Hi,
first test with
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-RC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-KDE-i686-20-Beta-2.iso
uploaded on the 1st of November. I didn't install F20, only test with running
Live CD, without installation.
The problem with changing the system clock permanently to UTC see
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
196
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
42
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18
39
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
79
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19
35
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17836/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc19
22
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
Beta RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-cbaaf3a2 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-17abf27e : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
htt
NOTE: The 20 Beta RC1 compose was skipped. The last tested compose was TC6.
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
chan
I think that some of the problem is that you have to register to file a
bug. There is no reason to register if you just want the developer to know
there is a bug and from then on no interaction unless needed.
I understand why there is a need to be able to contact the reporter and ask
for more info,
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:12:32 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> On 11/01/2013 10:03 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > recently OpenSource.com published an article of mine explaining why
> > users should take the extra step to submit a bug:
> > http://opensource.com/business/1
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:03:51 +0200
Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
> recently OpenSource.com published an article of mine explaining why
> users should take the extra step to submit a bug:
> http://opensource.com/business/13/10/user-guide-bugs-open-source-projects
>
>
> It is based on real
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:51:24 +0200
Alexander Todorov wrote:
> На 1.11.2013 12:12, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" написа:
>
> > There is nothing in that area that is not already known or trying
> > to be addressed.
> >
>
> I'm not aware of how are we trying to address this, can you point me
> to some
Compose started at Fri Nov 1 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
На 1.11.2013 12:12, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" написа:
There is nothing in that area that is not already known or trying to be
addressed.
I'm not aware of how are we trying to address this, can you point me to some
wiki pages, proposals, etc?
--
Alex
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorap
On 11/01/2013 10:03 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
Hi folks,
recently OpenSource.com published an article of mine explaining why
users should take the extra step to submit a bug:
http://opensource.com/business/13/10/user-guide-bugs-open-source-projects
It is based on real event, which happened
Hi folks,
recently OpenSource.com published an article of mine explaining why users should
take the extra step to submit a bug:
http://opensource.com/business/13/10/user-guide-bugs-open-source-projects
It is based on real event, which happened to me during Fedora test days last
month. The com
13 matches
Mail list logo
