Re: imsettings

2012-12-20 Thread generic
(2012/12/21 6:53), Gene Czarcinski wrote: There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up with a dependency problem. This means that you cannot update a current F18beta. This means that an install fails because of it. The claim is that imsettings-desktop-module(x86_64

sshd and LiveCDs

2012-12-20 Thread Ed Greshko
I don't normally install from LiveCDs but I did so today to get KDE without GNOME. I was surprised to find that when all was installed that sshd service was disabled. Does anyone know the logic behind that choice? -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build big

Re: What has changed and/or how to control

2012-12-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/21/2012 09:50 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:44:50 +0800 > Ed Greshko wrote: > >> What has changed in a default install for that to happen? And what needs to >> be changed? locale is the same on both systems. > I don't know for sure, but I'd compare the preference settings

Re: What has changed and/or how to control

2012-12-20 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:44:50 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > What has changed in a default install for that to happen? And what needs to > be changed? locale is the same on both systems. I don't know for sure, but I'd compare the preference settings of the terminal app you are using. There may be so

What has changed and/or how to control

2012-12-20 Thread Ed Greshko
I've not run into this beforeso I'm baffled. On my F17 system I get this, and it is what I expect. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ 八 bash: 八: command not found... However, on my F18 test VM I get this. [egreshko@localhost ~]$ 八 bash: $'\345\205\253': command not found Which is, of course, the Unicode

Re: imsettings

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 20:03 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On 12/20/2012 05:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > >> There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up > >> with a dependency problem. > >> > >> This means

Re: imsettings

2012-12-20 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 12/20/2012 05:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up with a dependency problem. This means that you cannot update a current F18beta. This means that an install fails bec

Re: An arbitrarily sized /tmp does not fit all

2012-12-20 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/20/2012 09:03 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: For whatever reason Anaconda generates a separate file system for /tmp using an arbitrary size. One one machine it is about 4GB, causing Brasero to fail on larger jobs. Meanwhile there is some 30GB unused in the root filesystem. If

Re: imsettings

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up > with a dependency problem. > > This means that you cannot update a current F18beta. > > This means that an install fails because of it. > > The claim is that im

Re: Configure Mount Point doesn't appear to work

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 01:47 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 20, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >> What if you hit Apply Changes? > > > > A blast from circa 1995: The UI updates to reflect the change I made in > >

imsettings

2012-12-20 Thread Gene Czarcinski
There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up with a dependency problem. This means that you cannot update a current F18beta. This means that an install fails because of it. The claim is that imsettings-desktop-module(x86_64) = 1.5.1-1.fc18 is required. imsettings

Re: does final criteria #8 mean lvm-on-raid must be available?

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 08:49 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I tried to make a mirrored /boot partition, and then a second mirrored > partition with an LVM volume group on top of that (including / and /home > partitions). The current UI doesn't offer this, although it was easy to do > in the old one.

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Jim
On 12/20/2012 03:06 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: On 12/20/2012 11:11 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:43 -0800, Stephen Sheldon wrote: On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote: On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push

Re: An arbitrarily sized /tmp does not fit all

2012-12-20 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:03:37PM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > For whatever reason Anaconda generates a separate file system for /tmp > using an arbitrary size. One one machine it is about 4GB, causing Brasero > to fail on larger jobs. Meanwhile there is some 30GB unused in the r

An arbitrarily sized /tmp does not fit all

2012-12-20 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
For whatever reason Anaconda generates a separate file system for /tmp using an arbitrary size. One one machine it is about 4GB, causing Brasero to fail on larger jobs. Meanwhile there is some 30GB unused in the root filesystem. If /tmp is no longer part of / then its size should be easily adju

Re: Configure Mount Point doesn't appear to work

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Ryniker
>> Swap is a bit odd. > >I don't see it as being any more or less odd than any other mount point. It's >either manual partitioning or not. Swap is indeed odd. An unusual swap partition on an F18 target installation disk can scuttle anaconda... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=88624

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Stephen Sheldon
On 12/20/2012 11:11 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:43 -0800, Stephen Sheldon wrote: On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote: On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a window above the top of the screen in gnome 3,

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:43 -0800, Stephen Sheldon wrote: > On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote: > > On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: > >> I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a > >> window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell > >> or

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:59:18PM -0500, Jim wrote: > On 12/20/2012 01:43 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: > >>If I remember you hold the Alt key down and move your window > >>with the mouse, left button locked on window > >That is what I am doing. It works in xfce, but not in gnome. > That is unusua

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Jim
On 12/20/2012 01:43 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote: On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell or fallback mode. I do not see

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Stephen Sheldon
On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote: On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell or fallback mode. I do not see any options for mutter or metacity in dconf to

Re: fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Jim
On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote: I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell or fallback mode. I do not see any options for mutter or metacity in dconf to do this. This still works in xfce.

fc18 on eeepc 701

2012-12-20 Thread Stephen Sheldon
I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell or fallback mode. I do not see any options for mutter or metacity in dconf to do this. This still works in xfce. Am I missing something? -- test mailing list

Re: does final criteria #8 mean lvm-on-raid must be available?

2012-12-20 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 12/20/2012 07:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I tried to make a mirrored /boot partition, and then a second mirrored > partition with an LVM volume group on top of that (including / and /home > partitions). The current UI doesn't offer this, although it was easy to do > in the old one. Just FYI,

F-18 Branched report: 20121220 changes

2012-12-20 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Dec 20 09:17:45 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure] python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.0.3-1.fc18.noarch requires fedmsg >= 0:0.6.1 Broken deps for i386

does final criteria #8 mean lvm-on-raid must be available?

2012-12-20 Thread Matthew Miller
I tried to make a mirrored /boot partition, and then a second mirrored partition with an LVM volume group on top of that (including / and /home partitions). The current UI doesn't offer this, although it was easy to do in the old one. I'm not exactly excited about holding things up further, but do

Thanks to Red Hat for providing more QA help

2012-12-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Adam has posted info about a new paid QA position http://www.happyassassin.net/2012/12/19/come-work-for-us-red-hat-is-looking-for-another-fedora-qa-community-person/ which hopefully will result in a new person being able to help out or one of the current QA guys being able to help out more. The

Re: Fedora 18

2012-12-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:19:15 -0600 Jim Bennett wrote: > I have not been able to update Fedora 18 for about a week now > because it will never boot once I update. Is there a work around or > anything I can do. > > Thank you > Jim Bennett Provide some information. It won't boot, is in the realm o

Fedora 18

2012-12-20 Thread Jim Bennett
I have not been able to update Fedora 18 for about a week now because it will never boot once I update. Is there a work around or anything I can do. Thank you Jim Bennett -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Configure Mount Point doesn't appear to work

2012-12-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 20, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> What if you hit Apply Changes? > > A blast from circa 1995: The UI updates to reflect the change I made in > Configure Mount Point. Or I get a crash. *sigh* Chris Murphy -- tes

Re: Configure Mount Point doesn't appear to work

2012-12-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > What if you hit Apply Changes? A blast from circa 1995: The UI updates to reflect the change I made in Configure Mount Point. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Configure Mount Point doesn't appear to work

2012-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 23:46 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >>> > >> > >> Try it with something other than swap before drawing any conclusions. > > > > swap was just an exampl