On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
as long as it's broadly working and you don't see any major
regressions
vs. previous builds, go ahead and give karma. we really need to get
some
builds pushed stable at this point.
Karma given :)
Thanks,
Ankur
signature.asc
#314: Bug summaries are not updated
---+
Reporter: kparal| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Blocker bug
Is there a single place for reporting translation issues in Fedora 18 or
should I contact each project separately?
Is it possible to release (through update channel) new package version
in Fedora just because of changes in translated messages?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:22 PM, kevin martin ktm...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. I've
also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this same time.
Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I can run X again?
Does
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:22 -0500, kevin martin wrote:
Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below.
I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this
same time. Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I
can run X again?
The only reason I
#314: Bug summaries are not updated
---+--
Reporter: kparal| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Blocker
#314: Bug summaries are not updated
---+--
Reporter: kparal| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Blocker
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:22 -0500, kevin martin wrote:
Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below.
I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this
same time. Anybody with any
ਬੁੱਧਵਾਰ 05 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2012 03:48 ਸ਼ਾਮ ਨੂੰ, Mateusz Marzantowicz ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
Is there a single place for reporting translation issues in Fedora 18 or
should I contact each project separately?
1) if there are many issues specific to a language, it can be reported
to:
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.13 for Testing. This release fixes a bug found
during upgrade with the POSIX Windows Sync plugin.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.13
NOTE: 1.2.11 will not be available for Fedora 16 or
==
#fedora-bugzappers: f18-alpha-blocker-review-6
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-09-05/f18-alpha-blocker-review-6.2012-09-05-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
I downloaded and installed the PRE-6 DVD several times
on my test machine.
I even changed the graphics card from ATI to Nvidia 9600GT.
The installs proceeded normally but the resulting install
would not start X.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of
Hey, folks. We're currently sitting on quite a long list of F18 Alpha
blocker/NTH fixes that don't have sufficient karma to be pushed stable.
If people could please test these and provide karma, it'd really help:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.8.2-6.fc18
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 17:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
If you could do a DVD
install of TC5 or pre-TC6, that's enough to karma yum.
Hi Adam,
What if I did a netinst? I used yum on the working system after that. It
seemed to work. Karma+ for that?
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur
On 2012-09-05 18:25, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 17:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
If you could do a DVD
install of TC5 or pre-TC6, that's enough to karma yum.
Hi Adam,
What if I did a netinst? I used yum on the working system after that.
It
seemed to work. Karma+ for that?
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 18:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
the specific issue the update is supposed to fix relates specifically
to DVD install, but we're pretty sure that fix is good, so smoke
testing
is probably okay for karma, yeah.
Hi Adam,
Great. Karma given for dracut and firstboot.
16 matches
Mail list logo
