Re: Youtube, not all songs-videos can be played, F19_64

2013-07-14 Thread Adam Pribyl
The first is adobe repository not flash itself. Adobe may have more packages for linux there, but they have only flash ATM. The name says nothing about flash. The advantage is that when you have flash package from repository any newer version of flash will install automatically with system

rawhide report: 20130714 changes

2013-07-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Jul 14 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [CCfits] CCfits-2.4-8.fc20.i686 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0 CCfits-2.4-8.fc20.x86_64 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0()(64bit) [MUMPS]

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-07-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 374 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 186 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 114

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2013-07-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 89 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5801/mantis-1.2.15-1.fc19 44 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9715/heat-jeos-9-1.fc19 32

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

2013-07-14 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 11:59 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: Getting back on topic, I propose the wiki page be modified to say that karma only depends on whether the package update works or not, irrespective of the update description. A 0 karma comment can be dropped, but not a -1. Another instance:

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

2013-07-14 Thread Christopher Meng
I hope we can have some enhancements in Bodhi 2.0. Such as add a single option for such case. I don't want to be bothered by such nosense karma anymore, too. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

2013-07-14 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Jul 14, 2013 6:21 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 11:59 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: Getting back on topic, I propose the wiki page be modified to say that karma only depends on whether the package update works or not, irrespective of the update

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

2013-07-14 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 19:47 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: Huh? The maintainer fixed the description and I just gave it the last +1 it needed to autopush stable. This worked exactly like it was supposed to. It was at -2 to start with. One more negative would've un-pushed a perfectly good