Rpm scriptlet testing is not expected to be automated in the near future
(though eventually it really ought to be). I can test the PRE and POST
scriptlets by a yum reinstall. PREUN and POSTUN are both harder to test, and
more insidious since bugs appear even when updating to a fixed version. The
F1
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17828/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc20
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17923/fedmsg-0.7.1-2.fc20
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17866
On 10/12/13 01:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/13 18:28, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>> You are probably correct in that it won't get much of my attention
>>> because there are thousands of things that need attention and my focus
>>> is necessarily primarily on the GTK backends
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
174
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17112/hplip-3.13.9-2.fc18
21
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17121/vino-3.8.1-3.fc19
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 00:02 +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Fedora SSD Cache is this sunday October 13th 2013. This Fedora Test
> Day will focus on bcache based SSD Caching in Fedora 20.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache
>
> If you're interested in tr
On 11.10.2013 22:48, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> The rpmfusion rpg keys will not install in Fedora 20 Beta TC2
> --
> All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
>
>
http://rpmfusion.org/ReportingBugs
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The rpmfusion rpg keys will not install in Fedora 20 Beta TC2
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I have this line in my logs (presented in red):
systemd-tmpfiles[215]: chmod(/var/log/journal) failed: Permission denied
Is it known bug or should I report it? I can't find any similar bug
report in bugzilla.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/11/13 18:28, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>> You are probably correct in that it won't get much of my attention
>> because there are thousands of things that need attention and my focus
>> is necessarily primarily on the GTK backends and GNOME3 integration.
>
> OK. I am p
On 10/11/2013 04:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, 'we' didn't, really. Josef just thought it would be a useful thing
to have, so he wrote it, and someone running a test day wound up using
it. There was no strategic meeting or grand conspiracy or plan or
something. This is how stuff happens in
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 16:07 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 03:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>
> > Is it a language comprehension issue or do you just deliberately
> > misrepresent what people say to match what you want to believe? That
> > response was asking if you had any
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 09:39 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:17 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Minor edits to the test case instructions (there's no longer an
> >> encrypt option in Installation Destination)
> >>
> >
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 09:28 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:24:06 -0600
> Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:52:28 +
> > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B.
On 10/11/2013 03:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Is it a language comprehension issue or do you just deliberately
misrepresent what people say to match what you want to believe? That
response was asking if you had any suggestions, not implying that no
research was done. I know you were here for th
On 10/11/2013 07:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
wiki instead of trying to (re)use something other dist
On 10/11/2013 09:36 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/11/13 18:28, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>> You are probably correct in that it won't get much of my attention
>> because there are thousands of things that need attention and my focus
>> is necessarily primarily on the GTK backends and GNOME3 integratio
On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:17 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Minor edits to the test case instructions (there's no longer an
>> encrypt option in Installation Destination)
>>
>>
>> 1. Boot the installer using any available means
>> 2.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:24:06 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:52:28 +
> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> > On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hmm when was it decided that we sho
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:52:28 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to
> >> replace the wiki instead of trying to
On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
wiki instead of trying to (re)use something other distribution are using?
Such as?
Exactly as I thought no
On 10/11/13 18:28, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> You are probably correct in that it won't get much of my attention
> because there are thousands of things that need attention and my focus
> is necessarily primarily on the GTK backends and GNOME3 integration.
OK. I am probably one of the few peopl
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:10 +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> На 11.10.2013 17:03, Adam Williamson написа:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
> >> wiki instead of trying to (re)use so
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:42:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Let's stop using wiki for test results
>
> Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
> wiki instead of trying to
На 11.10.2013 17:03, Adam Williamson написа:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
wiki instead of trying to (re)use something other distribution are using?
Such as?
Just for the record:
ht
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:42 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the
> wiki instead of trying to (re)use something other distribution are using?
Such as?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: Ad
On 10/11/2013 01:05 PM, Josef Skladanka wrote:
Hi,
first of all - thanks for the kind words!
I mailed the testday-owners during F19, I honestly forgot to promote it now (my
bad, I guess we could add it to some 'HOW TO' for testdays, if it exists).
The app still has it's limits (and I have not
Hi,
first of all - thanks for the kind words!
I mailed the testday-owners during F19, I honestly forgot to promote it now (my
bad, I guess we could add it to some 'HOW TO' for testdays, if it exists).
The app still has it's limits (and I have not yet found the time to work on it
since F19), b
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 08:21 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 07:55 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> > Folks,
> > I've participated both in Virtualization and GNOME test days this week and
> > there is one thing that felt very strange and not easy to use for me.
> >
> > GNOME test day resu
On 10/11/2013 07:55 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Folks,
> I've participated both in Virtualization and GNOME test days this week and
> there is one thing that felt very strange and not easy to use for me.
>
> GNOME test day results were recorded in the wiki, while Virtualization ones in
> a web
Compose started at Fri Oct 11 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Folks,
I've participated both in Virtualization and GNOME test days this week and there
is one thing that felt very strange and not easy to use for me.
GNOME test day results were recorded in the wiki, while Virtualization ones in a
web app here:
http://209.132.184.192/testdays/show_event?eve
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:17:04 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>
man localectl,
should help you out
"localectl list-x11-keymap-variants"
"locateectl list-keymaps"
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fed
On 10/11/2013 01:25 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 06:17 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi testers,
>>
>> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>>
>> With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
>> keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost a
On 10/11/2013 06:17 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>
> With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
> keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost after each reboot.
>
> Even a command like
>
> /sb
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 10:13 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/11/13 10:03, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 06:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been,
> >> introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora?
> > Have you filed a bu
On 10/11/2013 11:38 AM, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Friday 11 Oct 2013 11:17:04 Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi testers,
>>
>> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>>
>> With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
>> keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost af
On Friday 11 Oct 2013 11:17:04 Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>
> With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
> keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost after each reboot.
>
> Even a command like
>
>
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 11:17 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
>
> With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
> keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost after each reboot.
>
> Even a command like
>
Hi testers,
I'm running F20 with all updates applied.
With kernel-3.11.4-301.fc20.x86_64 having the problem that the german
keyboard layout, made by system-config-keyboard, is lost after each reboot.
Even a command like
/sbin/system-config-keyboard --noui de-latin1-nodeadkeys
in /etc/r
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 03:46 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> several times I started Fedora 20 with
> Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-20-Beta-TC2.iso via CD. When I later on start
> Windows XP the time displayed by Windows is changed by approximately 2
> hours. Is this already known or is it worthwhile to
Hi,
several times I started Fedora 20 with Fedora-Live-LXDE-i686-20-Beta-TC2.iso
via CD. When I later on start Windows XP the time displayed by Windows is
changed by approximately 2 hours. Is this already known or is it worthwhile to
write a bug?
Kind Regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteil
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:17 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Minor edits to the test case instructions (there's no longer an
> encrypt option in Installation Destination)
>
>
> 1. Boot the installer using any available means
> 2. At the Installation Destination screen, select at least two
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
