On 28/09/13 13:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
They _really do_ keep coming up. What if we create a Fedora Old-Timers list
for this kind of discussion? I'm not even kidding -- I'
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
> I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
They _really do_ keep coming up. What if we create a Fedora Old-Timers list
for this kind of discussion? I'm not even kidding -- I'll join.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora
I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: "Clyde E. Kunkel"
Date: 09-27-2013 12:18 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Subject: Re: A different way of installing Fe
On 9/27/2013 6:27 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I'm not having any luck figuring out how Yum can be limited to
installing only hard dependencies when any given package is installed,
avoiding "nice to have" things that take time to install and update that
I'll never use. If this is covered in the yum.con
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14029/zabbix-2.0.6-3.fc19
43
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19
8
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
I'm not having any luck figuring out how Yum can be limited to installing
only hard dependencies when any given package is installed, avoiding "nice to
have" things that take time to install and update that I'll never use. If
this is covered in the yum.conf man page I missed it. In zypper's zypp
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
160
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
72
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13131/livecd-tools-18.17-1.fc18
56
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17171/hplip-3.13.9-2.fc20
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17338/seamonkey-2.21-1.fc20
4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1739
On 09/27/2013 01:43 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 28/09/13 05:18, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/27/2013 01:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 22:06 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
I do find the 'who's been
using computers longer?' competitions that seem to be ensuing on all
sorts o
On 28/09/13 05:18, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/27/2013 01:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 22:06 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
I do find the 'who's been
using computers longer?' competitions that seem to be ensuing on all
sorts of lists lately a bit tiresome :)
Why tireso
This must be transient, even though it always happens for me, because otherwise
there wouldn't be the luks encryption blocker bug for the rescue kernel. That
person obviously has an initramfs. Yet there's an old F19 bug that was never
proposed as blocker from someone else who ran into this (app
On 09/27/2013 01:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 22:06 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
I do find the 'who's been
using computers longer?' competitions that seem to be ensuing on all
sorts of lists lately a bit tiresome :)
Why tiresome? It is a bit interesting. Way better t
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 22:06 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > >
> > That hasn't been the case for rather a long time.
> I've been around a long time... :-)
>
> The second computer I programmed (using FORTRAN IV) was an IBM 1130.
The point I was making is that it is not a current concern. Maybe
int
On 27/09/13 19:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 16:23 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
On 26/09/13 15:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 09/25/2013 06:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
My concern is wether this procedure results in a kernel that is
less optimized for the CPU it is running
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ - we
> agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console updating to
> work, and move the requ
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 15:43 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9wvQS9: line 2: fg: no job control
> error: %preun(cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package cronie
> error: cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64: erase failed
This kind of
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 16:23 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 26/09/13 15:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 09/25/2013 06:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> > > My concern is wether this procedure results in a kernel that is
> > > less optimized for the CPU it is running on than if Fedora had
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
