On Jul 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:01:29 -0500
> Dan Mossor wrote:
>
>> The guys in #releng told me the slow downloads were my issue. I'm
>> glad it's not just me - I can't offer much beyond confirmation that
>> there is a problem with koji.
>
> There re
Recent yum updates to my omen.com server have resulted in an unstable
system.
At first the problem appeared to be related to the Tigervnc server. VNC
sessions would
fail quickly. I ended up force installing Tigervnc from the Heisenbug tree.
With VNC apparently settled down, I saw hard disk err
2014-07-23 22:30 GMT+03:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:11:23PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > > thank you all very much. is there a way to prevent this from
> happening?
> > > well, read my always-accurate, always-hilarious and always-informative
> > > posts on test@ and foll
I downloaded Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140723-sda.raw.xz and installed it
to a 16Gb microSD card by:
[root@lx120e ~]#
/home/rgm/fedora-arm-image-installer/fedora-arm-image-installer.sh
--image=/home/rgm/Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140723-sda.raw.xz
--target=Cubietruck --media=/dev/sdb
This also
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
271
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
83 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
63
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
2014-07-23 20:37 GMT+02:00 drago01 :
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
> >
> > On 07/23/2014 01:31 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
> >>> From: r...@htt-consult.com
> >>> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> Subject: gnome desk
On 07/23/2014 04:58 PM, John Morris wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:35 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't know if Gnome arm images are being spun up or not, but, the
issue with Gnome on ARM is with the graphics, not necessarily the
memory.
Allwinner A20 is suppose to have a fast GPU...
O
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:35 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > I don't know if Gnome arm images are being spun up or not, but, the
> > issue with Gnome on ARM is with the graphics, not necessarily the
> > memory.
>
> Allwinner A20 is suppose to have a fast GPU...
OpenGL ES or full OpenGL? Almos
Hi, folks. Just a note for those following 21 (Branched) or 22
(Rawhide): I noticed today that several of my /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo
files had .rpmnew versions, including my fedora.repo and
fedora-updates-testing.repo and fedora-rawhide.repo , even though I
didn't recall manually editing them. This
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:11:23PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > thank you all very much. is there a way to prevent this from happening?
> > well, read my always-accurate, always-hilarious and always-informative
> > posts on test@ and follow their instructions ;)
> > ok, i've just read it :) g
2014-07-23 22:09 GMT+03:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 22:08 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> > 2014-07-23 21:12 GMT+03:00 Adam Williamson :
> >
> > > On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 00:41 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 22:08 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> 2014-07-23 21:12 GMT+03:00 Adam Williamson :
>
> > On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 00:41 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > It seems that after some update, my rawh
2014-07-23 21:12 GMT+03:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 00:41 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > It seems that after some update, my rawhide system moved onto Fedora
> > > 22, leaving Fedora 21 behind. How ca
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2014 01:31 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
>>> From: r...@htt-consult.com
>>> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Subject: gnome desktop image for arm?
>>>
>>> I am looking at:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 07/23/2014 01:31 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
From: r...@htt-consult.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: gnome desktop image for arm?
I am looking at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id
And do n
On 23.07.2014 20:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 10:59 +0200, poma wrote:
And "'works' at least" still don't helps here.
After more than two months.
I already investigated the cause of the problem, talked to the developer
about it, we agreed on how to fix it, and re-opened yo
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 00:41 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that after some update, my rawhide system moved onto Fedora
> > 22, leaving Fedora 21 behind. How can i prevent this from happening on
> > my other fedora 21
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 10:59 +0200, poma wrote:
> And "'works' at least" still don't helps here.
> After more than two months.
I already investigated the cause of the problem, talked to the developer
about it, we agreed on how to fix it, and re-opened your bug with the
details: https://bugzilla.re
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
> From: r...@htt-consult.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: gnome desktop image for arm?
>
> I am looking at:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id
>
> And do not see a gnome image for f21 a
On 23.07.2014 18:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:01:29 -0500
Dan Mossor wrote:
The guys in #releng told me the slow downloads were my issue. I'm
glad it's not just me - I can't offer much beyond confirmation that
there is a problem with koji.
There really isn't a problem with k
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:01:29 -0500
Dan Mossor wrote:
> The guys in #releng told me the slow downloads were my issue. I'm
> glad it's not just me - I can't offer much beyond confirmation that
> there is a problem with koji.
There really isn't a problem with koji.
It sounds like there's a networ
On 23.07.2014 16:04, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
However what's the point now, after more than two months and how it can help us
here?
He wasn't linking for you to test it. He was pointing out GNOME's
continuous integration test system, a
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:30:08 +0200
cornel panceac wrote:
> Hello,
> It seems that after some update, my rawhide system moved onto Fedora
> 22, leaving Fedora 21 behind. How can i prevent this from happening
> on my other fedora 21system, and how can i go back now to fedora 21?
>
> Regards,
> Cor
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:30 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that after some update, my rawhide system moved onto Fedora
> 22, leaving Fedora 21 behind. How can i prevent this from happening on
> my other fedora 21system, and how can i go back now to fedora 21?
>
This should wo
I am looking at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=appliance&order=-id
And do not see a gnome image for f21 arm (let alone any hardware). So
obviously I am missing how it is encoded in the description.
How do I find the right f21 armhfp image with gnome?
xfc
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > However what's the point now, after more than two months and how it can
> > help us here?
>
> He wasn't linking for you to test it. He was pointing out GNOME's
> continuous integration test system, and noting that it covers Class
Hello,
It seems that after some update, my rawhide system moved onto Fedora 22,
leaving Fedora 21 behind. How can i prevent this from happening on my other
fedora 21system, and how can i go back now to fedora 21?
Regards,
Cornel
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
ht
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:45:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 20:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2014-07-17 20:41 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
> >
> > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918676
> >
> > > What bug is this attached to? Bugzilla does not
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
270
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
82 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
82 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6551/chicken-4.8.0.6-2.fc20
60
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6615/dru
On 23.07.2014 10:59, poma wrote:
On 23.07.2014 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 22:47 +0200, poma wrote:
OK, I tested with the "real" image
# file gnome-continuous-x86_64-runtime-20140722.30.qcow2
gnome-continuous-x86_64-runtime-20140722.30.qcow2: QEMU QCOW Image (v2),
8589
On 23/07/14 00:52, Peter Robinson wrote:
Using serial port. The Hieroglyphics regularly occur on output.
What serial rate and terminal program do you use? I see it
occasionally but find screen is usually pretty decent "screen
/dev/ttyUSB0 115200"
Program used - minicom /dev/ttyUSB0 115200 8N1.
On 23.07.2014 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 22:47 +0200, poma wrote:
OK, I tested with the "real" image
# file gnome-continuous-x86_64-runtime-20140722.30.qcow2
gnome-continuous-x86_64-runtime-20140722.30.qcow2: QEMU QCOW Image (v2),
8589934592 bytes
https://wiki.gnome.o
33 matches
Mail list logo
