Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread poma
On 27.02.2014 20:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > I have similar feelings as ajax. It's not whether it's useless of treasure. > If someone says "give me commit rights as I want to make tests build|fix > url|fix formatting|improve BRs|etc. in package A you're maintainer" I would > be more than h

Re: XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl

2014-02-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Fedora is considering XFS as their default file system. They support >> three primary architectures: x86_64, i686, and armv7hl. Do XFS devs >> have any reservations about XFS as a default

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "poma" > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:57:34 PM > Subject: Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check > > On 27.02.2014 18:46, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 1

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 11:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 11:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 06:02 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > > On 02/26/2014 04:39 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > > > Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 11:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 06:02 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > On 02/26/2014 04:39 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > > Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in > > > update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 06:02 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > On 02/26/2014 04:39 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in > > update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact that is does not work. I > > have done a lot of searching to fin

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread poma
On 27.02.2014 18:46, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 17:50 +0100, poma wrote: >> On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote: >>> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: >> ... Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to http://cgit.freedesktop.org/

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/ > > Oh yes, another useless rpm feature, I'll be sure to make that my top > priority. sneer at it if you wish, but this is a feature of RPM

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 17:50 +0100, poma wrote: > On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: > ... > >> Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/ > > > > Oh yes, anoth

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread poma
Does your "brick" works with N.U.T.? poma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/27/2014 08:02 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > On 02/26/2014 04:39 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >> Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in >> update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact that is does not work. I >>

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread poma
On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: ... >> Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/ > > Oh yes, another useless rpm feature, I'll be sure to make that my top > pr

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: > Adam, > just for completeness - libpciaccess doesn't seem to have a test suite. Do > you > mean to exclude it from the effort of creating one as well, or only exclude > reports for missing %check? The latter. > Btw the URL field in

Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites

2014-02-27 Thread Christopher Meng
Interesting : fedora-release-notes ***-fonts Can someone point me how to test them? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Rawhide install: script error Java install

2014-02-27 Thread poma
On 27.02.2014 14:41, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.5.0.6.pre02.fc21 should fix this. This > build is in progress now, so it won't be in today's rawhide, but should > be in tomorrow's. You can also grab it directly from koji once it > finishes building. > http://koji.fed

Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites

2014-02-27 Thread Alexander Todorov
На 27.02.2014 16:18, Richard W.M. Jones написа: Attached is a proposed patch to the spec file. I ran this under auto-buildrequires to see if it would need any extra BRs, but auto-br didn't find any. Richard, can you point me to what auto-buildrequires is, where it lives and how do I use it?

Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check

2014-02-27 Thread Alexander Todorov
На 26.02.2014 17:19, Adam Jackson написа: On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Except the kernel. Please exclude it from all of this. Also: xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-drv-*, libdrm, libpciaccess, mesa. Any reasonable amount of testing on those is going to require more hardwar

Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites

2014-02-27 Thread Alexander Todorov
Hi folks, thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki pages about packages which don't execute their tests in %check: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testing_in_check and another one for packages which don't seem to have test suites at all: https://fedoraproject.org/w

Re: Rawhide install: script error Java install

2014-02-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:33:00 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: On 02/25/2014 02:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 18:06 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: For the last few days rawhide pxeboot installs have crashed with a script error java-1.7.0-openjdk Is there a

Re: Apcupsd 3.14.11-1 in update-testing

2014-02-27 Thread Lawrence E Graves
On 02/26/2014 04:39 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: Is anyone aware of the fact that the apcupsd* packages have been in update-testing for about 4 weeks and the fact that is does not work. I have done a lot of searching to find out if there is a fix and there is none or should I say I didn't find

Re: Rawhide install: script error Java install

2014-02-27 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
On 02/25/2014 02:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 18:06 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: For the last few days rawhide pxeboot installs have crashed with a script error java-1.7.0-openjdk Is there a way to bypass this file when installing rawhide with a reasonable desktop

Re: /var/log/messages is scrambled!

2014-02-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/27/2014 08:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:25 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/27/2014 08:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker