The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20404/libtiff-3.9.7-1.fc16
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20151/tomcat-7.0.33-1.fc16
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-201
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20224/Django-1.4.3-1.fc17
2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20446/libtiff-3.9.7-1.fc17
8
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2000
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 12:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:19 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
> > is now available for testing.
>
> Please note a TC4 may land soon as well with new anaconda, so be aw
#325: Update sync fails if update title is too long
---+---
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 18
#326: PkgGit links still try to use gitweb instead of cgit
---+---
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone:
#324: Proven Tester Request
--+
Reporter: adityad | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mento
#326: PkgGit links still try to use gitweb instead of cgit
--+
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Fed
#325: Update sync fails if update title is too long
--+
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 18
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:19 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
> is now available for testing.
Please note a TC4 may land soon as well with new anaconda, so be aware
of that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: ada
=
#fedora-bugzappers: f18final-blocker-review-5
=
The review today started as an extension of the QA meeting earlier and
thus, didn't have an announcement beforehand.
Since we're running out of time before F18
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:41 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:36:55 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
> > 1. The output of the df command in
> >the preceding coreutils.x86_64 0:8.17-6.fc18 contains a line for
> >the root FS
> > 2. The output of the actual mount command
#324: Proven Tester Request
-+--
Reporter: adityad | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Reque
On 12/17/12 08:54, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:22:53 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
>> Very odd, works for me:
>> rpm -q coreutils
>> coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64
>
> Do you see an rpc_pipefs entry in the output of mount?
> If not, you may simply be unable to reproduce.
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 06:04 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> This test case is a bit confusing:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_startup
>
> As Lukas Brabec found out, it requires people to create an encrypted setup by
> using the text mode, which is no longer supported by F18 anacond
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:22:53 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> Very odd, works for me:
> rpm -q coreutils
> coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64
Do you see an rpc_pipefs entry in the output of mount?
If not, you may simply be unable to reproduce.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/887763
--
Fedora release
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20117/v8-3.13.7.5-1.fc18
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20111/rssh-2.3.4-1.fc18
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20348/li
On 12/17/12 08:18, ergodic wrote:
> Jachim, which df (coreutils) are you using?
>
> I am using: coreutils-8.15-9.fc17.x86_64
>
>
>
>
>
> I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
>
> Screenshot attached.
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:8 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
Jachim, which df (coreutils) are you using?
I am using: coreutils-8.15-9.fc17.x86_64
- Original Message -
I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
Screenshot attached.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, ergodic < g...@embarqmail.com > wrote:
This is also happ
Well...Then why?
[root@xxx]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 3046148 0 3046148 0% /dev
tmpfs3056848 252 3056596 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs3056848 1440 3055408 1% /run
/dev/sda2 15346336 6825044
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:50:43 +0530, RaJ M wrote:
> I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
Much more interesting are those cases where it doesn't (!) work.
And the coreutils package version, not uname -r.
> Screenshot attached.
No need to prove it with a 300KB screenshot, whic
> Hi,
>
> as part of my work on final criteria/test cases interconnection I
> wrote
> this test case [1]. It should check that criteria:
>
> * A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files
> used to build the release must be present in the release repository.
> The
> included
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:50:43 +0530
RaJ M wrote:
> I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
>
> Screenshot attached.
>
Pleas stop top-posting
It brings forward the Apocalypse
You may have an old version test with:
coreutils-8.15-9.fc17
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/build
This is also happening with Fedora 17.
- Original Message -
On 17.12.2012 10:07, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
> F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the size of
> the root filesystem:
>
>> df
> Filesys
Hi,
as part of my work on final criteria/test cases interconnection I wrote
this test case [1]. It should check that criteria:
* A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files
used to build the release must be present in the release repository. The
included kickstarts must def
On 12/16/2012 03:48 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: rpmfusion-free-updates/18/x86_64
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
comment out the mirrorlist line in /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*.repo and
uncomment the baseurl line. Your s
Compose started at Mon Dec 17 09:15:50 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
Compose started at Mon Dec 17 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[Agda]
Agda-2.3.0.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
ghc(Agda-2.3.0.1-ad754944fc95f11aa3b4710387ff959a)
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires pyt
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:19:27 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> [root@fedora18desk ~]# uname -r
> 3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64
Not the latest for F18, and "rpm -q coreutils" is more relevant in this case.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.10-5.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.08 0.03 0.10
--
test mailing lis
-
Original Message-R
eply-to: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Subject: Re: The output of the command "df" (without any param) omits
the line for the root filesystem
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:05:09 +0100
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:45:19 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:45:19 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> > Anybody sees this too?
> >
>
> Yes, I'm. I haven't noticed that earlier but now I can confirm that /
> (root) is not on the list produced by df.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/887763
has been filed by Joachim meanwhile.
--
Fedora
On 17.12.2012 10:07, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
> F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the size of
> the root filesystem:
>
>> df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> devtmpfs
This test case is a bit confusing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_startup
As Lukas Brabec found out, it requires people to create an encrypted setup by
using the text mode, which is no longer supported by F18 anaconda. We need to
adjust it, the question is how.
I have to say I'
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:41:47 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Well, the link given earlier,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20166/coreutils-8.17-7.fc18
> shows that this coreutils test update is on its way to stable
> updates already (becoming a zero day update for F1
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:36:55 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> 1. The output of the df command in
>the preceding coreutils.x86_64 0:8.17-6.fc18 contains a line for
>the root FS
> 2. The output of the actual mount command shows a line for the root FS!
>
>mount
>...
>/dev/sda8 on
On 12/17/2012 05:07 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
> F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the size of
> the root filesystem:
>
>> df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> devtmpfs
On 12/17/2012 10:23 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:07:09 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>> Hi F18 testers,
>>
>> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
>
> Why do you state this package? Is the problem specific to that package
> and cannot be reproduced with the
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:07:09 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
Why do you state this package? Is the problem specific to that package
and cannot be reproduced with the older one? Have you tried a downgrade
yet? "yum downgrade co
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:07:09 +0100
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F18 testers,
>
> On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
> F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the
> size of the root filesystem:
~$ df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
ro
Hi F18 testers,
On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
F18 box, the command "df" without any param does not output the size of
the root filesystem:
> df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 16527000 1652700 0% /dev
tmpfs
40 matches
Mail list logo
