The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
203
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
24
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5497/openstack-keystone-2013.2.3-3.fc20
15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:58 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 09:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of
> > Taskotron 0.1!
> >
> > This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet
> > to the point where AutoQA can be repla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2014 09:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of
> Taskotron 0.1!
>
> This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet
> to the point where AutoQA can be replaced, each new release
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2014-05-19
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Now that Taskotron 0.1 has been released, it's time to start planning
for 0.2 so let's do a meeting right after the Fedora QA meet
The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of Taskotron
0.1!
This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet to
the point where AutoQA can be replaced, each new release will bring us
closer to reaching that initial goal. The current plan is to move
towards a time-
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
> I have no idea if the package could be fixed to not do this, I'm not
> sure what that reconf does. You might open an R bug on it...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098663
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https:/
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:13:45 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC)
> > Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5
> > > mismatch" error. Is this a k
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan
> >
> > for one of the new feature in 389.
> > I want to add
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan
>
> for one of the new feature in 389.
> I want to add it to upstream test plans, but I am not sure where it
> should go exactl
On May 16, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 05/15/2014 11:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On May 15, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
This happens on both F20 and Rawhide with separately mounted /var.
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC)
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch"
> > error. Is this a known problem?
>
> Can you pastebin the full output?
I shut down the guest, so
On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
> In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch"
> error. Is this a known problem?
Can you pastebin the full output?
Usually this is due to something in your installed package not matching
the rpmdb, so it fa
On 05/15/2014 11:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On May 15, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> This happens on both F20 and Rawhide with separately mounted /var.
>>>
>>> [2.839950] f20v.localdomain systemd[1]: Mounting /var...
e.g.
libreoffice-4.2.4.2-13.fc21
- armv7hl
Started Thu, 15 May 2014 11:57:09 UTC
Completed Fri, 16 May 2014 03:29:26 UTC
- x86_64
Started Thu, 15 May 2014 11:57:11 UTC
Completed Thu, 15 May 2014 17:46:09 UTC
Whence comes this splendid speed?
poma
--
test mailing li
In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch"
error. Is this a known problem?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
202
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
17 matches
Mail list logo