Fedora 17 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 287 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 99 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 04/18/2013 08:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: No, they've had debug kernels for ages, but debug kernels got quite a lot slower with the 2.6.40 release (IIRC). Before that the difference wasn't so great. Ah, time has flown. It seems just yesterday I read the discussions about when to enable/s

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 18/04/13 05:12 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Or post disclaimers that Alphas now use a slow, debug kernel and has high memory requirements. I believe F18 was the first to have a debug kernel/high RAM, correct? That's 17 previous releases that people were used to a "normal speed" system to te

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:12:05PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or > >'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on > >installed systems. > > When you

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or 'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on installed systems. When you want the mass public to test the image you produced, it doesn't help when it is a

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 18/04/13 04:41 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: 19 Alpha RC4 _x86_64 net install with Gnome Desktop installs no problem on Fedora 17 KVM on a dual-core 2GHz with 2GB RAM. Took a while & the 'Green Screen of Nearly Death' on boot & shutdown was particularly tedious but I put that down mostly to the pau

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 18/04/13 02:36 PM, moshe nahmias wrote: I didn't do anything special. When I open the virtual machine and go to view->details on overview details are as follows: Hhpervisor: qemu architecture: 64 bit emulator: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 Hum, that's odd - all looks pretty normal. I guess I

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 04/17/2013 02:35 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still > oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3). > > As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 > (RC4) is now available for testing. Content informa

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

I didn't do anything special. When I open the virtual machine and go to view->details on overview details are as follows: Hhpervisor: qemu architecture: 64 bit emulator: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 operating system host name: unknown product name: unknown machine settings enable acpi: checked ena

Backlight control on GNOME bug test

Can you test this bug in Fedora with GNOME ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922192 -- Best Regards, Brain. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On 18/04/13 02:07 AM, moshe nahmias wrote: Hi, I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso from the link above on virt on fedora 18. The install don't work. It says that dracut-initqueue[284]

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha status, karma requests

On 17/04/13 04:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! So, good news: following the blocker review meeting this morning, we're looking quite close to signing off on Alpha. We just need to fill out the RC4 test matrices before tomorrow's go/no-go meeting, and hope we don't find any more blocker b

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 18/04/13 03:39 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - On 04/18/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perhaps if I let it sit overnight anaconda might display, but then I'd have to wait a week for it to install at this pa

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/2013 12:29 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > What is the "official version" and how does it differ from > the Rpmfusion version? https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads It doesn't differ from the RPMFusion version. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/2013 06:34 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Are using vbox from rpmfusion ? Please see my previous email: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-April/114890.html I saw it bef

test

Just a test, my email from this list is being blocked somewhere. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/18/2013 10:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 09:43 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 04/18/2013 09:34 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 09:43 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 04/18/2013 09:34 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >>> Are using vbox from rpmfusion ? > >> > >> Please see my previous email:

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/18/2013 09:34 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> Are using vbox from rpmfusion ? >> >> Please see my previous email: >> http://lists.fedorap

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On Qui, 2013-04-18 at 08:20 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Are using vbox from rpmfusion ? > > Please see my previous email: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-April/114890.html I saw it before ask > In answer to your ques

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

I run virt via the graphic menu on mate. I use the default installation of virtual machine manager (as far as I remember) version number 0.9.5. Since I am pretty sure I didn't give the details you want... What exactly do you want to know? And how to get the info? On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:08 PM,

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Are using vbox from rpmfusion ? Please see my previous email: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-April/114890.html In answer to your question: No, I am using the official package. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

> Hi, > I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.iso from the link above on virt > on fedora 18. > The install don't work. > It says that dracut-initqueue[284] could not boot because /dev/root doesn't > exist. What virt tools do you use? How do you run it? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedor

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On Qua, 2013-04-17 at 20:54 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Is there a trick to getting F19 and VirtualBox to play nice? > > Host: > Fedora 18 x86_64 > VBox 4.2.12 > 3ghz quad core > > When I load the latest F19 Alpha LiveCD ISO it takes about 5 minutes > just to get to the desktop. Once th

F-19 Branched report: 20130418 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 18 09:15:19 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=

rawhide report: 20130418 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 18 08:15:41 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

- Original Message - > On 04/18/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > > I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perhaps if I let it > > sit overnight anaconda might display, but then I'd have to wait a week > > for it to install at this pace. > > > > I managed to get SSH

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

Another bit of info. Is it possible that it's because I use QEMU on my virt? If so, than how can I use something else? I am new at this, so a link to somewhere I can learn about it will be appreciated. Moshe On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, moshe nahmias wrote: > Hi, > I tried to install >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

Hi, I tried to install Fedora-19-Alpha-i386-DVD.isofrom the link above on virt on fedora 18. The install don't work. It says that dracut-initqueue[284] could not boot because /dev/root doesn't exist

Re: Screen Saver?

On 04/18/13 16:27, Kamil Paral wrote: >> I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. >> Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process >> and was a bit surprised to find it in "screen saver" mode when I got back. >> Screen was Black, but ret

Re: Screen Saver?

> I've been doing most of my testing by installing from the DVD to a VBox VM. > Today I decided to try the Live Desktop. I walked away from the process > and was a bit surprised to find it in "screen saver" mode when I got back. > Screen was Black, but returned to show the clock when the mouse was

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/2013 12:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 04/18/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perhaps if I let it sit overnight anaconda might display, but then I'd have to wait a week for it to install at this pace. I managed to get SS

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

Hi, " Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-19-Alpha-1.iso17-Apr-2013 02:24 709M ", this build seems to be the same code as the last build(s). Successful boot not possible on a Samsung X22 laptop. Kind Regards Joerg -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Andre Robatino An: test-announce Vers

Re: F19 alpha and VirtualBox

On 04/18/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perhaps if I let it sit overnight anaconda might display, but then I'd have to wait a week for it to install at this pace. I managed to get SSH running by starting in "3" and then switching to "