Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

2013-12-12 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On fös 13.des 2013 06:30, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 05:31 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On fös 13.des 2013 02:05, Adam Williamson wrote: It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not consider this release criterion applicable/desired: "All applica

Re: yum rawhide failing....

2013-12-12 Thread poma
On 13.12.2013 03:02, Kevin Martin wrote: > Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not > found messages. I see this error as well: > > One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental > packages for the next Fedora release), > and yum doe

Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 05:31 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On fös 13.des 2013 02:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not > > consider this release criterion applicable/desired: > > > > "All applications that can be launched using the

Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 05:38 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On fös 13.des 2013 04:06, Adam Williamson wrote: > > it was -1'ed at go/no-go meeting in about five seconds. No-one voted +1 > > blocker on it. > > For the first I was not present there since I arrived later then usual > due to $

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: In previous Fedora versions one could switch to a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. Alt-F1 or some such would return to the X-Windows. It is apparently no longer possible to return to X. Workaround: Install Nvidia driver from rpmfusion

Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

2013-12-12 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On fös 13.des 2013 02:05, Adam Williamson wrote: It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not consider this release criterion applicable/desired: "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default insta

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

2013-12-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 237 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 83 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 77 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Felix Miata
On 2013-12-12 19:36 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed: On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 22:05 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: On host kt880, kdm-4.11.3-5.fc20.i686 login manager isn't starting even though graphical.target is default and I put 5 on cmdline. Startx gets KDE going, but on whatever tty I logged

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 22:05 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2013-12-12 18:13 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed: > > > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 17:07 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > > >> In previous Fedora versions one could switch to > >> a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. > >> Alt-F

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Felix Miata
On 2013-12-12 18:13 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed: On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 17:07 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: In previous Fedora versions one could switch to a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. Alt-F1 or some such would return to the X-Windows. It is apparently no longer po

Re: yum rawhide failing....

2013-12-12 Thread David
On 12/12/2013 9:02 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not > found messages. I see this error as well: > > One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental > packages for the next Fedora release), > and yum d

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 17:07 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > In previous Fedora versions one could switch to > a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. > Alt-F1 or some such would return to the X-Windows. > It is apparently no longer possible to return to X. > > Workaround: Install Nvidia

Re: RC1 and UEFI

2013-12-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 12, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > Could you be more specific about what information you need > and how I might get this information? On Dec 5th in thread "Re: TC5 at Caddyshack" I replied to all, and asked you for roughly 8 pieces of information related to assertions

Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not consider this release criterion applicable/desired: "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and

yum rawhide failing....

2013-12-12 Thread Kevin Martin
Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not found messages. I see this error as well: One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. Is there a

Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 17:07 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > In previous Fedora versions one could switch to > a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. > Alt-F1 or some such would return to the X-Windows. > It is apparently no longer possible to return to X. > > Workaround: Install Nvidia

RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken

2013-12-12 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
In previous Fedora versions one could switch to a console tty with Ctrl-Alt F2 or whatever. Alt-F1 or some such would return to the X-Windows. It is apparently no longer possible to return to X. Workaround: Install Nvidia driver from rpmfusion then Ctrl-Alt-F1 works as usual. -- Chuck Fors

Re: RC1 and UEFI

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:49 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > Could you be more specific about what information you need > and how I might get this information? In your initial description you wrote "Anaconda cannot modify the hard drive when booted UEFI." This is a somewhat odd description, a

Re: RC1 and UEFI

2013-12-12 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
Could you be more specific about what information you need and how I might get this information? On 12/12/2013 02:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 08:32 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: UEFI situation with 64 bit netinst is apparently unchanged. Still can't write to the ha

Re: RC1 and UEFI

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 08:32 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > UEFI situation with 64 bit netinst is apparently unchanged. > Still can't write to the hard drive. I did such an install. Worked fine. You tend to hit a problem, pull out two of the five hundred potential factors in play for any giv

Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?

2013-12-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Adam Pribyl wrote: What happens if yum downloads again the groups info? BTW: I only have two 4bytes long file in this directory, and have the same problem. The files in the directory are created by yum and are not downloaded from a repository. Removing the files will stop yum from using the gr

Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Adam Pribyl wrote: There is much more problems with groups in bugzilla, it affects F19 too. You can "fix" this by using "yum mark remove " on all groups you get a warning they are missing (you have to have the latest yum - so yum update yum).

Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?

2013-12-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Adam Pribyl wrote: There is much more problems with groups in bugzilla, it affects F19 too. You can "fix" this by using "yum mark remove " on all groups you get a warning they are missing (you have to have the latest yum - so yum update yum). You don't need to bother with this. If you read the

Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?

2013-12-12 Thread Adam Pribyl
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 12/08/2013 08:37 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: Curious, why it blew up right now, just before F20 is released. It should have happened in alpha and not now. Workaround is to yum group mark remove for every group on the list. What a waste of

RE: Not able to install F20 over IPv6

2013-12-12 Thread Dan Mossor
> Subject: Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6 > From: awill...@redhat.com > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:34:19 -0800 > > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:10 +0100, A.J. Werkman wrote: > > On 12/09/2013 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:08:51 +010

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013-12-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:03:38 -0500 Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On 12/12/2013 02:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit. > > > > As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release > > Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content > > inf

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013-12-12 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 12/12/2013 02:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/t

RC1 and UEFI

2013-12-12 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
UEFI situation with 64 bit netinst is apparently unchanged. Still can't write to the hard drive. Install without UEFI was nominal. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Relia

rawhide report: 20131212 changes

2013-12-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Dec 12 08:11:11 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc2

F-20 Branched report: 20131212 changes

2013-12-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Dec 12 08:16:58 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman] blueman-1.23-7

Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs

2013-12-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Final RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at ami-3b361952 : us-east-1 image for i386 ami-1337187a : us-east-1 image for x86_64 additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files in the release tree ht

en_US MC: bad chars on ttys

2013-12-12 Thread Felix Miata
Am I the only one seeing this? I've not found a bug on the MC tracker, or looked in RedHat Bugzilla. Problem: line draw characters are not being used where they should be. Pane borders are ugly. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21

Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #5

2013-12-12 Thread Kamil Paral
Meeting minutes: == #fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review == Meeting started by kparal at 17:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-12-11/f20-blocke