Hi,
I think I jinxed my system when I said F21 was running nice and stable.
I've had a myriad of random gnome-shell crashes since then - to the
point where I'm finding it slightly difficult to use the system. I've
started filing bugs, of course. I was wondering if I can direct abrt to
send a bug
Compose started at Sun Aug 24 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
Hi,
I'm getting this error repeatedly with abrt:
--- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'stacktrace' is
invalid: List element is invalid: Element 'frames' is invalid: List element
is invalid: Element 'file_name' is missing'
On 08/24/2014 09:27 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this error repeatedly with abrt:
Hey Ankur,
It seems you just need to update abrt and few other rpms.
Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109697
HTH,
Amita
--- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 22:02 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
Hey Ankur,
Hi Amita,
It seems you just need to update abrt and few other rpms.
Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109697
Thank you for the bug link. Unfortunately, the packages I have installed
are newer than the
Hi all,
There's been some discussion on the desktop list, beginning at [1],
about Workstation's requirements for dual booting in F21. The
Workstation technical specification says the following:
One aspect of storage configuration that will be needed is support for
dual-boot setups (preserving
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:23:55 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
We currently do not have any release criterion that applies to dual
booting with other Linux systems.
Certainly one thing that could simplify this is an option to go ahead
and install the grub rpms and configure the
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
115 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7551/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc20
64
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
303
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
115 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
66
For the third or fourth time the hard disk system has crashed at omen.com
since putting various incarnations of Fedora 21 on it.
This crash seems to be triggered by heavy disk usage.
The result of the crash is that any attempted disk access returns an I/O
error.
Functions that do not require
After rebooting from the crash I ran a YUM update.
After updating a few thousand files YUM started
slowing down and eventually wedged. Apparently
some limit had been reached on the 32 GB system.
We all know not to stop YUM in the middle of an
operation, but there was no alternative.
I then did
On 08/25/14 10:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
After rebooting from the crash I ran a YUM update.
After updating a few thousand files YUM started
slowing down and eventually wedged. Apparently
some limit had been reached on the 32 GB system.
We all know not to stop YUM in the middle of an
On 08/25/14 10:11, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
For the third or fourth time the hard disk system has crashed at omen.com
since putting various incarnations of Fedora 21 on it.
This crash seems to be triggered by heavy disk usage.
The result of the crash is that any attempted disk access
On 08/24/2014 07:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/25/14 10:11, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
For the third or fourth time the hard disk system has crashed at omen.com
since putting various incarnations of Fedora 21 on it.
This crash seems to be triggered by heavy disk usage.
The result of the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:23:55 -0500,
Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
I therefore propose some new release criteria, based on the consensus
from the desktop list. It's possible that these new criteria will
directly result in further significant delays to the release of F21,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 19:42:12 -0700,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote:
I could not get httpd to run. It failed, complaining
about not being able to identify its hostname and/or
domainname. I started seeing this a few days ago
but on omen.com it is a show stopper.
I am seeing
17 matches
Mail list logo
