Sometimes, if rebooting my box by the upper right gnome3 menu, there is
some additional toggle button in the appearing popup (besides the OK,
Cancel, ... buttons) : Install pending software updates?. If I
activate this toggle button, then during the boot process a message
shortly appears saying
On 10/03/2014 10:51 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Sometimes, if rebooting my box by the upper right gnome3 menu, there is
some additional toggle button in the appearing popup (besides the OK,
Cancel, ... buttons) : Install pending software updates?. If I
activate this toggle button, then during
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 10/03/2014 10:51 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Sometimes, if rebooting my box by the upper right gnome3 menu, there is
some additional toggle button in the appearing popup (besides the OK,
Cancel, ... buttons)
Compose started at Fri Oct 3 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires
With GT8600 (rv84), both F20 F21, kernel 3.16.3, nouveau, 1600x1200
on
DVI-I-1, 1920x1080 on DVI-I-2, and no manual configuration of X, I get
1600x1200 leftof and 1920x1080 rightof, 3520x1200 according to
xdpyinfo,
though mouse won't reach 1080-1199 in the 1600x3519 range (which I
suppose
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:57:43PM +0200, milanisko k wrote:
are the Cloud Image news being published on the Fedmsg channels?
I'd like to investigate integration of RedHatQE's test runner and suite
https://github.com/RedHatQE/dva.
Amazingly, yes -- that plan is slowly, slowly coming to
Compose started at Fri Oct 3 05:15:04 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so
Hey, folks!
I spent some time today fiddling around with the installation validation
matrix. I haven't applied the changes to Beta TC1 to give us some time
to review/tweak them, but they're in the template:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_matrix
I like the new
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 10:51 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
So, how to get more info about this updates?
pkcon get-transactions
(Look at the very bottom of the output.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 10/03/2014 04:06 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 10:51 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
So, how to get more info about this updates?
pkcon get-transactions
(Look at the very bottom of the output.)
Thank you, Michael, for this useful information.
Kind regards
Joachim
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:56:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks!
I spent some time today fiddling around with the installation validation
matrix. I haven't applied the changes to Beta TC1 to give us some time
to review/tweak them, but they're in the template:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:07 -0300, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I have just faced this problem, on a Fedora 20 fresh install. All Fedora 19
works out of the box with the same setup. It seems a regression to me.
Raised https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022977.
Do Fedora maintainers raise
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:58:48 UTC. The full logs are available at
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:49:33PM +0800, Marle Cua-chin wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm very excited to join the Fedora QA team, I would like to share
whatever knowledge I have with regards to Fedora/Linux to the community and
also to rest of the planet.
I love using fedora as my personal
On 10/03/2014 03:35 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Glad to have you on board! You've joined at the right time, since we have
plenty of testing to do for the Beta release :) Ping us on freenode if you
have any questions or just want to chat!
--
I run fedora 20, and I had a spare partition, so I
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
I don't know why you see it as an F19 to F20 regression, because I'm
fairly sure it's been broken the whole time.
I have two servers now running libvirtd + firewalld + NM, one is F19 and
the other (the newest)
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
343
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
155 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
106
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
155 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
49
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
24
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
21
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10767/squid-3.4.7-2.fc21
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11677/rubygem-bundler-1.7.3-1.fc21
2
19 matches
Mail list logo