Rawhide heads up: Booting in enforcing mode doesn't seem to work

2013-01-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
To reboot I need to use the enforcing=0 kernel parameter. Switch to enforcing after booting seems to work. This is filed as bug 903486 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903486). I have also tried the selinux build from today and see the same thing, so tomorrow's rawhide will have th

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yum Upgrade -- A couple of issues

2013-01-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 13:14 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: > Yes, the .xsession-errors (quoted under the message) was it. I feel > stupid now. I looked into running services and indeed polkit and upower > had "failed" state. > > # yum reinstall polkit\* upower > # reboot > > fixed the issue complet

Using flags for blocker bug tracking

2013-01-23 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. So I just wanted to kick off a discussion on the merits or otherwise of using flags for tracking blocker bugs. If you're not aware how Bugzilla flags work, http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.4/en/html/flags-overview.html gives an overview. A flag is just a named attribute of the bug with f

Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-23 Thread Tim Flink
After FUDCon last weekend and some other conversations that I've had (mostly over IRC), we're planning to implement a more user-friendly bug submission system in the blocker tracking app. I put the details that I have now in the form of a blog post [1] if anyone is interested. The version that wil

Re: Anyone else seeing yum running slow in rawhide?

2013-01-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:32:08 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Is the machine on wireless? I have had issues with the iwlwifi driver being slow or locking up. No. I have a local mirror on that machine for my home machines. The slow down seems to be especially noticeable while doing dependency

Re: Anyone else seeing yum running slow in rawhide?

2013-01-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:01:32 -0600 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > For about the last month or so it seems like yum has been running > much slower than in the past. Previously I had seen something similar > when running debug kernels, but that isn't the case now. > > I am seeing a lot of time being use

Re: Anyone else seeing yum running slow in rawhide?

2013-01-23 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 01/23/2013 11:01 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: For about the last month or so it seems like yum has been running much slower than in the past. Previously I had seen something similar when running debug kernels, but that isn't the case now. I am seeing a lot of time being used for wait, but there

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-01-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1341/tinymce-spellchecker-2.0.5-8.fc17 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1076/drupal7-7.19-1.fc17 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2013-01-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0723/thunderbird-17.0.2-1.fc16 43 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20157/libproxy-0.4.11-1.fc16 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Re: Anyone else seeing yum running slow in rawhide?

2013-01-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:01:32 -0600 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Was there any change to yum that would have potentially caused this? I'm convinced there is a speed increase. Even with createrepo rebuilding a local repo. -- Regards, Frank ln -s http//www.frankly3d.com http://www.frankly3d.eu -

Anyone else seeing yum running slow in rawhide?

2013-01-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
For about the last month or so it seems like yum has been running much slower than in the past. Previously I had seen something similar when running debug kernels, but that isn't the case now. I am seeing a lot of time being used for wait, but there is still a lot of idle time as well. So I su

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-23 Thread Karel Volný
Dne St 23. ledna 2013 09:45:28, Fernando Cassia napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Yeah, 'all the compatibility testing' is something of a vague idea to > > pin down :) > > Why can´t Fedora ship both? let users decide whether to use MySQL > Community edition

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-23 Thread Kellerman Rivero Suarez
El 23/01/2013 08:18, "Fernando Cassia" escribió: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Yeah, 'all the compatibility testing' is something of a vague idea to > > pin down :) > > Why can´t Fedora ship both? let users decide whether to use MySQL > Community edition or M

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-23 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Yeah, 'all the compatibility testing' is something of a vague idea to > pin down :) Why can´t Fedora ship both? let users decide whether to use MySQL Community edition or MariaDB. After all it isn´t like size is an issue, given the DVD

Re: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process, improvements to blocker / freeze exception tracker aliases

2013-01-23 Thread Kamil Paral
> There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the > final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the > first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the > list archives). So I decided to go ahead and Just Do It, putting the > proposal into