# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #9
# Date: 2013-08-21
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Well, it's that time again - time to review some blocker and fe bugs
for F20 alpha.
We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze excep
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
224
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
138
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4823/microcode_ctl-2.0-3.fc18
122
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
#404: Look through validation matrices and note which tests don't apply to ARM
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: pwhalen
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Wiki |Version:
#404: Look through validation matrices and note which tests don't apply to ARM
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: pwhalen
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Wiki |Version:
#404: Look through validation matrices and note which tests don't apply to ARM
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: pwhalen
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Wiki |Version:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 06:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
> > > Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
> > > changes are pretty simple.
> >
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:57 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > See my bug with my password:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957315
>
> I was avoiding pointing to the bug directly just in case someone else
> had reported
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 10:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
> >>> Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> See my bug with my password:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957315
I was avoiding pointing to the bug directly just in case someone else
had reported the same bug (and had exposed passwords as well). But you
are safe now:
See my bug with my password:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957315
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#404: Look through validation matrices and note which tests don't apply to ARM
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: pwhalen
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Wiki |Version:
Dne úterý, 20. srpna 2013 15:57:03 CEST, Kamil Paral napsal(a):
just a question ... are you aware that you can use those little arrows next
to search field to go through (highlighted) strings that abrt has
identified as potentially sensitive?
No, that is totally undiscoverable! Reported:
http
> just a question ... are you aware that you can use those little arrows next
> to search field to go through (highlighted) strings that abrt has identified
> as potentially sensitive?
No, that is totally undiscoverable! Reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998999
>
> - see atta
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
> Dne úterý, 20. srpna 2013 13:04:30 CEST, Kamil Paral napsal(a):
>
>> Yes, ABRT should make it easier to see the (potentially) private
>> information in the bug report (without searching through thousands of
>> lines).
>
>
> just a question ...
Dne úterý, 20. srpna 2013 13:04:30 CEST, Kamil Paral napsal(a):
Yes, ABRT should make it easier to see the (potentially)
private information in the bug report (without searching through
thousands of lines).
just a question ... are you aware that you can use those little arrows next to
search
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
> > > Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
> > > changes are pretty simple.
> >
在 2013-8-20 PM7:04，"Kamil Paral" 写道：
> Yes, ABRT should make it easier to see the (potentially) private
information in the bug report (without searching through thousands of
lines).
Yes, then I tell everyone that this email is related to abrt, when handling
gdm dump.
Pedro found my bug and got my
On 08/20/2013 10:35 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
changes are pretty simple.
As discussed at the QA meeting th
> Christopher, I think he meant about the feature that the ABRT will say which
> fields are the fields are the private fields that is shown.
> Kamil, am I right?
Yes, ABRT should make it easier to see the (potentially) private information in
the bug report (without searching through thousands of
Christopher, I think he meant about the feature that the ABRT will say
which fields are the fields are the private fields that is shown.
Kamil, am I right?
With regards, Moshe
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> 在 2013-8-20 PM5:48，"Kamil Paral" 写道：
>
> > Definitely. I als
> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Following on my little series, we also need to adjust the Base and
> > Desktop matrices for ARM as primary arch, but the good news is the
> > changes are pretty simple.
>
> As discussed at the QA meeting this morning, I've gone ahead
在 2013-8-20 PM5:48，"Kamil Paral" 写道：
> Definitely. I also miss this in ABRT. Could you please file a bug report
and link it here?
It's my bug related to gdm.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
- Original Message -
> Isn't it possible to list all the fields of the sensitive data?
> That way it will be easier for the user to see which data is compromised and
> at the very least the user won't have to go through all the data transmitted
> just to see that the user name is the only
> Hi, folks. I drafted up a simple ARM image deployment test case, as part
> of the wider effort to update the release criteria and validation test
> stuff for ARM:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_arm_image_deployment
>
> Next I'm going to draft up a new table f
> I have drafted up a set of proposed changes to the release criteria for
> the ARM as primary arch and visible cloud Changes. I've just done Alpha
> for now, as that's the most urgent, but I think the changes to Beta and
> Final should be directly derived from these - there shouldn't be
> anything
25 matches
Mail list logo
