Fedora 18 kickstart, WiFi and secondary repositories

2013-01-25 Thread ajsfedora
When Anaconda loads my kickstart file I get a warning that dracut does not support wifi and so my wireless interface needs to be configured manually through the GUI. Since Anaconda can't connect to the repos that I've specified using the 'repo' command in my kickstart file, it gets confused and ev

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread TK009
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > I'm not sure it's wise to increase privileges immediately after the welcome > letter (was it > meant this way?). The bugzappers have been doing it that way since I joined. It was explained to me when I joined that anything done incorrectly

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread TK009
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Here's another thing that's been on my todo list for a while. > > So we still get proventester and bugzapper membership requests > regularly, and poor old dr johnson and to a small degree myself > laboriously go around telling pe

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2013-01-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0723/thunderbird-17.0.2-1.fc16 45 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20157/libproxy-0.4.11-1.fc16 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-01-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1341/tinymce-spellchecker-2.0.5-8.fc17 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1076/drupal7-7.19-1.fc17 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

2013-01-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/23/2013 02:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Bill Nottingham writes: Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: (If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available,

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 03:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:34 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have all the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually hide the text on the proventesters and BZ

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Tim Flink
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:47:31 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > > The current idea is to login with FAS and do one of two things > > 1. populate the field with the user's FAS email (assuming that > > bugzilla cc doesn't require a registered user) > > Unfortunately this doesn't work, I just tr

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:34 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have all > > the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually > > hide the text on the proventesters and BZ pages that describes the > > 'joining

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have > all > the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually > hide the text on the proventesters and BZ pages that describes the > 'joining' processes. When we first hibernated the PT process we kinda > thought i

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 01:24 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: Hash: SHA1 So Adam let me see if I get it straight. During my hiatus from testing {known as the F17 acceptance cycle} you mothballed the ProvenTesters and BugZappers programs, but left some stray references to them laying around the wikisphere. Ada

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding

2013-01-25 Thread Bob Lightfoot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So Adam let me see if I get it straight. During my hiatus from testing {known as the F17 acceptance cycle} you mothballed the ProvenTesters and BugZappers programs, but left some stray references to them laying around the wikisphere. You want to furt

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> The current idea is to login with FAS and do one of two things > 1. populate the field with the user's FAS email (assuming that > bugzilla cc doesn't require a registered user) Unfortunately this doesn't work, I just tried it. The email must match a registered BZ account. -- test mailing

Re: Proposing Blocker/Freeze Exception Bugs Through the Blocker Tracking App

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> > > * I don't understand the "Release Number" in the HTML form much. > > > We're working on a single release at a time. What's the purpose? > > > > The thought was to support proposing blockers against the next > > release, > > not just the release which is currently under development. Not sure

Re: Using flags for blocker bug tracking

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> > 3) create 2 flags: accepted and rejected. These could be used with > > the > > tracking bugs to indicate state: > > > > Proposed Alpha Blocker: > > blocks fXXAlphaBlocker > > Accepted Alpha Blocker: > > blocks fXXAlphaBlocker > > accepted+ > > Rejected Alpha Blocker > > d

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 06:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! Here's another thing that's been on my todo list for a while. So we still get proventester and bugzapper membership requests regularly, and poor old dr johnson and to a small degree myself laboriously go around telling people 'hi, thanks

Re: [Fedora QA] #329: Add Support for Alembic

2013-01-25 Thread Fedora QA
#329: Add Support for Alembic ---+- Reporter: tflink| Owner: mkrizek Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker p