On 10/17/13 13:53, Joachim Backes wrote:
did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
virtualbox.org) VM?
My experience: The netinst iso is booted, but no progress (I don't see
any anaconda action, the screen remains black).
Going backup to VirtualBox-4.2 will install
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 17:10 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Mike Chambers m...@mtchambers.com wrote:
Tried your script but got an exit code, ugh can't remember it now.
That was my fault, sorry. The quoting was screwed up and an escape
character was
Compose started at Thu Oct 17 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
On 17/10/13 12:11 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:18:47PM -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
I have a similar usbmuxd problem in F20 Beta TC4. After installation,
during the first yum update I noticed a message about a usbmuxd
scriptlet error.
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit LXDE Live, and the 32- and
64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
Hi testers
Some months ago I installed F20 on some box. Because it runs stable, I
tried to migrate this F20 to another box. So I copied the filesystem(s)
of that F20 to the target machine, and after having conformed fstab,
grub2 bootloader and some other files to the target machine, I tried to
Joachim Backes joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de writes:
did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
virtualbox.org) VM?
Using VirtualBox-4.3, I've had no problems with testing any of the 20 Beta
TC5 32- or 64-bit install images (DVD or netinst), or with running my
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs
1. Says to install deltarpm.
2. yum install deltarpm says it's already installed.
3. applydeltaiso X Y Z
# bash: applydeltaiso: command not found…
So now what?
Chris Murphy--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 10/17/2013 06:13 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Joachim Backes joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de writes:
did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
virtualbox.org) VM?
Using VirtualBox-4.3, I've had no problems with testing any of the 20 Beta
TC5 32- or 64-bit
On 10/17/2013 11:15 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs
1. Says to install deltarpm.
2. yum install deltarpm says it's already installed.
3. applydeltaiso X Y Z
# bash: applydeltaiso: command not found…
So now what?
Chris Murphy
It says, In Fedora 12 or
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:25:56AM -0400, Frank wrote:
On 17/10/13 12:11 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
With yum-utils installed run, as root,
package-cleanup --noscripts --cleandupes
and that should do it.
I ran into this problem a few weeks ago - the advice I got at the
time (and
On 10/17/2013 05:39 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers
Some months ago I installed F20 on some box. Because it runs stable, I
tried to migrate this F20 to another box. So I copied the filesystem(s)
of that F20 to the target machine, and after having conformed fstab,
grub2 bootloader and some
On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:19 AM, nonamedotc nonamed...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 10/17/2013 11:15 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs
1. Says to install deltarpm.
2. yum install deltarpm says it's already installed.
3. applydeltaiso X Y Z
# bash:
Chris Murphy lists at colorremedies.com writes:
Oh nice, it's one of those days. Although I now sorta feel like gutting
that wiki page to remove all the ancient Fedora clutter.
The thing is, there's always someone using an incredibly old version of
Fedora, or any version of RHEL/CentOS, and
On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:39 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers
Some months ago I installed F20 on some box. Because it runs stable, I
tried to migrate this F20 to another box. So I copied the filesystem(s)
of that F20
Frank beacon at videotron.ca writes:
First (as superuser root) try out the
package-cleanup --cleandupes
command. If that doesn't manage to remove the duplicate, give
rpm --erase --justdb --noscripts --notriggers usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc20.x86_64
a try.
You want to remove the old
On 10/17/2013 11:35 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Oh nice, it's one of those days. Although I now sorta feel like
gutting that wiki page to remove all the ancient Fedora clutter.
Chris Murphy
It might be best to change the order, perhaps? The sentence for Fedora
11 could be below the current
First TC5 attempt from netinst selecting
Fedora-20-Beta-TC5-x86_64-DVD.iso disk image:
Selected creative and dev workstation. No mingw option. No
scientific-engineering option.
Can not config user without password. Install failed to recognize
Korora on HD.
Once booted, can't install wine
#407: Bluetooth Test Day
---+---
Reporter: martix| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:|
On 10/14/2013 04:59 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
nas:/backup /mnt/backup nfs bg,user,_netdev 0 0
Okay, so the bg option is a little different from what most people
refer to as automounting, in that it just repeatedly attempts to mount
the share until it succeeds, whereas
I'm getting something of a regression with kernel 3.11.5-300 today that doesn't
happen with 3.11.4 but I don't know what's instigating it. The result is Gnome
freezes, including the mouse arrow. Capslock works, and I still have access via
ssh. I get a bunch of kernel messages, it starts with
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 16:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm getting something of a regression with kernel 3.11.5-300 today that
doesn't happen with 3.11.4 but I don't know what's instigating it. The result
is Gnome freezes, including the mouse arrow. Capslock works, and I still have
access
On Qui, 2013-10-17 at 16:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm getting something of a regression with kernel 3.11.5-300 today that
doesn't happen with 3.11.4 but I don't know what's instigating it. The result
is Gnome freezes, including the mouse arrow. Capslock works, and I still have
access
On Oct 18, 2013 1:20 AM, nonamedotc nonamed...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
After all, how many people are going to be using F11 now? :)
nonamedotc.
That's not a problem, I still use FC3.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 10/17/2013 07:33 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Oct 18, 2013 1:20 AM, nonamedotc nonamed...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:nonamed...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
After all, how many people are going to be using F11 now? :)
nonamedotc.
That's not a problem, I still use FC3.
Oops! My
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mike Chambers m...@mtchambers.com wrote:
With the fix above, the really wait script now works. Rebooted twice to
be sure and the nfs dir got mounted both times as it should. Thanks for
that :)
So it is nm-online that is saying it's online when really it's
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, now it's failing to mount on boot:
snip output
Did you change anything yet? That kind of looks like the same exact
bug Mike is running into.
But bg mounts are supposed to keep trying to mount in a loop, and
automounts
Wanting to test fedup-cli from 19--20 and if the switch away from kdm works,
but I'm getting...
No upgrade available for the following repos: fedora-chromium-stable
getting boot images...
Downloading failed: couldn't get boot images: HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
I think I may need to add
On Sex, 2013-10-18 at 11:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wanting to test fedup-cli from 19--20 and if the switch away from kdm works,
but I'm getting...
No upgrade available for the following repos: fedora-chromium-stable
getting boot images...
Downloading failed: couldn't get boot images:
On 10/18/13 11:49, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sex, 2013-10-18 at 11:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Wanting to test fedup-cli from 19--20 and if the switch away from kdm
works, but I'm getting...
No upgrade available for the following repos: fedora-chromium-stable
getting boot images...
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:18 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mike Chambers m...@mtchambers.com wrote:
With the fix above, the really wait script now works. Rebooted twice to
be sure and the nfs dir got mounted both times as it should. Thanks for
that :)
On 10/17/2013 09:17 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 10/17/2013 06:13 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Joachim Backes joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de writes:
did anybody try to install F20-Beta-TC... in a VirtualBox-4.3 (from
virtualbox.org) VM?
Using VirtualBox-4.3, I've had no problems with testing
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit LXDE Live, and the 32- and
64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
33 matches
Mail list logo
