Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-05-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 203 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-05-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 24 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5497/openstack-keystone-2013.2.3-3.fc20 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2

Re: Taskotron Webpage Security Certificate Issue

2014-05-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:58 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote: > On 05/16/2014 09:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > > The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of > > Taskotron 0.1! > > > > This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet > > to the point where AutoQA can be repla

Taskotron Webpage Security Certificate Issue

2014-05-16 Thread Bob Lightfoot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/16/2014 09:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of > Taskotron 0.1! > > This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet > to the point where AutoQA can be replaced, each new release

2014-05-19 @ Fedora QA Devel Meeting

2014-05-16 Thread Tim Flink
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2014-05-19 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Now that Taskotron 0.1 has been released, it's time to start planning for 0.2 so let's do a meeting right after the Fedora QA meet

Taskotron 0.1 Released

2014-05-16 Thread Tim Flink
The Fedora QA devel team is proud to announce the release of Taskotron 0.1! This is the first of many releases to come. While we are not yet to the point where AutoQA can be replaced, each new release will bring us closer to reaching that initial goal. The current plan is to move towards a time-

Re: rawhide R-core drpm

2014-05-16 Thread Andre Robatino
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: > I have no idea if the package could be fixed to not do this, I'm not > sure what that reconf does. You might open an R bug on it... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098663 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https:/

Re: rawhide R-core drpm "md5 mismatch" error

2014-05-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:13:45 + (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: > > > On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC) > > Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 > > > mismatch" error. Is this a k

Re: Test Plan location for 389

2014-05-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have created > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan > > > > for one of the new feature in 389. > > I want to add

Re: Test Plan location for 389

2014-05-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I have created > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan > > for one of the new feature in 389. > I want to add it to upstream test plans, but I am not sure where it > should go exactl

Re: /var to mount over is not empty

2014-05-16 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 16, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 05/15/2014 11:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On May 15, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: This happens on both F20 and Rawhide with separately mounted /var.

Re: rawhide R-core drpm "md5 mismatch" error

2014-05-16 Thread Andre Robatino
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes: > On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC) > Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch" > > error. Is this a known problem? > > Can you pastebin the full output? I shut down the guest, so

Re: rawhide R-core drpm "md5 mismatch" error

2014-05-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:45:33 + (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch" > error. Is this a known problem? Can you pastebin the full output? Usually this is due to something in your installed package not matching the rpmdb, so it fa

Re: /var to mount over is not empty

2014-05-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 05/15/2014 11:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On May 15, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> This happens on both F20 and Rawhide with separately mounted /var. >>> >>> [2.839950] f20v.localdomain systemd[1]: Mounting /var...

armv7hl build time

2014-05-16 Thread poma
e.g. libreoffice-4.2.4.2-13.fc21 - armv7hl Started Thu, 15 May 2014 11:57:09 UTC Completed Fri, 16 May 2014 03:29:26 UTC - x86_64 Started Thu, 15 May 2014 11:57:11 UTC Completed Thu, 15 May 2014 17:46:09 UTC Whence comes this splendid speed? poma -- test mailing li

rawhide R-core drpm "md5 mismatch" error

2014-05-16 Thread Andre Robatino
In rawhide, R-core drpms always fail to rebuild with an "md5 mismatch" error. Is this a known problem? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-05-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 202 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20