Re: after update, suddenly gnome-screenshot won't start

On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:04 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > Can you file this downstream in bugzilla.redhat.com too? We should be > able to propose this as an Alpha freeze exception and pull it in so > that > it gets included on the live media. Apologies Kalev, I didn't see this mail earlier. Thanks

Re: Is there a reason gnome documents wasn't part of the test day?

On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:35 -0400, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't think there was a specific reason. The test day page basically > gets copy/pasted from release to release, and it may just be that > no-one > thought to add notes/test cases for Documents. It's absolutely worth > testing it and fil

EE Xorg.bin xf86PlatformMatchDriver - Segmentation fault - Server aborting

First of all, I welcome the revered readership. Graciously invite you to help me figure out what's going on here. With: - xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.16.0-5.fc22.x86_64 - xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.16.0-6.fc22.x86_64 including: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-server.git/commit/?id=5556cee ..

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha to slip by one week

Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Alpha release by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs [1] and no release candidate available. More details in meeting minutes [2]. As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be pushed out by one week [3]. The n

Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria

On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > I think the language you have is functional, it just needs a delimiter > establishing our purview. Although, I'd suggest the size of the > distribution doesn't matter, if we nerf someone's system because of > something we're not doing correct

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting :: Thursday, Sep. 04, 19:00 UTC

== #fedora-meeting-2: F21 Alpha Readiness Meeting == Meeting started by jreznik at 19:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-09-04/f21-alpha-readiness-

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:29 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Does apper work for package installation/removal > > without PackageKit installed? And can you remove apper without KDE > going > > away? > > Pretty sure the answer to those are (should be!): no, yes, respectivel

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

Adam Williamson wrote: > Does apper work for package installation/removal > without PackageKit installed? And can you remove apper without KDE going > away? Pretty sure the answer to those are (should be!): no, yes, respectively. -- rex -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Fedora 21 at omen.com

Yesterday I installed Fedora 21 net install using the boot.iso. Installation of the Xfce desktop proceeded smoothly. Two problems, previously reported, persist. After installing and running system-config-printer lp and lpr produce blank pages as previously reported. Workaround: enscript Tigerv

Re: Introduction: Naresh

On 09/04/2014 09:52 PM, Naresh Vijayakumar wrote: Thanks for the links Amita. I'll start once the ISO download completes. :) your welcome Naresh, good luck! On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Amita Sharma > wrote: On 09/03/2014 11:59 AM, Naresh Vijayakumar wr

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:28 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but > > 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already > > filed: > > Either that, or apper should require

Re: Introduction: Naresh

Thanks for the links Amita. I'll start once the ISO download completes. :) On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Amita Sharma wrote: > > On 09/03/2014 11:59 AM, Naresh Vijayakumar wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > Hello Naresh, > > Welcome to community :) > > I just finished with creating all the accoun

Really eth0 problem - Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On a Cubietruck - # yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora

Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On a Cubietruck - # yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck good. One of the configured repositories faile

Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On a Cubietruck - > > # yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck > One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp), > and yum doesn't have enough

yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

On a Cubietruck - # yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work "fix" this: I will

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but > 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already > filed: Either that, or apper should require PackageKit directly -- IIRC there was some push a few releases ago t

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On 09/04/14 21:22, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD. >> >> Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of >> >> "A problem that we were not expecting has occurred." >> "The name org.freedesktop.P

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On Thursday 04 September 2014 17:43:16 Ed Greshko wrote: > Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD. > > Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of > > "A problem that we were not expecting has occurred." > "The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service f

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD. > > Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of > > "A problem that we were not expecting has occurred." > "The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file"

F-21 Branched report: 20140904 changes

Compose started at Thu Sep 4 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-

rawhide report: 20140904 changes

Broken deps for i386 -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.

apper in Alpha TC5 F21

Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD. Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of "A problem that we were not expecting has occurred." "The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file" Installing "PackageKit" fixes the problem. Don't see a bugzil