On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Im working towards making anaconda installs the preferred install
> method, which on some hardware today it already is.
OK good to know. This reinforces my thinking. Is it sane for ARMv7 to have its
own fs default? Or should all of the archs
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:20 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-03/fedora-qa.2014-03-03-16.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
Can folks with F19 boxes available please test and karma the F19
incarnation of the gnutls security fix?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19
As I'm sure most of you have seen by now, this is the fix for a
significant and very high-profile security vuln, s
Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this bug?
Jonathan Calloway
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Can folks with F19 boxes available please test and karma the F19
> incarnation of the gnutls security fix?
>
> https://
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
75
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23636/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-2.fc20
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24018/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc20
48
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
130
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
48
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this
> bug?
>
> Jonathan Calloway
Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I
don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has
On 03/05/14 15:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this
>> bug?
>>
>> Jonathan Calloway
> Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I
> don't know