rawhide report: 20130512 changes

2013-05-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun May 12 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [claws-mail-plugins] claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122 [dragonegg]

F-19 Branched report: 20130512 changes

2013-05-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun May 12 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =

Re: Telnet server broken in TC4

2013-05-12 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 14:13 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I gave the systemctl command and rebooted. Here is the result. I get the same result on the target system with telnet localhost. Can't you use ssh instead anyway since it's on by default on all installations now? I

Re: Telnet server broken in TC4

2013-05-12 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
On 05/12/2013 09:24 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 14:13 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I gave the systemctl command and rebooted. Here is the result. I get the same result on the target system with telnet localhost. Can't you use ssh instead anyway since it's on

Btrfs label set incorrectly

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959727 In the case of creating two btrfs volumes, one of them consistently has a default label fedora rather than the user specified name. There isn't a release criteria that I'm finding which covers this case, but considering the UI lets me specify

Guided partitioning is fundamentally broken for Btrfs default use

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
Originally I was thinking the installer's assertion that Btrfs is not resizable just needed a verbiage change to Resize unsupported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962143 But there's a consequence that makes this a show stopper for Btrfs becoming the eventual default file system.

Re: Guided partitioning is fundamentally broken for Btrfs default use

2013-05-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 14:08 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Originally I was thinking the installer's assertion that Btrfs is not resizable just needed a verbiage change to Resize unsupported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962143 But there's a consequence that makes this a show

Re: Guided partitioning is fundamentally broken for Btrfs default use

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 12, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Just delete the F18 partitions? Who said you had to resize them? If the identical behavior occurred with existing ext4 installations, and the stated work around was to delete the F18 install, people would be giving birth

Re: Beta TC4 karma requests

2013-05-12 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: If anyone has a UEFI install of Windows and can test installing F19 Beta TC4 alongside it, please do - the os-prober update should mean that the Windows install will now be present in Fedora's grub menu (before it was

Re: Guided partitioning is fundamentally broken for Btrfs default use

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 12, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On May 12, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Just delete the F18 partitions? Who said you had to resize them? If the identical behavior occurred with existing ext4 installations, and the

Re: Beta TC4 karma requests

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 12, 2013, at 4:18 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Found Windows Boot Manager on Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi Windows Boot Manager is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig. done Is this supposed to work with grub2-mkconfig also, or only from anaconda? It's

Re: Beta TC4 karma requests

2013-05-12 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: It's sorta messy to use GRUB2-EFI as a boot manager. Ideally the firmware manufacturer would supply a decent GUI boot manager so you can choose the OS, rather than rely on GRUB acting as a boot manager. The better

Re: Beta TC4 karma requests

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 12, 2013, at 4:40 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: I already use gummiboot, since GRUB2 can't boot Fedora on my system. [1] My main reason for trying this out was to see if GRUB2 could boot Windows, as that might be an interesting datapoint to add to that bug.

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-05-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 311 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 123 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 52

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

2013-05-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 124 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18 57 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18 51

Re: Beta TC4 karma requests

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 12, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: There's a debug line you can add to the grub.cfg, and possibly you'll get more information after the error but before the hang. Helps to read the whole bug first. I see the debug info. I can't reproduce this on Apple