Fedora 17 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 375 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 187 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 115 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 188 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18 122 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18 115 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 90 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5801/mantis-1.2.15-1.fc19 45 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9715/heat-jeos-9-1.fc19 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10678/p

nss-3.15.1-1.fc19 update bundle needs karma

Hi all, The update at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12647/nss-util-3.15.1-1.fc19,nss-3.15.1-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.1-1.fc19 is getting good feedback lately but still needs some karma. If someone here could check it out I would be most grateful. Thanks in advance, Elio -

3.9.9.302

Hi gang, sorry I can't give a more technical-speak: I just had the system up on this test, tried to reboot for some reason and it hung at the circle for 20 seconds until I did control-alt-delete, and the same, new, 3.9.9.302 sat seemingly idle on boot after the circle filled for over 10 seconds,

Re: F19 java issues

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 15:34 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Hi, > I'm wondering what the story with java packaging on F19 is? There is a > version 1.8 and a version 1.7 however verion 1.7 apparently has no i686 > packages. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=431188 It cer

Re: Adjusting basic video driver testcase for UEFI systems

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 05:56 -0400, Jan Sedlak wrote: > So if I understand it correctly, appending "nomodeset" on BIOS system should > lead to usage of VESA driver On *most* BIOS systems. This will not be the case if the driver for your 'hardware' actually happens to work without kernel modesettin

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 13:27 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 19:47 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > > Huh? The maintainer fixed the description and I just gave it the last > > +1 it needed to autopush stable. This worked exactly like it was > > supposed to. > > It was at -2 to s

Re: fedup wrong----from fedora 17 to fedora 18

On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 12:14 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > 很简单，你看错误提示， > > You need to specify one with --instrepo > > 你需要指定 instrepo Note the message isn't really right: it should automatically find one. It seems to me that sometimes the initial fedup attempt fails with this error for some re

F19 java issues

Hi, I'm wondering what the story with java packaging on F19 is? There is a version 1.8 and a version 1.7 however verion 1.7 apparently has no i686 packages. This is not a problem for version 1.8 but the icedtea-web apparently only works with 1.7? What is required to have both the x86_64 and i68

rawhide report: 20130715 changes

Compose started at Mon Jul 15 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [CCfits] CCfits-2.4-8.fc20.i686 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0 CCfits-2.4-8.fc20.x86_64 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0()(64bit) [MUMPS] MUMPS-4.

Re: Adjusting basic video driver testcase for UEFI systems

So if I understand it correctly, appending "nomodeset" on BIOS system should lead to usage of VESA driver and appending "nomodeset" on UEFI system should lead to usage of GOP via efifb driver, so this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984455 is incorrect behaviour. - Original Mess