The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14363/phpldapadmin-1.2.2-3.gitbbedf1.fc16
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14295/moodle-2.1.8-1.fc16
10
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 22:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
> > > > There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug).
> > >
> > > This *is* a bug IMO. We should have reasonable defaults and allow t
The Retrospective page for Fedora 18 QA is now up:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_QA_Retrospective
We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things
that didn't go so well during the Fedora 18 validation process, and for
tracking ideas we have but don't have time t
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 04:25 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > 'The installer must be able to install each of the release blocking
> > > desktops, as well as the minimal package set, for each supported
> > > installation method (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
> > >
> > > Comments please.
> >
> > I'm
#305: Abrt test day request for 2012-09-27
---+-
Reporter: dkutalek | Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:|
#303: Proposed Test Day - Virtualization
---+---
Reporter: crobinso | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 18
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked B
On Sep 17, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Doubt it, we dropped the GPT experiment. 18, like 17, uses MS-DOS labels
> in most cases, it'll only use GPT for EFI installs or disks of 3TB+ (or
> whatever the line is, I forget - really freaking huge disks.)
2.2TB or 2TiB. Since drive manu
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 22:52:36 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 22:31 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> No, it missed. The workaround of taking 'rhgb' out of the boot
> parameters was considered enough for Alpha. I've written the issue up on
> common bugs.
Sor
> Tested, It works with both UEFI and non UEFI
Thanks. Oh, by the way, the F16 package would love to get some testing too:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-16.16-1.fc16
Thanks everyone.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Fedora 18 "Spherical Cow" Alpha release is plumping up! This release
offers a preview of some of the best free and open source technology
currently under development. Model a glimpse of the future:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
Alread
> It should in fact do both. The fact that it doesn't is a bug.
> 'nomodeset' will have the effect of forcing the use of vesa in the
> case
> of *most* drivers, these days, since they have no UMS code any more.
> But
> it's really more of a lucky side-effect, and it's not 100%; for
> drivers
> whic
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Before we officially release F18 Alpha, we need this pushed to stable updates:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-17.15-1.fc17
>
> You don't have to have a UEFI machine to test this, smoke testing is OK too.
> Just >pleas
> > Do we need any _name_ at all?
> > The email announcement can just say "F18 Alpha RC3 has passed all
> > testing and will be released as F18 Alpha".
> > And the schedule can just say "Alpha Availability".
>
> It's more state of release candidate compose than name - but of
> course,
> I think we
While doing a yum update of F18 this morning I encountered the below error.
Any information as to what/why this is would be
appreciated.
Running Transaction
Updating : tzdata-2012f-1.fc18.noarch
1/40
Upda
Before we officially release F18 Alpha, we need this pushed to stable updates:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-17.15-1.fc17
You don't have to have a UEFI machine to test this, smoke testing is OK too.
Just please try whether you can create a bootable USB stick from an ISO an
On 09/15/2012 07:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-09-15 10:47, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am seeing a LOT of confusion about what Alpha, Beta and Release
levels. Several people saw the world GOLD and thought that it meant
this was the final release.. other people saw Alpha Release Candid
On 09/18/2012 02:07 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 09/18/2012 08:45 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Do we need any_name_ at all?
The email announcement can just say "F18 Alpha RC3 has passed all
testing and will be released as F18 Alpha".
And the schedule can just say "Alpha Availability".
My
On 18/09/12 03:38, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If the user can't make a choice, they should be using a live image, IMO;
the entire point of the DVD install has always been that it provided
a choice of things for the user to install.
For the end user, those that know, will know what to do.
Those who
On 09/18/2012 02:38 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If the user can't make a choice, they should be using a live image, IMO;
the entire point of the DVD install has always been that it provided
a choice of things for the user to install. Instead of the prior DVD,
which offered a variety of co-dependen
On 09/18/2012 06:01 AM, drago01 wrote:
Stop trolling please.
I should rather say that you should stop trolling
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Sure but what's wrong with providing a default choice? It does not
>> conflict with the goal of providing a choice.
>> The user is still free to uncheck the checkbox if he really knows
>> what
>> he is doing.
>
> I agree. There would be no do
On 09/18/2012 08:45 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Do we need any_name_ at all?
The email announcement can just say "F18 Alpha RC3 has passed all testing and will
be released as F18 Alpha".
And the schedule can just say "Alpha Availability".
My bikeshed color is no color at all.
Agreed
"Alpha" "Bet
- Original Message -
> > For Alpha, I used GOLD as used in the past but I'm open to a new
> > wording. I like "Public Alpha"/"Public Beta" as suggested in the
> > thread.
> > I talked to a few people around and they use it.
> >
> > Public Alpha = latest RC compose used for redistribution/m
> For Alpha, I used GOLD as used in the past but I'm open to a new
> wording. I like "Public Alpha"/"Public Beta" as suggested in the
> thread.
> I talked to a few people around and they use it.
>
> Public Alpha = latest RC compose used for redistribution/mirroring
> Public Alpha Availability = th
> > 'The installer must be able to install each of the release blocking
> > desktops, as well as the minimal package set, for each supported
> > installation method (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
> >
> > Comments please.
>
> I'm fine with that except I'd just drop the "(DVD, live, netinst,
> PXE
> Sure but what's wrong with providing a default choice? It does not
> conflict with the goal of providing a choice.
> The user is still free to uncheck the checkbox if he really knows
> what
> he is doing.
I agree. There would be no downside to having GNOME Desktop selected by
default, just a fe
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:07 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > At the F18 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, the Fedora 18
> > Alpha release was declared GOLD. F18 Alpha will be released
> > Tuesday,
> > September 18, 2012.
>
> It's been suggested that we shou
On Út, 2012-09-11 at 14:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 10:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 2012-09-06 6:54, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> we should amend the beta criterion:
> > >>
> > >> 'At the package installation stage, the install should show no
> >
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 10:47 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:36:21 +0200
> Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>
>
>
> > The underlaying code raises an exception in a separate thread and
> > with a stack containing non-ascii characters (worst case scenario
> > designed from the bugs in ex
29 matches
Mail list logo
