On 09/28/2013 10:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
At this point, 'yum install kdm konsole kcalc konqueror ksnapshot
kcm-gtk' only wants to install 198 packages, with konq apparently a part
of kde-baseapps instead of separate. Almost close enough for gummint
work. Kde-workspace wasn't pulled. Another 32
On 2013-09-28 20:28 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
That statement in conjunction with behavior I've observed seems to
indicate hard dependencies have been created for what on other distros
would be suggests. e.g., 'yum install konsole' results in 1 package plus
190 depend
On 09/28/2013 01:38 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
That statement in conjunction with behavior I've observed seems to
indicate hard dependencies have been created for what on other distros
would be suggests. e.g., 'yum install konsole' results in 1 package plus
190 dependent packages to be installed, amo
On 29/09/13 14:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
[...]
Soft deps could help with this, but the Fedora package management
folks have been opposed to them for a long time. They have some valid
reasons; personally I'm pro-soft deps, but it doesn't look like it'll
happen soon.
Maybe we should have semi-
On 29/09/13 14:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 20:49 -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
I suppose it's just me, then!
Life would not be worth living, if we all had exactly the same
interests! :-)
Viva la difference!
Che
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 04:38 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> That statement in conjunction with behavior I've observed seems to indicate
> hard dependencies have been created for what on other distros would be
> suggests. e.g., 'yum install konsole' results in 1 package plus 190 dependent
> packages
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
44
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19
9
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17121/vino-3.8.1-3.fc19
6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
162
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14005/zabbix-2.0.6-3.fc18
44
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 20:49 -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
> I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
I suppose it's just me, then!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net
http://www.happyassassin.net
Patrick O'Callaghan gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Gavin Flower
archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:How about:
> #fedora-ancient
>
>
> Not against the idea, but the name is problematic. People might think it's
about old versions of Fedora.
Even Red Hat Linux didn't exist un
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Gavin Flower <
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
> How about:
> #fedora-ancient
>
Not against the idea, but the name is problematic. People might think it's
about old versions of Fedora.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 29/09/13 10:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 28 September 2013 08:39, Clyde E. Kunkel
mailto:clydekunkel7...@verizon.net>> wrote:
On 09/27/2013 09:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
I agree. I find these di
On 28 September 2013 08:39, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 09:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
>>>
>>
>> They _really do_ keep coming up. What if we create a F
On 09/27/2013 09:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
They _really do_ keep coming up. What if we create a Fedora Old-Timers list
for this kind of discussion? I'm not even kidding
Compose started at Sat Sep 28 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
On 2013-09-27 19:33 (GMT-0600) Orion Poplawski composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
I'm not having any luck figuring out how Yum can be limited to
installing only hard dependencies when any given package is installed,
avoiding "nice to have" things that take time to install and update that
I'll never
16 matches
Mail list logo
