The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
159
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
71
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13131/livecd-tools-18.17-1.fc18
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
On 2013-09-25 21:33 (GMT-0400) Gavin Flower composed:
On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
These make it easy t
On 26/09/13 15:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 09/25/2013 06:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
My concern is wether this procedure results in a kernel that is
less optimized for the CPU it is running on than if Fedora had
been installed directly on that machine.
I don't know enough about Fedora ins
On 09/25/2013 06:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
My concern is wether this procedure results in a kernel that is
less optimized for the CPU it is running on than if Fedora had
been installed directly on that machine.
I don't know enough about Fedora installation to know what,
if any, process
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:38:47PM -0400, David wrote:
> Well. Than answers that then. You now have a somewhat limited eclectic
David, please remember that the Fedora code of conduct applies to your
participation here. Without even getting into the appropriateness of the
metaphor you've chosen, th
On 09/25/13 20:38, David wrote:
> On 9/25/2013 9:33 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
>> On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote:
>>> On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
> On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>> Several of my machies have
On 9/25/2013 9:33 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote:
>> On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
> These make i
On 09/25/2013 06:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
When RC4 came out I installed it on a 4 TB drive using an
older E6550 machine. At my leisure I added lots of apps
and libs that I norma
On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
When RC4 came ou
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:13:48PM -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I don't know enough about Fedora installation to know what,
> if any, processor related optimizations are made in the install
> instead of boot time.
This is perfectly fine and will work, with one big exception -- by default,
On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
>> On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
>>> These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
>>>
>>> When RC4 came out I installed it
On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote:
On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
When RC4 came out I installed it on a 4 TB drive using an
older E6550 machine. At my leisure I added
On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
> These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
>
> When RC4 came out I installed it on a 4 TB drive using an
> older E6550 machine. At my leisure I added lots of apps
> and libs that
Several of my machies have SATA hot swap ports.
These make it easy to use smaller drives as backup media.
When RC4 came out I installed it on a 4 TB drive using an
older E6550 machine. At my leisure I added lots of apps
and libs that I normally use.
Then I slipped that drive in my omen.com serv
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 15:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> But more hilarity ensues when I use Gnome shell to change Device name.
> Static hostname is shifted to transient hostname, the entered name
> becomes the pretty name, and static has a - added to it in a way that
> makes no sense compared to
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 14:37 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I rebooted, changing nothing else. Now I can't ssh in as oldmac.local,
> I have to use f20s.local. And now transient doesn't show up. So if I
> change things, I get some changes in behavior. If I restart processes,
> I get more changes in be
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>> b. Disk value is 1.4TB. This computer has a 500GB drive in it and that's it.
>> No LVM thinp is being used either.
>
> What does gvfs-info -f / report ?
Filed as:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708786
Chris Murphy
--
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 23:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/IMG_20130924_185026.jpg
>>
>> Settings>System: Details
>>
>> a. Device name is showing hostnamectl transient name, not static name. I
>>
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> What does gvfs-info -f / report ?
[root@f20s ~]# gvfs-info -f /
attributes:
filesystem::size: 464519168000
filesystem::free: 459891695616
filesystem::type: btrfs
filesystem::used: 3916201984
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
On Sep 25, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> hostnamectl --static set-hostname f20s.localdomain
>> hostnamectl --transient set-hostname oldmac.localdomain
>
> OK so just did that and now I'm getting different behavior.
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 18:17 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
> The Fedora bugzilla, even if occasionally non-responsive, is
> *very* convenient. One can at least see if other users are
> experiencing the same issue. And other Fedora users cat
> at least leave bug comments that might aid other users
> (e
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:51 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > On 09/24/2013 07:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 17:08 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > >> Łukasz Posadowski (m...@lukaszposadowski.pl) said:
> > >>> Fedora,
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 23:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/IMG_20130924_185026.jpg
>
> Settings>System: Details
>
> a. Device name is showing hostnamectl transient name, not static name. I just
> tried this in F19 and it shows the static name. So this se
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-1
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-25/f20beta-blocker-review-1.2013-09-25-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://me
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:26 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > By my understanding, if there's a 'transient' hostname then it is likely
> > to be the currently "active" hostname, not the 'static' one.
>
> Well that's a problem. Linguistically
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> The commands should be:
>
> hostnamectl --static set-hostname f20s.localdomain
> hostnamectl --transient set-hostname oldmac.localdomain
>
> Not sure what happens if you place the options after the commands.
Yes I see in the ma
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> hostnamectl --static set-hostname f20s.localdomain
> hostnamectl --transient set-hostname oldmac.localdomain
OK so just did that and now I'm getting different behavior.
1. man hostnamectl says "The static hostname is stored in /et
On 09/25/2013 09:11 AM, Chris Murphy issued this missive:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:00 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 23:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/IMG_20130924_185026.jpg
Settings>System: Details
a. Device name is showing hostnam
On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 12:42 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Can we create 1GB/4GB/8GB images separately from now on for different people?
>
> God, no. Then we have three images to test, check the size of, and prune
> while keeping a sane p
On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:00 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 23:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/IMG_20130924_185026.jpg
>>
>> Settings>System: Details
>>
>> a. Device name is showing hostnamectl transient name, not static name. I
>> j
On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> By my understanding, if there's a 'transient' hostname then it is likely
> to be the currently "active" hostname, not the 'static' one.
Well that's a problem. Linguistically transient means impermanent, so it should
be the least likely ho
#420: Power management testday
--+
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Blocking:
On 09/25/2013 02:43 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hi,
I'll try to organize a few people locally in Sofia to
participate in Fedora 20 test days, currently interested in
Virtualization Test Day and Gnome Test Day on Oct 8th and 10th.
looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-10_Gnome_3
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'll try to organize a few people locally in Sofia to
> > participate in Fedora 20 test days, currently interested in
> > Virtualization Test Day and Gnome Test Day on Oct 8th and 10th.
>
> looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-10_Gnome_3.10 I
> see a few names
Anyone who plans to install F20 alpha where they will be re-using
existing LVM logical volumes should first look at this bugzilla report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009678
While the problem definitely shows up with a kickstart install it may
also be true with a regular instal
Another recap catch-up I'm afraid, folks - sorry!
Minutes and transcripts of the meetings between 2013-08-12 and
2013-09-23 are now available on the Wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130812
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130819
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meet
> # F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #1
> # Date: 2013-09-25
> # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Tim, can you please add it to our calendar?
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/QA/
That would be awesome, thanks.
--
test mailing l
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 12:42 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Can we create 1GB/4GB/8GB images separately from now on for different people?
God, no. Then we have three images to test, check the size of, and prune
while keeping a sane package set for. Do you think we're *short* of
work, or something
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:51 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 07:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 17:08 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >> Łukasz Posadowski (m...@lukaszposadowski.pl) said:
> >>> Fedora, you did it again. :) But I hoped you would remember th
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 23:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3253801/IMG_20130924_185026.jpg
>
> Settings>System: Details
>
> a. Device name is showing hostnamectl transient name, not static name. I just
> tried this in F19 and it shows the static name. So this se
40 matches
Mail list logo
