, Adam Pribyl napsal(a):
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, ergodic wrote:
Karel your philosophy is correct. I have seen this issue
when my grandchildren complained that they could not turn of
their box after it was was upgraded to F-17. That is why I
filed Bug
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote:
but the warning should not prevent _any_ eligible user from
powering off/rebooting, it should just provide a possibility to
reconsider
+1
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10934/dropbear-0.55-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10314/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc16
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11182/xen-4.1.2-24.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:09:03 +0200,
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote:
if the user is local then DO NOT ask for admin privileges (else
the user will just cut the power supply which is worse than
killing others' running processes)
I'd prefer to keep that option. A local user would be
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the same system at the same time? What
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
detect and mount an existing default installation'
Reason (according to Chris): There's been no
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial
console interface'
Reason (according to Chris): (This criterion) will need to be removed for
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
(read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, hardware, and
software) installations'
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler pschi...@redhat.com said:
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
(read-write and read-only) LVM,
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using any
network-attached storage devices (e.g. iSCSI, FCoE, Fibre Channel)'
Reason (according to Chris):
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler pschi...@redhat.com said:
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using any
network-attached storage devices
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
It is a big problem. Lot of things will be broken (won't be in new
anaconda for F18, but should be again in next releases, hopefully). For
example, we use serial console a lot and for f18 it won't work. I'm here
only proposing changes because of the state of anaconda and I hope that
the discussion
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler pschi...@redhat.com said:
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
'The rescue mode of the installer must be able
Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be moved to?
That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are maintained, yet
rational is provided for why they are not worked in this release.
Just a thought.
-Joe
From: Petr
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is a big problem. Lot of things will be broken (won't be in new
anaconda for F18, but should be again in next releases,
hopefully). ...
... and I hope that
the discussion within this threads will lead to some action - for me it
would be better to
On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the
It is clear that different scenarios require different rules.
I have installed Fedora for three different friends. All at different physical
locations from my place. These people have no computer knowledge, so giving
them elevated permissions spells disaster. However they must to be able to
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.**gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from
On 27/07/12 17:34, Tom London wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
Same error on koji kernel-build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4336751
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6751/4336751/root.log
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of
On 07/27/2012 10:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
will have to make their best to bring rescue mod. We can also change
this criterion. It's on discussion. Note
- Original Message -
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
serial console interface'
Reason (according to Chris): (This
On 07/27/2012 11:11 AM, Scott Poore wrote:
- Original Message -
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
serial console interface'
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Generic rescue images would still work for most problems but I'd tend
to agree: a final release with a non-working rescue mode is pretty
uncool and seems like a bad precedent.
In any case if the plan is to extend installer initrd with the rescue
- Original Message -
From: Robyn Bergeron rberg...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:15:27 PM
Subject: Re: [criteria update] Serial console
I think most of these questions got
answered at the FESCo meeting where the feature was approved.
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
will have to make their best to bring
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 07:19 -0700, Joe Wulf wrote:
Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be
moved to?
That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are
maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in
this release.
Just a thought.
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:38 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
detect and mount an existing
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:26 -0400, Scott Poore wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Robyn Bergeron rberg...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:15:27 PM
Subject: Re: [criteria update] Serial console
I think most of these questions got
On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:51 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
On 07/27/2012 09:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, to a certain extent it's academic. I suspect that if QA was
strongly of the opinion that the feature isn't sufficiently complete,
FESCo would give substantial weight to that input in making its
determination. But it's FESCo that owns the
On Friday, July 27, 2012, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Please file a bug against both these packages. File conflicts
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 15:42:03 -0700,
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, July 27, 2012, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Scott Poore spo...@redhat.com wrote:
No text mode installs at all? That seems like a pretty critical function to
me.
exactly, many ARM releases depend on interactive install using a rs232
connection as terminal.
FC
--
test mailing list
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:26 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Scott Poore spo...@redhat.com wrote:
No text mode installs at all? That seems like a pretty critical function
to me.
exactly, many ARM releases depend on interactive install using a rs232
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11207/nsd-3.2.13-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10934/dropbear-0.55-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11190/xen-4.1.2-9.fc16
43 matches
Mail list logo
