The usual suspects for leading the QA meeting are going to be out at
meeting time tomorrow and I'm not up to date enough with the possible
topics to put together a good agenda, so I propose that we cancel the
QA meeting tomorrow.
Of course, if there are topics that need discussion, I'm happy to
fa
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
387
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
199 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
150
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
199 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/geary-0.6.3-1.fc20
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10468/icecr
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15142/mantis-1.2.17-4.fc21
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14888/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs-2014.05.28-3.fc21
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 11/16/2014 09:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I seem to recall that there was a netinst iso, at least at some
point? I only now have the time for testing, and I don't see it on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Final_TC2_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/16/2014 09:24 PM, poma wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The Xfce is another word for stability, developed or released.
>>
>> I'm glad it's stable for you.
>
> And you as a packager can be more proactive about it all, without
> waiting to be served. And no
On 17.11.2014 04:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:26:26 +0100
> poma wrote:
>
>> It seems, some terms confuse you, so let me clarify for you,
>> development != unstable
>
> development versions can be unstable or stable or stable for some
> people and unstable for others.
>
> Ty
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:26:26 +0100
poma wrote:
> It seems, some terms confuse you, so let me clarify for you,
> development != unstable
development versions can be unstable or stable or stable for some
people and unstable for others.
Typically, Development versions are where upstream is changi
I seem to recall that there was a netinst iso, at least at some point?
I only now have the time for testing, and I don't see it on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Final_TC2_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
I have downloaded the live iso and will sta
Thank you Kevin , I can test it once it is available
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Fenzi"
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 7:13:48 PM
Subject: Re: karma wanted:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfdesktop-4.10.3-1.fc21
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 1
On 17.11.2014 03:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 02:36:11 +0100
> poma wrote:
>
>> On 17.11.2014 02:15, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please test this update (Kevin's email below) if possible. Thanks!
>>> Mukundan.
>>>
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:59:37 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Currently mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os
> has 4.10.1 and no xfprint
I just submitted it for updates-testing... so it should appear there
after the next updates push.
xfprint is dead. We retired it a while b
On 17.11.2014 02:59, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Currently mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os
> has 4.10.1 and no xfprint
>
xfprint is more than two years out of service, why mention it now?
Information for package xfprint
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packag
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 02:36:11 +0100
poma wrote:
> On 17.11.2014 02:15, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > Please test this update (Kevin's email below) if possible. Thanks!
> > Mukundan.
> >
>
> You don't need approval since Xfce is
Currently mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os
has 4.10.1 and no xfprint
On 11/16/2014 05:15 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please test this update (Kevin's email below) if possible. Thanks!
Mukundan.
- Forwarded Message -
On 17.11.2014 02:15, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> Please test this update (Kevin's email below) if possible. Thanks!
> Mukundan.
>
You don't need approval since Xfce is approval per se.
I drive xfdesktop-4.11.8-1.fc21.x86_64 since it is mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please test this update (Kevin's email below) if possible. Thanks!
Mukundan.
- Forwarded Message
Subject: karma wanted:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfdesktop-4.10.3-1.fc21
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:22:42 -0700
From:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in
>> LXDE environment, but after that again everytime it failed.
>>
>> Then I tried using "debugging
After suspend/resume worked in LXDE I tried logging out of LXDE and
logging into GNOME 3, now suspend/resume also worked in GNOME 3 also!
But after reboot suspend/resume wouldn't work in any combination... I
tried again logging into XFCE then into LXCE -> fail, straight to XFCE
-> fail, straing in
On 17.11.2014 00:23, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> After seeing Peter's message [1] I tried suspend/resume on XFCE but I
> still got same result. I could hear hdd spinning up and cpu fan
> working, but power led would still be in suspend mode - just blinking,
> with screen off.
> But with LXDE
Well I found some iso instructions and are downloading it and will see
what happens when I go and install from it.
On 11/16/2014 08:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I maintain local mirrors for the actgive versions I use here via
rsync. But now it is past time for me to test F21 x86 on a noteboo
After seeing Peter's message [1] I tried suspend/resume on XFCE but I
still got same result. I could hear hdd spinning up and cpu fan
working, but power led would still be in suspend mode - just blinking,
with screen off.
But with LXDE suspend/resume works flawlessly! In LXDE suspend works
as expec
On 16.11.2014 23:09, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I would definitely do this if I was payed to do so, but not just to
> satisfy my curiosity how each part of linux kernel works.
> I'm sure this is now how bug reporting was intended to work. RTFM is
> not always the correct answer. A good defa
I would definitely do this if I was payed to do so, but not just to
satisfy my curiosity how each part of linux kernel works.
I'm sure this is now how bug reporting was intended to work. RTFM is
not always the correct answer. A good default one, but not correct one
I'm sure.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 a
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 15:34 -0600, Dan Mossor wrote:
> Also, firewalld for F21 includes new zones - FedoraWorkstation (for the
> workstation product) and FedoraServer (for the server product). These
> zones become the default for NetworkManager, and start off with only a
> few services enabled
On 11/16/2014 12:06 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/17/2014 06:19 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Have a few issues that are now having, but think they are all related..
Had a desktop (using as mini server) that was running Fedora 20. I used
yum to upgrade to latest on F21, both main and testing repo
On 11/17/2014 06:19 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Have a few issues that are now having, but think they are all related..
Had a desktop (using as mini server) that was running Fedora 20. I used
yum to upgrade to latest on F21, both main and testing repos, and
upgraded without a hitch (no errors that
Have a few issues that are now having, but think they are all related..
Had a desktop (using as mini server) that was running Fedora 20. I used
yum to upgrade to latest on F21, both main and testing repos, and
upgraded without a hitch (no errors that I saw).
Now, I can't mount my nfs partitions,
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
386
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
198 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
149
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
198 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/geary-0.6.3-1.fc20
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10468/icecr
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14892/libdigidoc-3.9.1.1191-1.fc21
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15142/mantis-1.2.17-4.fc21
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-
I maintain local mirrors for the actgive versions I use here via rsync.
But now it is past time for me to test F21 x86 on a notebook I have
assigned to this task (a Lenovo x120e with a clean SSD). Where do I get
the OS and updates? If I pull them down, and build an dvd of the iso
netinstall,
Compose started at Sun Nov 16 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtt
Compose started at Sun Nov 16 07:15:07 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0
[avro]
avro-mapred-
34 matches
Mail list logo
