# F19 Beta Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2013-04-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The first blocker review meeting for F19 Beta will be held tomorrow.
Should be a short one, just a few proposed blockers so far.
We'll be runn
Just a heads-up, folks - I completed the Beta criteria revisions,
following the general model from Alpha (as previously discussed in
thread "Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal"), and put the
revised version into place just in time for tomorrow's first Beta
blocker review meeting. Of c
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
292
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
104
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On 23/04/13 12:20 PM, moshe nahmias wrote:
Is there any needed knowledge for doing this? I don't know (at least
yet) most of what is needed most likely but can do it time wise. If
there is a link to learn what's needed then I can do it (any way I will
ask here for improvements but its better if I
On 23/04/13 07:45 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
Dear QArs,
I would think that having serious minded users of Fedora participating
in the test days would be appreciated.
The actual testing itself is no problem but reporting the results
seems to require a 'certificate' (log in with a FAS account)
Is there any needed knowledge for doing this? I don't know (at least yet)
most of what is needed most likely but can do it time wise. If there is a
link to learn what's needed then I can do it (any way I will ask here for
improvements but its better if I will know what I am doing [?]
)
On Tue, A
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:55:26 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Branch Freeze Policy page got outdated with not following freeze from
> branch time anymore, I marked it there but otherwise it's pretty nice
> described there. I tried to add a few details regarding it to Change
> Deadline page
On 04/24/13 00:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Mirrors had quite a few days to sync it. It should be the same as RC4 or you
> can try
>
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/19-Alpha/Live/x86_64/
Yes, that is what I ended up doing. Thanks
--
The only thing worse th
On 23 April 2013 08:15, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/23/13 21:49, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > The Fedora 19 "Schrödinger's Cat" alpha release has arrived with a
> > preview of the latest fantastic, free, and open source technology
> > currently under development. Take a peek inside:
> >
> > http://fed
On 23 April 2013 08:45, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> Dear QArs,
>
> I would think that having serious minded users of Fedora participating
> in the test days would be appreciated.
>
> The actual testing itself is no problem but reporting the results
> seems to require a 'certificate' (log in with
Dear QArs,
I would think that having serious minded users of Fedora participating
in the test days would be appreciated.
The actual testing itself is no problem but reporting the results
seems to require a 'certificate' (log in with a FAS account) and
arcane contortions with Wiki pages.
I don't
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:30:15PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Count me in for Nouveau - I have a problem I've been trying to nail
> down for months on my ancient GeForce 6150SE nForce 430. Symptoms
> (Fedora 18) none with 3.6 kernel. With 3.7 or later, GNOME desktop
> comes up but as so
On 04/23/13 21:49, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> The Fedora 19 "Schrödinger's Cat" alpha release has arrived with a
> preview of the latest fantastic, free, and open source technology
> currently under development. Take a peek inside:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
I hate it when the announ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Fedora 19 "Schrödinger's Cat" alpha release has arrived with a
preview of the latest fantastic, free, and open source technology
currently under development. Take a peek inside:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
*** What is the Alpha Releas
Hi Ani
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Ani Peter wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Thank you all for your time and support in making Fedora 19 testing event
> a success. For further improving the l10 test event, please feel free to
> provide all your feedbacks at [1].
[1] is missing
Rahul
--
test mail
Why deleted wayland test cases?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Tue Apr 23 08:15:41 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[amide]
amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit
Dear All,
Thank you all for your time and support in making Fedora 19 testing
event a success. For further improving the l10 test event, please feel
free to provide all your feedbacks at [1]. Noriko and Shankar have
provided very valuable suggestions and feedback and we would really like
to t
> Trying to yum upgrade 19 is stuck on a mirror with no useful throughput. What
> kind of workaround for this is available? Nothing jumps at me in the yum man
> page. How do I specify to use a particular mirror know to work?
If the speed is below some threshold, yum should blacklist the mirror and
19 matches
Mail list logo