On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 00:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah I'm holding off on a major f bomb email until I understand what
> >> happened and exactly when this broke. If y
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 07:31 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, then there's th
On Dec 13, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Yeah I'm holding off on a major f bomb email until I understand what
>> happened and exactly when this broke. If you have some insight on that
>> to save me regression testing, tha
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 00:06 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>> It is still very large, that's probably the f
On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> It is still very large, that's probably the first thing you'd notice
>>> about it.
>>
>> I counted, for fun: even
On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> It is still very large, that's probably the first thing you'd notice
>> about it.
>
> I counted, for fun: even excluding the 'sanity checks', it contains 101
> tests.
In my op
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria
>> that say
>>
On 12/13/2013 05:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
restarting the system -
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It is still very large, that's probably the first thing you'd notice
> about it.
I counted, for fun: even excluding the 'sanity checks', it contains 101
tests.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fe
Hi, folks. So, our current set of storage validation tests is just a
grab-bag of stuff we've held over from oldui, added and patched
piecemeal; it's not very coherent or consistent and it doesn't come
close to exercising all of the storage stuff in the installer. We wind
up sort of inventing test p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:46:16 -0500
Matthew Miller escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
> > > files in the release tree
> > > http://dl.fedor
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19198/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc20
49
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19934/openstack-glance-2013.2-2.fc20
44
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
On 14/12/13 12:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria
that say
"we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we
don't.
That is true however the
Hey folks - just a quick note, I've created the F21 and F22 blocker/FE
tracker bugs and updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers . The
F21 tracker bugs have the 'non-versioned' aliases (AlphaBlocker,
BetaBlocker etc etc) now, so you can propose F21 blocker/FEs easily.
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria
> that say
> "we really stand behind the package s
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives
> > it a certain sense of importanc
Hi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria that say
> "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we
> don't.
>
That is true however the solution is not to weaken the release criteria b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 06:02 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>
> On 12/13/2013 02:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 02:02 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2013 04:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16
On 12/13/2013 02:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 02:02 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 12/12/2013 04:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:49 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Could you be more specific about what information you need
and how I mi
On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives
> it a certain sense of importance, so I thought I'd best get it done now.
>
> I wrote
> https:/
On Dec 13, 2013 3:12 AM, "poma" wrote:
>
> On 13.12.2013 11:02, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>
> > Please provide the name of a command that sends the required
> > files to Red Hat when this happens.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_installation_problems :)
> BTW don't hesitate to a
I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives
it a certain sense of importance, so I thought I'd best get it done now.
I wrote
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_lvmthinp_rootfs ,
and
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > As I've said, if people are willing to actually go out and do that, then
> > fine. Does desktop team actively curate the DVD-installed package set?
> > And to play the counte
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As I've said, if people are willing to actually go out and do that, then
> fine. Does desktop team actively curate the DVD-installed package set?
> And to play the counter-factual game: imagine there had been a bug
> analogous to https://
Hi, folks. I wanted to draw the attention of anyone who used Fedora 20
pre-release (Alpha, Beta, or TC/RC for Alpha, Beta or Final) to this
issue:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#.2Froot_permissions_incorrect_on_pre-release_installations
Briefly, if you did use F20 pre-release - th
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:36 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not
> > consider this release criterion applicable/desired:
> >
> > "All applications that can be launched using the standard
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does not
> consider this release criterion applicable/desired:
>
> "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
> mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a
On 13.12.2013 16:17, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> "yum clean" without any additional options could be the default.
>
> Btw, from time to time I kill everything below /var/lib/yum to get rid
> of old history/yumdb files I don't find relevant anymore.
Sí jefe!
All right!
Have a nice weekend!
poma
On 12/13/2013 09:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:52:58 +0100, poma wrote:
>
>>> Prefer "yum clean metadata" (or just "yum clean expire-cache") over
>>> deleting even downloaded/cached packages with "all".
>>
>> SÃ jefe, pero "todos" es tan hermosa. ;)
>
> "yum clean" with
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> The DVD is releng/fesco responsibility, they dictate and decide
> what's on it and what not and how it's delivered not the
> sub-community's.
Really?
The KDE SIG has full access to change what gets installed when you
install from the DVD. If
On 12/13/2013 10:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
restarting the system -
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
> > I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
> > sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
> > restarting the system - this does not affect the behavio
On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
restarting the system - this does not affect the behavior in any way.
Is anyone else seeing this?
Yes, I am. Both under F19 a
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
> > files in the release tree
> > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-RC1/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-AMI
> > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stag
2013/12/13 nonamedotc
> On 12/13/2013 09:02 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any netinstall image for this RC1?
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Michal
>>
>> http://eventhorizon.pl/
>>
>>
>>
>
> Yes. There is
>
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-RC1.1/Fedora/x86_64/iso
On 12/13/2013 09:02 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Is there any netinstall image for this RC1?
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
Yes. There is
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-RC1.1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/
Download this image from the link above - Fedora-20-x86_64
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:52:58 +0100, poma wrote:
> > Prefer "yum clean metadata" (or just "yum clean expire-cache") over
> > deleting even downloaded/cached packages with "all".
>
> Sí jefe, pero "todos" es tan hermosa. ;)
"yum clean" without any additional options could be the default.
Btw, fro
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
restarting the system - this does not affect the behavior in any way.
Is anyone else seeing this?
How can I troubleshoot this and what information should I provide fo
Hi,
Is there any netinstall image for this RC1?
2013/12/12 Andre Robatino
> NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
>
> As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
> (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
> changes, can be foun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:05:55 -0600
Dennis Gilmore escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Final RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
>
> ami-3b361952 : us-east-1 image for i386
> ami-1337187
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 05:54 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 03:20 AM, poma wrote:
> > On 13.12.2013 08:25, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >
> >> >I argue that we should get rid of the DVD it's an era of the past and
> >> >just provide net-install iso and lives.
> > Probably there ar
On 12/13/2013 04:24 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 03:20 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 13.12.2013 08:25, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>>> >I argue that we should get rid of the DVD it's an era of the past and
>>> >just provide net-install iso and lives.
>> Probably there are good reasons w
On 12/13/2013 12:55 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> On fös 13.des 2013 06:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 05:31 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On fös 13.des 2013 02:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
It was clear at the Go/No-Go meeting today that KDE SIG does no
Compose started at Fri Dec 13 07:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
On 12/13/2013 03:20 AM, poma wrote:
On 13.12.2013 08:25, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>I argue that we should get rid of the DVD it's an era of the past and
>just provide net-install iso and lives.
Probably there are good reasons why the DVD is still here.
Indeed! There are environments/sit
On 13.12.2013 11:43, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Prefer "yum clean metadata" (or just "yum clean expire-cache") over
> deleting even downloaded/cached packages with "all".
Sí jefe, pero "todos" es tan hermosa. ;)
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://ad
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 02:02 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 04:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:49 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> >> Could you be more specific about what information you need
> >> and how I might get this information?
> > In your
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:36:41 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 13.12.2013 03:02, Kevin Martin wrote:
> > Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not
> > found messages. I see this error as well:
> >
> > One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Development
On 13.12.2013 11:02, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Please provide the name of a command that sends the required
> files to Red Hat when this happens.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_installation_problems :)
BTW don't hesitate to ask directly on
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On 12/12/2013 04:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:49 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Could you be more specific about what information you need
and how I might get this information?
In your initial description you wrote "Anaconda cannot modify
the hard drive when boote
On 13.12.2013 08:25, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I argue that we should get rid of the DVD it's an era of the past and
> just provide net-install iso and lives.
Probably there are good reasons why the DVD is still here.
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
At the Fedora 20 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 20 by Fedora QA and Fedora Development.
Fedora Release Engineering to be notified.
"#agreed Fedora QA and Fedora Development are both Go; Fedora Release
Engineering to be notified (with possibility to r
52 matches
Mail list logo
