Re: Switch back to KDM?

2013-12-07 Thread Christopher Meng
Yes, I think it's still in embryonic stage. It's not easy to replace KDM ;) https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/192481.html -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Switch back to KDM?

2013-12-07 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/08/13 12:05, Christopher Meng wrote: > Target to f21: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM Thanks I thought the target was F20 since it was in all the previous test releases. I guess this is a good explanation SDDM is now lacking some functionality compared

Re: Switch back to KDM?

2013-12-07 Thread Christopher Meng
Target to f21: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Switch back to KDM?

2013-12-07 Thread Ed Greshko
I've just now realized that with TC5 sddm has been dropped in favor of kdm. What was the reason for switching back? -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: slow mirror workaround?

2013-12-07 Thread Frank
On 07/12/13 08:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-04-23 04:43 (GMT-0500) Kamil Paral composed: Trying to yum upgrade 19 is stuck on a mirror with no useful throughput. What kind of workaround for this is available? Nothing jumps at me in the yum man page. How do I specify to use a particular mir

Re: slow mirror workaround?

2013-12-07 Thread Felix Miata
On 2013-04-23 04:43 (GMT-0500) Kamil Paral composed: Trying to yum upgrade 19 is stuck on a mirror with no useful throughput. What kind of workaround for this is available? Nothing jumps at me in the yum man page. How do I specify to use a particular mirror know to work? If the speed is below

Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease u

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2013-12-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19198/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc20 43 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19934/openstack-glance-2013.2-2.fc20 38 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR

Is yum groups broken in f20 ?

2013-12-07 Thread piruthiviraj natarajan
I tried updating today. Yum is working. But I get weird warning about the groups. yum update -y updates-testing/20/x86_64/metalink | 7.2 kB 00:00 Warning: group core does not exist. Warning: group multimedia does not exist. Warning: group input-methods does not exist. Warning:

F-20 Branched report: 20131207 changes

2013-12-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Dec 7 07:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman] blueman-1.23-7

Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?

2013-12-07 Thread Joachim Backes
On 12/07/2013 12:01 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 12/07/2013 11:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:37:08 +0100, Simon G. wrote: >> >>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039052 >>> and >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.4.3-120.fc20?_csrf_token=88

Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?

2013-12-07 Thread Joachim Backes
On 12/07/2013 11:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:37:08 +0100, Simon G. wrote: > >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039052 >> and >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.4.3-120.fc20?_csrf_token=88c0eb78b5fd4d9eb03e957cc9042ad6c25c3f7c >> > > The e

Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?

2013-12-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:37:08 +0100, Simon G. wrote: > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039052 > and > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.4.3-120.fc20?_csrf_token=88c0eb78b5fd4d9eb03e957cc9042ad6c25c3f7c > The explanation of what exactly was broken with the -119.fc20 yu

Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-07 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night > (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). > > However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users > will see an error about the p

Re: New test case: SMB browsing

2013-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 08:07 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 12/06/2013 11:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few > > days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases. > > Here's the first: > > > > Though

Re: New test case: SMB browsing

2013-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 03:18 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > What would make sense would be to write a separate test for smb4k. Or, > > heck, a whole set of test cases! We've been wanting to have more test > > cases for more applications for a long time. But it wouldn't make sense > > as a 'desktop

Re: New test case: SMB browsing

2013-12-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 11:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases. Here's the first: Thoughts, queries, corrections, improvements etc? Thanks! As long as you dont start putt