$ fedpkg switch-branch f21
Could not execute switch_branch: len([]) != len(['PRIV_END: seteuid:
Function not implemented', '', '', 'and the repository exists.'])
ERROR:rpkg:Could not execute switch_branch: len([]) != len(['PRIV_END:
seteuid: Function not implemented', '', '', 'and the repository
ex
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
264
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
76 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
After updating glibc this morning setuid stuff broken (openssh and cron
were affected). Downgrading made it work again. I might have needed to
reboot (though that would be unusual), but I didn't want to risk it
as I am testing some other stuff and didn't want to have to do a recovery
before get
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 10:41 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I've switched some of my machines to Fedora 21, it occured to me when
> doing package reviews that there is no Mock configuration yet for F21 --
> leaving me with the alternative of doing a local mock build for F20 a
On 16.07.2014 21:07, poma wrote:
On 16.07.2014 18:47, poma wrote:
On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283
Has anyone run into something like this, so far?
poma
When installed as part of the
On 16.07.2014 18:47, poma wrote:
On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283
Has anyone run into something like this, so far?
poma
When installed as part of the Creative+Development system,
KDE g
On 07/16/2014 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
>
> I assume this is not planned nor correct (since my yum cache is much
> smaller) but can't seem to clear it out with any of the dnf
> commands. Â How can I clear this up
Hi
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> I assume this is not planned nor correct (since my yum cache is much
> smaller) but can't seem to clear it out with any of the dnf
> commands. How can I clear this up gracefully?
>
This should really be reported as a bug against dnf.
Below is the meeting minutes from today's Blocker Review Meeting. The
next meeting will be held at 16:00 UTC on Wednesday, 2014-07-23.
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:5
So my dnf cache for rawhide is over 4Gb in size and it appears that there are
duplicate files in
/var/cache/dnf/x86_64/rawhide/rawhide/packages (duplicate in that multiple
versions of rpm's exist in the directory), for example:
PackageKit-0.9.2-5.fc21.x86_64.rpm
PackageKit-0.9.2-7.fc21.x86_64.rp
On 16.07.2014 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283
Has anyone run into something like this, so far?
poma
When installed as part of the Creative+Development system,
KDE gets wedged right after it displays
On 07/16/2014 09:10 AM, poma wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283
Has anyone run into something like this, so far?
poma
When installed as part of the Creative+Development system,
KDE gets wedged right after it displays the disk icon.
Often Gnome doesn't work either --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120283
Has anyone run into something like this, so far?
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 15.07.2014 18:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:27:07 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
The images directory has been missing from the Fedora 21
mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os
for quite a while.
Yeah, it's been failing to compose.
As we get to alpha c
On 15.07.2014 22:58, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:58:54 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 19:50:59 +0200,
poma wrote:
After 21 gets released, due to the use of 'updates-testing', do we
need to yum --release
15 matches
Mail list logo
